Talk:Caroline of Brunswick: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:44, 24 February 2021

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

British Royalty B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

London B‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Germany B‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's History B‑class Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England B‑class Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom B‑class Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lower Saxony (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lower Saxony, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Lower SaxonyWikipedia:WikiProject Lower SaxonyTemplate:WikiProject Lower SaxonyLower Saxony articles

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 17, 2020.

Pains and Penalties Bill 1820

ODNB says ". . . convince many peers of her guilt, many also feared that her condemnation would spark off popular rioting or even revolution. Ministers realized that even if the Lords passed the bill the House of Commons would almost certainly reject it under intense pressure from their constituents. The bill passed its third reading in the Lords by only nine votes and Liverpool, the prime minister, announced on 10 November that it would proceed no further. SOURCE: E. A. Smith, ‘Caroline (1768–1821)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford Universityy Press, 2004 accessed 30 Sept 2006.

Why does WP think the Bill was defeated?

Did she play cricket for England?88.211.22.56 (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---Vernon White

text corrected.Ekem 14:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Lushington

There seems to be a conflict between the narrative on this page and of that on the page of Stephen Lushington johnnybriggs (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Brougham

... Henry Brougham (pronounced "broom", "brew-am", or "bro'am")....

Do we mean it was pronounced three ways, or that we're not sure how it was pronounced? Sca (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I boldly removed it, it's not even listed three ways on Brougham's own wikipedia article. Tkech (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New file File:Caroline Amelia Elizabeth of Brunswick by Sir George Hayter.jpg

Recently the file File:Caroline Amelia Elizabeth of Brunswick by Sir George Hayter.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 02:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Complaints to the BBC.

Given the vandalism was encouraged by the BBC Cricket coverage, I think it is fair to point to the BBC Complaints homepage. I know I will be submitting a complaint about this matter. Catwhoorg (talk) 13:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've read through the BBC Cricket coverage and, although they show an image of the vandalism, I don't really think the BBC encouraged people to vandalise this entry Si1965 (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If people are going to be taken in by such irreverence, and indeed if "Catwhoorg" is going to persist in believing that people are going to taken in by the possibility that Caroline of Brunswick was the lover of Shane Warne, I should let them. It says more about those being taken in, than those people who are just having a laugh. Do you really think anyone, regardless of whether or not they have heard of C of B, would use wikipedia to discover if she had any connection to (as the same BBC Cricket forum put it) the "Varnished Weeble"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7thTricky (talk • contribs) 09:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bartolomeo Bergami

http://web.archive.org/web/20080706170406/http://www.old-church-galleries.com/stock_7336.asp details "A fine and rare proof engraving of the House of Lords interior. The scene relates to the time when Caroline Brunswick, estranged wife of King George IV was brought before the House of Lords following her husband’s accession to the Throne. The Pains and Penalties Bill 1820 was introduced in Parliament in order to strip Caroline of the title of Queen and dissolve her marriage to the King on the grounds that Caroline had been involved with a man called Bartolomeo Bergami, ("a foreigner of low station") in a most degrading intimacy." Why is there no mention of this episode in the article? 2.31.162.47 (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is. In fact, it's the bulk of the article and there are four pictures of it. DrKay (talk) 08:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

in the Jupiter or on the Jupiter

In the Engagement section, it stated 'Caroline and Malmesbury left Cuxhaven in the Jupiter.' I Googled 'in a ship or on a ship' and the general consensus appears to be that passengers are on a ship whilst cargo is in a ship (and even then not always). I have therefor made what I've marked as a minor edit. As this is a page of an important historic figure, which has been the subject of some shenanigans in the past, I thought it important to document. Adagio67 (talk) 09:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 http://web.archive.org/web/20080706170406/http://www.old-church-galleries.com/stock_7336.asp details "A fine and rare proof engraving of the House of Lords interior. The scene relates to the time when Caroline Brunswick, estranged wife of King George IV was brought before the House of Lords following her husband’s accession to the Throne. The Pains and Penalties Bill 1820 was introduced in Parliament in order to strip Caroline of the title of Queen and dissolve her marriage to the King on the grounds that Caroline had been involved with a man called Bartolomeo Bergami, ("a foreigner of low station") in a most degrading intimacy."  Why is there no mention of this episode in the article? [[Special:Contributions/2.31.162.47|2.31.162.47]] ([[User talk:2.31.162.47|talk]]) 00:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 :There is. In fact, it's the bulk of the article and there are four pictures of it. [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 08:23, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
+== in the Jupiter or on the Jupiter ==
+In the Engagement section, it stated 'Caroline and Malmesbury left Cuxhaven in the Jupiter.' I Googled 'in a ship or on a ship' and the general consensus appears to be that passengers are on a ship whilst cargo is in a ship (and even then not always). I have therefor made what I've marked as a minor edit. As this is a page of an important historic figure, which has been the subject of some shenanigans in the past, I thought it important to document. [[User:Adagio67|Adagio67]] ([[User talk:Adagio67|talk]]) 09:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)