User talk:Icewhiz: Difference between revisions
→March Madness 2020: new section Tag: |
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) m Protected "User talk:Icewhiz": no obvious reason for this to be edited but if there is a need, let me know on my talk page ([Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite)) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
''For Icewhiz's talk page at commons.wikimedia, click [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Icewhiz here].'' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has determined through private evidence, including evidence from the [[WP:Checkuser|checkuser]] tool, that {{user|Eostrix}} (a current RfA candidate) is a sockpuppet of {{user|Icewhiz}}. Accordingly, the Committee has resolved that Eostrix be indefinitely blocked. |
|||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 01:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
==Sockpuppet investigation== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{bots|deny=HostBot}} |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
{{ArbCom block}} |
|||
|An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| [[User:Eggishorn|<span style="background-color:#FF7400; color:#FFFFFF;">Eggishorn</span>]] [[User talk:Eggishorn|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Eggishorn|(contrib)]] 17:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)}} |
|||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee [[User:Worm That Turned|<b style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;">''Worm''</b>]]<sup>TT</sup>([[User talk:Worm That Turned|<b style="color:#060;">talk</b>]]) 13:11, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
}} [[User:Eggishorn|<span style="background-color:#FF7400; color:#FFFFFF;">Eggishorn</span>]] [[User talk:Eggishorn|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Eggishorn|(contrib)]] 17:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Icewhiz banned== |
|||
The committee has resolved by motion that: |
|||
{{Ivmbox|1= The Arbitration Committee has received convincing evidence that [[USer:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] has engaged in [[WP:OWH|off-wiki harassment]] of multiple editors. Consequently, he is indefinitely site banned from the English Wikipedia.}} |
|||
Supporting: GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, KrakatoaKatie, Premeditated Chaos, Worm That Turned |
|||
Opposing: |
|||
Did not vote: AGK, Mkdw, Opabinia regalis |
|||
: For the Arbitration Committee |
|||
[[User:Worm That Turned|<b style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;">''Worm''</b>]]<sup>TT</sup>([[User talk:Worm That Turned|<b style="color:#060;">talk</b>]]) 13:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Good god, I had no idea. Not sure if I am surprised or disappointed he was dumb enough to get this kind of ban (but I am shocked). I did not think that highly of Icewhiz, but did not think this lowly of him either.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== March Madness 2020 == |
|||
G'day all, '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/March Madness 2020|March Madness 2020]]''' is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Peacemaker67@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=942358914 --> |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:29, 8 March 2023
Eostrix Blocked
The Arbitration Committee has determined through private evidence, including evidence from the checkuser tool, that Eostrix (talk · contribs) (a current RfA candidate) is a sockpuppet of Icewhiz (talk · contribs). Accordingly, the Committee has resolved that Eostrix be indefinitely blocked. For the Arbitration Committee, Beeblebrox (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Eostrix Blocked
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.