Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requesting protection for Kirby Dach
Line 59: Line 59:


'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – Multiple unreferenced OR and irrelevant edits by a succession of anon IPs, presumably the same person. Impossible to engage with them because the address keeps changing. [[User:Andyjsmith|Andyjsmith]] ([[User talk:Andyjsmith|talk]]) 14:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – Multiple unreferenced OR and irrelevant edits by a succession of anon IPs, presumably the same person. Impossible to engage with them because the address keeps changing. [[User:Andyjsmith|Andyjsmith]] ([[User talk:Andyjsmith|talk]]) 14:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

=== [[Kirby Dach]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Kirby Dach}}
'''Reason:''' High level of vandalism [[User:FlyingOtter|FlyingOtter]] ([[User talk:FlyingOtter|talk]]) 15:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:11, 6 January 2022

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Reason: Article is subject of an ongoing RM discussion, Has already been moved 4 times in 36 hours. Request article be movedc back to Locomotive Services Limited as it was before all the tooing and frowing started in and a move block be placed to halt until RM process has been concluded. Prepopots (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done since the other target is already move protected at sysop level. El_C 11:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To keep this page about a super important Australian institute during this pandemic safe from new and unregistered users ruining the article. I need to have it at the semi-protected level. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All bar one of the edits to this article since mid-December have been by sock accounts of prolific sockpuppet User:Politialguru. This seems to be one the favourite articles for his/her trademark wikifiddling. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: 10mmsocket, can you point to a recent disruptive edit by a confirmed user that would justify going straight to WP:ECP from none without trying WP:SEMI first? And can explain the connection of that blocked user to any one account in that page? That is not immediately evident, either. El_C 11:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. user DFXYME is vanadalizing Arunudoy (talk) 10:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Nominating an article for deletion is not vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced addition to Members section. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs persistently introducing factual errors to the Infobox. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0A:19AF:A14A:29FE:9F33:1BAE (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from the last few days from IP Addresses. Swagging (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD0A:19AF:951C:BC3C:C864:D2E8 (talk) 14:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war on how the article should be formatted. – DarkGlow14:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple unreferenced OR and irrelevant edits by a succession of anon IPs, presumably the same person. Impossible to engage with them because the address keeps changing. Andyjsmith (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism FlyingOtter (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]