Talk:California State Route 1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Rschen7754 (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
Charlesreid1 (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
-- [[User:Charlesreid1|Charlesreid1]] ([[User talk:Charlesreid1|talk]]) 00:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
-- [[User:Charlesreid1|Charlesreid1]] ([[User talk:Charlesreid1|talk]]) 00:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
:No, I don't think so - too much uncited material, too many details missing from the history. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 00:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
:No, I don't think so - too much uncited material, too many details missing from the history. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 00:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
::Any opinion on which sections are most in need of improvement? What kind of details are you looking for in the history that are missing? -- [[User:Charlesreid1|Charlesreid1]] ([[User talk:Charlesreid1|talk]]) 04:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:14, 10 July 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unprotected
Any problems, please sort on talk page. Rich Farmbrough 11:36 8 March 2006 (UTC).
Increasing Article Class
Comparing this article, which is rated C class, to several other Featured Article class articles about other California State Routes (California State Route 52 – California State Route 56 – California State Route 57 – California State Route 67 – California State Route 75 – California State Route 76 – California State Route 78 – California State Route 94), this article does not have any major gaps in quality (that I can find) when compared to the other featured articles. I think it's ready to be considered for Good Article status (and someday soon, maybe even a Featured Article).
-- Charlesreid1 (talk) 00:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so - too much uncited material, too many details missing from the history. --Rschen7754 00:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Any opinion on which sections are most in need of improvement? What kind of details are you looking for in the history that are missing? -- Charlesreid1 (talk) 04:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class California road transport articles
- Mid-importance California road transport articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- California road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles
- C-Class California articles
- Mid-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles