User talk:HighKing: Difference between revisions
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== BFL Draft Question == |
== BFL Draft Question == |
||
Hi HighKing. Could you please help me by reviewing the below links and explaining to me so that I understand why they do not qualify based on the descriptions that you mentioned? I believe that this is independent coverage not introduced by the company and these are not passing references. If you believe that the coverage is not independent, I would like to understand the criteria for which this assessment is made on Wikipedia so that I can find the right links. I am a bit confused generally, because the previous editor made the comment that the topic does not have significant coverage, but the editor before said that stated that it does and the page was ready for publication. The comment regarding the "organization" versus the "founder and management" -- it seems that the majority of the reporting journalists always write about the founder extensively as part of their coverage of the company and its products, because they believe that she has an intriguing background. But I don't believe that this negates the coverage itself. And this seems to be an issue of debate between the editors. I introduced some of the additional links to give the editors an understanding of the company's scale. The Government of Moscow is stating on its own website that this is the largest company in Russia in the sector, while the Russian Government's official export center is stating that it is one of Russia's flagship exporters. I just thought this was important for the reviewing editors to see, so that they understand that this is a very significant and not a fly-by-night company. |
Hi HighKing. Could you please help me by reviewing the below links and explaining to me so that I understand why they do not qualify based on the descriptions that you mentioned? I believe that this is independent coverage not introduced by the company and these are not passing references. If you believe that the coverage is not independent, I would like to understand the criteria for which this assessment is made on Wikipedia so that I can find the right links. I am a bit confused generally, because the previous editor made the comment that the topic does not have significant coverage, but the editor before said that stated that it does and the page was ready for publication. The comment regarding the "organization" versus the "founder and management" -- it seems that the majority of the reporting journalists always write about the founder extensively as part of their coverage of the company and its products, because they believe that she has an intriguing background. But I don't believe that this negates the coverage itself. And this seems to be an issue of debate between the editors. I introduced some of the additional links to give the editors an understanding of the company's scale. The Government of Moscow is stating on its own website that this is the largest company in Russia in the sector, while the Russian Government's official export center is stating that it is one of Russia's flagship exporters. I just thought this was important for the reviewing editors to see, so that they understand that this is a very significant and not a fly-by-night company. I really do not agree that all the references "rely on announcements or interviews or information provided by the company." Before The Moscow Times or CNN or Intellinews covers a story, they seriously vet it. Any legitimate source does. For instance, CNN maybe covered, this is a guess, 25 or 30 companies per year maximum for the program linked below. So the fact that a story includes quotes from a subject means nothing. I say this as someone who has worked and continues to work as a business/finance editor for news publications for the past 20 years. |
||
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/11/12/russian-health-food-startup-soars-during-pandemic-a72008 |
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/11/12/russian-health-food-startup-soars-during-pandemic-a72008 |
||
Revision as of 04:29, 31 July 2021
| This is HighKing's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
You are welcome to leave messages here. If you place a message here, then I will reply here (rather than on, say, your user page). Conversely, if I've left a message on your talk page, please tag me by using something like {{u|HighKing}} so I'll be notified and will reply on your Talk page.
Why my article is rejected?
Hi, my article for Guilherme Hirose was rejected by you. But it MEETS the criteria for that kind of musician, since the artist is the ALL responsible for entering the JAPANESE CHARTS FOUR TIMES, and it is also member of a INTERNATIONAL SUPERGROUP with a WORLD TOUR scheduled.
Request on 01:25:10, 31 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by YCC Lisa
What if I couldn't find any other resources that talk about the organization, since it is a organization in Vietnam.
YCC Lisa (talk) 01:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
BFL Draft Question
Hi HighKing. Could you please help me by reviewing the below links and explaining to me so that I understand why they do not qualify based on the descriptions that you mentioned? I believe that this is independent coverage not introduced by the company and these are not passing references. If you believe that the coverage is not independent, I would like to understand the criteria for which this assessment is made on Wikipedia so that I can find the right links. I am a bit confused generally, because the previous editor made the comment that the topic does not have significant coverage, but the editor before said that stated that it does and the page was ready for publication. The comment regarding the "organization" versus the "founder and management" -- it seems that the majority of the reporting journalists always write about the founder extensively as part of their coverage of the company and its products, because they believe that she has an intriguing background. But I don't believe that this negates the coverage itself. And this seems to be an issue of debate between the editors. I introduced some of the additional links to give the editors an understanding of the company's scale. The Government of Moscow is stating on its own website that this is the largest company in Russia in the sector, while the Russian Government's official export center is stating that it is one of Russia's flagship exporters. I just thought this was important for the reviewing editors to see, so that they understand that this is a very significant and not a fly-by-night company. I really do not agree that all the references "rely on announcements or interviews or information provided by the company." Before The Moscow Times or CNN or Intellinews covers a story, they seriously vet it. Any legitimate source does. For instance, CNN maybe covered, this is a guess, 25 or 30 companies per year maximum for the program linked below. So the fact that a story includes quotes from a subject means nothing. I say this as someone who has worked and continues to work as a business/finance editor for news publications for the past 20 years.
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2491212
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10155128115313067 (CNN)
JohannesburgBlues (talk) 04:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)JohannesburgBlues