Talk:Tītokowaru's War: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 08:00, 10 February 2024

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 24, 2011, March 24, 2013, March 24, 2014, March 24, 2016, March 24, 2020, and March 24, 2022.

Military history: South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

New Zealand: Māori Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Im not sure if the last line is quite phrased in encylopaedia like language, but since it amused me greatly i have left it in (nowhere does it say wikipedia has to be boring).-Isthatyou

I've changed "of Te Manu" to "o Te Manu" which is the correct spelling of the place. 87.74.29.231 22:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect to first poster (Isthatyou) but I know the main writer of this article personally - they wrote that in conjuction with 3 other people over a period of 4 years starting back in 2001 (if memory serves me right.). The core elements of the reference have not been altered to any major degree and the second writer has not updated it as they could not remember login details -(as with the first contributor). I'm currently using the second contributors new login. I know this to be true as they were students of Te Wananga O Raukawa (TWOR) and also members of the Ngati Ruanui tribe. The article came about as a study requirement however the details were excess to their respective papers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blingblingjaxx (talk • contribs)

Bollocks. I wrote the article myself in 2003. Since then many other people have contributed and added to the article, most notably Grimhim in 2008. Also I have never been a student at Te Wananga o Raukawa. ping (talk) 07:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tītokowaru's War/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This material is heavily plagiarised from NJ Taniwha's dissertation and summary notes - why hasnt her work been acknowledged? I am disgusted to think that others would allow her to remain obscure considering how much of her effort has been "plagiarised". The whole composition is filled with direct quotes from her. Very very dissapointed in acknowledgement annotation.

Last edited at 03:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{On this day|date1=2011-03-24|oldid1=420576919|date2=2013-03-24|oldid2=546478013|date3=2014-03-24|oldid3=601033025|date4=2016-03-24|oldid4=711647199|date5=2020-03-24|oldid5=946819797|date6=2022-03-24|oldid6=1078929561}}
-{{WPMILHIST|class = B
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
-|B1=yes
+{{WikiProject Military history
-|B2=yes
+|class = B
-|B3=yes
+|<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
-|B4=yes
-|B5=yes
+|B-Class-1=yes
+<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
-|New-Zealand=yes
+|B-Class-2=yes
+<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
+|B-Class-3=yes
+<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
+|B-Class-4=yes
+<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
+|B-Class-5=yes
+|ANZSP-task-force=yes
 }}
-{{WPNZ|class=B|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject New Zealand|importance=low|maori=yes|maori-importance=high}}
+}}
+==Untitled==
 Im not sure if the last line is quite phrased in encylopaedia like language, but since it amused me greatly i have left it in (nowhere does it say wikipedia has to be boring).-Isthatyou
@@ Line 15: / Line 26: @@
 No disrespect to first poster (Isthatyou) but I know the main writer of this article personally - they wrote that in conjuction with 3 other people over a period of 4 years starting back in 2001 (if memory serves me right.). The core elements of the reference have not been altered to any major degree and the second writer has not updated it as they could not remember login details -(as with the first contributor). I'm currently using the second contributors new login.
-I know this to be true as they were students of Te Wananga O Raukawa (TWOR) and also members of the Ngati Ruanui tribe. The article came about as a study requirement however the details were excess to their respective papers {{unsigned|Blingblingjaxx}}
+I know this to be true as they were students of Te Wananga O Raukawa (TWOR) and also members of the Ngati Ruanui tribe. The article came about as a study requirement however the details were excess to their respective papers <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Blingblingjaxx|Blingblingjaxx]] ([[User talk:Blingblingjaxx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Blingblingjaxx|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 Bollocks.  I wrote the article myself in 2003.  Since then many other people have contributed and added to the article, most notably Grimhim in 2008.   Also I have never been a student at Te Wananga o Raukawa.
 [[User:Ping|ping]] ([[User talk:Ping|talk]]) 07:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
+==Assessment comment==
+{{Substituted comment|length=370|lastedit=20081101030713|comment=This material is heavily plagiarised from NJ Taniwha's dissertation and summary notes - why hasnt her work been acknowledged? I am disgusted to think that others would allow her  to remain obscure considering how much of her effort has been "plagiarised". The whole composition is filled with direct quotes from her. Very very dissapointed in acknowledgement annotation.}}
+Substituted at 08:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)