Jump to content

User talk:Sjö: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Mudvayne: new section
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
[[/Archive 8]]
[[/Archive 8]]
[[/Archive 9]]
[[/Archive 9]]
[[/Archive 10]]}}
[[/Archive 10]]
[[/Archive 10]]
[[/Archive 11]]}}
I prefer to keep conversations together and usually respond here, so please watch this page for my reply. I move old conversations to the archive, usually once a year. <br /><br /> '''To leave a message on this page, please [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjö&action=edit&section=new click here.]'''
I prefer to keep conversations together and usually respond here, so please watch this page for my reply. I move old conversations to the archive, usually once a year. <br /><br /> '''To leave a message on this page, please [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjö&action=edit&section=new click here.]'''




== Why did you revert my edits? Give reasons. ==
== Pakistani rape gangs in UK ==


On what basis did you claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives? And explain why my edits were not suitable for lede, when it is just introducing the concept of ownership as the article should in its opening.
In these little british towns, almost all people are white british. The white british girls are the easy target for the foreign sex rings. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2800:484:7E80:1F00:F158:FA18:2C98:EE11|2800:484:7E80:1F00:F158:FA18:2C98:EE11]] ([[User talk:2800:484:7E80:1F00:F158:FA18:2C98:EE11#top|talk]]) 06:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Please only add what you can support with reliable sources, not what you ''think'' is true. See [[WP:V]] and [[WP:OR]] for the relevant guidelines. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
[[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 06:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


:The victims were vulnerable children, in care. They were victimised because they were vulnerable, not because of the colour of their skin. Making it about 'race' provides an easy excuse to avoid giving such vulnerable people the care they deserve. The majority of child abuse in Britain is, unsurprisingly, carried out by people from the majority (i.e. 'White') population. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 06:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
:The lede should be an overview of the article and reflect what is in the body of the article. It should not introduce new information, and what information is there should be presented in an accessible way. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::You missed a point. On what basis did you make the claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives and therefore biased? Just because the name of the book is Socialism, on that basis?
::Second Point
::What part of it is "new information"? My edits were just expounding on the topic of ownership in such a way that was very accessible and introductory. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::That ownership is only related to economic goods is a questionable view and I believe not the general opinion. The differentation between legal, sociological and economic ownership is less problematic, but the reasoning about "having" seems to be specific to this particular philosopher. And it is absolutely not accessible. However, if you think the text should be included I think that you should start a discussion about the addition at [[Talk:Ownership]]. My talk page is not the place to discuss article content. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Are you even thinking before replying?
::::What is written at the very initial of the article?
::::"possession of property that may be any asset tangible or intangible".
::::What property do you know that does not have an economic value? Property is an asset be it in control of an individual or the government or state, and therefore an economic good. Most, if not all property is an economic good.
::::And you said "reasoning of having seems unique to that particular philosopher"?
::::My edit just talked about ''possession'', and that possession of something does not mean that the possessor has the ownership of it. Example - A thief stealing something does not make the thing its, and that the law recognises this. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 07:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Please discuss article content on the article talk page. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::I am not here to discuss article content, I am here to ask on what basis you removed mine? And that's your reply? You just dodged everything. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 07:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::You are discussing article content. This is the wrong place. Take it to the article talk page. Please stop posting here. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::You removed my edits and now you are telling me to go to talk page and yalk there? Yes thats the best dodge i have ever seen. I dont think you will address any points I made. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 08:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


== [[Split rock of Horeb]] ==
== Hi! Regarding the edit to Black Culture page ==


Thanks for catching that. Glad to see you've seen the article, which doesn't show any signs of notability as the sources only have one line mentions. What do you think? I've warned the editor about falsely labelling edits as fixing typos. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 13:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I saw the message and alteration on why the change, but there was a reason for the alteration I made as a historian, specifically African and African American historian.
:I made a quick Google search to see if there was any reliable source about the scholars and archaeologists claim, and I got lots of hits to religious sites. Going back, I can see that there seems to be no reliable sources at all in that search. I think that the article at least qualifies for a PROD. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 17:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
::It now has only one source as Newsweek is not longer considered reliable so I removed it.[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Newsweek (2013-present)]]. See [[Rephidim]], a pretty bad article. One source there is bad but interesting as it says it might not be able to identify it. Then there is [[Mount Horeb]]. Again not an RS, [https://doubtingthomasresearch.com/split-rock-battlefield-rephidim/], I tried this search of Google books [https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=286f218df0db1919&sxsrf=ACQVn09sR0zYP3gm3orpvf3vnQcnpT2BIg:1711035167987&q=%22Split+Rock%22+Moses&tbm=bks&source=lnms&prmd=ivmnbtz&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0_Irb1oWFAxURSkEAHV1HCvMQ0pQJegQIVhAB&biw=1046&bih=466&dpr=1.84] but to my horror I found I've messed up my display and I can't read previews. Everything has a blue background and I only see partial bits. Anyway, stopping now for my treadmill work. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 15:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


== My edits on Sweden Democrats ==
If I may… Black Culture is not the same as African Culture, and this is confusing to many people. It’s not taking about black people as much as it is talking about specific “culture”. It is looked at as a full term, not separating words, similar to tennis shoe or basketball. Taking the words apart give different meaning.


I think you were correct there, I tried using ctrl+F to look for "welfare chauvinism", but none. Maybe from the text to the left beside template of information where it mentions it is a welfare chauvinist party. [[Special:Contributions/75.113.159.27|75.113.159.27]] ([[User talk:75.113.159.27|talk]]) 12:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
African culture is founded within the continent of Africa, and the groups of that continent never in history referred to their cultures as “Black Culture”. Many didn’t and still don’t refer to themselves as Black. There cultures are such as Igbo culture, Zulu culture etc. per their ethnic groups.


==Spamming on [[List of snipers]]==
Black Culture is what African Americans named their culture as it emerged at the Harlem Renaissance and in the 1960s, coming out of the United States of America. They named their culture Black Culture because they had already referred to themselves as Black, unlike anyone on the African Continent or Caribbean. The later to places only referred to themselves by their ethnic group.


Hi,
This is noted is several historic documents and elders today around the globe. The issue isn’t if there are more black (as in race) around world. The point is that African American (Black American) (Black) in the USA and abroad refers automatically to African Americans because everyone knows the history and cultural context of Black Culture.
I have been watching this editor [[user:Alexwolf258]] who has been spamming the page [[List of snipers]] despite of you reverting his edit on the page, please have a look at this!! I was very tempted to give him a warning on his talk page but thought to inform you instead as you can handle it more better, cheers!!!


[[User:Spider1217|Spider1217]] ([[User talk:Spider1217|talk]]) 19:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
It has been an offense to call or rename “Zulu culture” or any other African or Caribbean CULTURE, Black Culture, when speaking of their ancient cultures. It is respectful to call it what it is, and not change it.
:{{u|Spider1217}} I think I don't want to get involved in that dispute. There are a lot of dubious information about snipers, so it comes down to if the sources are reliable. It is clear that Alexwolf258 has been [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]], so you could warn him about that if you want to. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


== Nat Turner ==
Black Culture is singular, not plural. African cultures are founded in Africa…. not saying by race many are not black, but a whole North side isn’t and many on the East are offended in being called Black. They are proud of their culture as Somali or Ethiopian Culture.


The latest discovery on Nat Turner identity.
People move into America and assimilate into Black Culture (African American culture), but they know their birth ethnicity and ethnic culture of parents.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/movies_tv/article/Demystifying-Nat-Turner-9881896.php [[User:Creolehombre2|Creolehombre2]] ([[User talk:Creolehombre2|talk]]) 15:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:I don't really care, but don't call your changes typo fixing or similar when they clearly are not. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 16:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)


== Languages ==
Ethnicity and broad “phenotype race” are different.
We are black people by race(what we look like) but African Culture (really should say cultures), is different than Black Culture which emerged in the USA in the 1900s. The other cultures were already alive and thriving for thousands of years prior.


I ask if it exist a new and updated source for the knowledge of european languages in all countries of European Union? Is it possible add it? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.22.181.146|79.22.181.146]] ([[User talk:79.22.181.146#top|talk]]) 18:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
AA have always referred to themselves as Black ie. Black History Month, Black Panthers, Black… this is unlike any other. People who are not of the phenotype black may not know this, but if one searches anywhere, online or off, the words Black Culture pulls up African American. The words African culture pulls of the wonderful cultures that are thousands of years old, founded in Africa.
:As far as I know the source https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1958/1(1)/2013-07-01 is up to date. Anyway, even if there is no other source, there is no reason for you to add unsourced text or to remove large blocks of text from the article. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 18:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
::[https://www.scuola.net/news/732/le-lingue-straniere-piu-insegnate-a-scuola Here] <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.22.181.146|79.22.181.146]] ([[User talk:79.22.181.146#top|talk]]) 21:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::That source doesn't look like it includes all languages, but if you can find the original report maybe you can use it in the '''Knowledge''' section. Please note that you changed the section about official languages in your last edit, and offical languages are different from knowledge of languages. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 04:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
::::However, the source is of 2012 or 2016. It said "Technical Specification" (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2016, in Europeans and their Languages (PDF). Special Eurobarometer 386 (Report). European Commission. June 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2016.". Maybe, it isn't so up to date I think. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.46.19.140|79.46.19.140]] ([[User talk:79.46.19.140#top|talk]]) 19:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== About National Popular Consciousness ==


I would like to clarify that although the party is clearly not referred to as neo-Nazi to given sources, [https://www.ekathimerini.com/politics/1239610/mep-lagos-admits-he-is-a-nazi/ its founder amd leader is a neo-Nazi]. I don't know what happens in this case, so I'll leave it up to you to do what you think. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Popular_Consciousness&diff=prev&oldid=1232531768 [[User:D.S. Lioness|D.S. Lioness]] ([[User talk:D.S. Lioness|talk]]) 18:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I am hoping you understand as I tried to explain as best I could. Thank you for your time. Be well. Sorry for any typos in this message because I didn’t look it over. [[Special:Contributions/172.75.146.57|172.75.146.57]] ([[User talk:172.75.146.57|talk]]) 21:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
:I have read your comment. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 20:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


== List of tracks gauge ==
::I see your point and it would be valid if [[Black culture]] was an article. In articles, editors come to a consensus about the scope of an article, i.e. what should be included and what should be left out. A defined scope makes the article more readable and less confusing when the article is about ''one'' subject.
::Disambiguation pages serve a purpose different from articles. The purpose of a disambiguation page (such as Black culture) is to direct a reader seeking information on a topic to the right page. This means that disambiguation pages contain links to articles on very different subjects. See for instance the page [[Black mold]] that links to three different molds, a musician's alias, a music album and a graphic novel series. That those links are found on the same page does not in any way suggest that they are the same. The links are there because someone typing "black mold" in the search bar is probably looking for something found in one of those links. Same with the page Black culture, where there should be links to what people are reasonably looking for when they search for "black culture". This would include the culture of black people in other countries than the US, and it is trivial to show that black culture does not always mean African American culture; that is a very US-centric viewpoint and Wikipedia seeks to present information from a global point of view. I hope that clears up any misunderstanding about what links on disambiguation pages mean. Happy editing![[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 19:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


Veteran courses, museums and preservation railways in Denmark:
== Help wanted with user. ==
* 1. Stenvad Mosebrug-Peat railway (Tørvebane).
* 2. Bunkermuseum Hanstholm.
* 3. Hjerl Hede.
* 4. Stenvad Mose.
* 5. Ree Park – America Express (Amerika Expressen).
* 6. Lille Vildmose, Dokkedal – Peat-train (Tørvetog).
* 7. Hedeland veteran course (veteran railway).
Existing narrow-gauge Danish industrial railways and active narrow-gauge railways in Denmark:
* 1. Østerbygård Dambrug.<ref>https://www.jernbanen.dk/forum2/index.php?mode=thread&id=78123</ref>
* 2. Fuglsø Mose.
* 3. Pindstrup Mosebrug.
* 4. Store Vildmose.


Why removing this? And I’m not Spidy30, and PS just remember be careful what you say about other peoples right Sjö, or a person you think I am without you having a single proof that I am this person but I am not at all Sjö. [[Special:Contributions/87.49.45.201|87.49.45.201]] ([[User talk:87.49.45.201|talk]]) 13:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, a user you’ve recently had dealings with is continuing to post spam links on various pages. In my personal opinion the user should be banned. Looking at their edit history, shows they have no interest in making useful contributions and instead will continue to cause disruption. I’m not entirely sure the user isn’t a bot. Could you please assist? Kind regards [[User:Lukejordan02|Lukejordan02]] ([[User talk:Lukejordan02|talk]]) 19:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
:For what it's worth I don't think he is a bot, just a person with poor English and no understanding of Wikipedia. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 08:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


:You can see here is a link right, and you say adding a reliable source, that is a lie because you have deleted contents with links and websites so I am not adding anything without links or websites or something like that. [[Special:Contributions/87.49.45.201|87.49.45.201]] ([[User talk:87.49.45.201|talk]]) 13:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
== Why did you revert my edits??? ==
::I hope you have a good explanation as to why you have removed this when there are links next to it? [[Special:Contributions/87.49.45.201|87.49.45.201]] ([[User talk:87.49.45.201|talk]]) 14:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
:::I answered at [[User talk:87.49.45.201]]. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 16:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)


== inclusion criteria ==
Why did you revert my edits when new IMF data proves that? And why didn't you revert edits to other Developed countries or do u only revert African countries? [[User:Nlivataye|Nlivataye]] ([[User talk:Nlivataye|talk]]) 11:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


hello, let's have a discussion on why you think my edits to the list of terrorism does not meet the inclusion criteria, thanks [[User:Rabawar|Rabawar]] ([[User talk:Rabawar|talk]]) 07:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:Well, I gave my reasons in the edit comments, and I'd be happy to explain them in more detail, but only after you answer a question: Do you think that my edit was motivated by racism, yes or no?
:The first point says that an attack should be described as terrorism by a consensus of reliable sources. I do not see that this is the case. Did you find [[WP:RS]] that call this a terrorist attack? [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:You have made several comments that to me seem to imply that white editors purposely and in bad faith downgrade the information on African countries, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AUkraine&diff=prev&oldid=1149498885&diffmode=source
::I found this article by the [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/20/hezbollah-pager-attacks-israel-lebanon-war/ Washington Post] a couple days ago, I'm sure I could find more sources but this is just the one I have on hand. it states: "Numerous international law experts, including a U.N. panel, accused Israel of violating international law and carrying out a form of terrorism, no matter that it was an attempt to weaken a known terrorist organization." I believe this constitutes a reliable source and is the reason why I think the explosions should be included in the list [[User:Rabawar|Rabawar]] ([[User talk:Rabawar|talk]]) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANlivataye&diff=prev&oldid=1146213142&diffmode=source
:::That is a WP:RS except that it might be an opinion piece, but I do not see a consensus of reliable sources. Also, since you have at least one WP:RS, I think that you should present your case at [[Talk:List of terrorist incidents in 2024]] to get a broader discussion. Individual user talk pages are not the best place for longer discussions on article content.[[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 08:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29_per_capita&diff=prev&oldid=1145528421&diffmode=source
::::youre right, I should bring this up on the talk page, in the meantime I'll look for more sources, the original source said that "numerous international law experts, including a U.N. panel, accused Israel" so I assumed that was a consensus but I'll find sources for the individual law experts and the U.N panel before introducing it to the talk page. thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me [[User:Rabawar|Rabawar]] ([[User talk:Rabawar|talk]]) 09:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AUkraine&diff=prev&oldid=1142988524&diffmode=source
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASwahili_language&diff=prev&oldid=1142779205&diffmode=source . Hence my question. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
== CS1 error on [[Coastal artillery]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that [[Special:Diff/1157978657|this edit]] performed by you, on the page [[:Coastal artillery]], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
* A "[[:Category:CS1 errors: bare URL|bare URL]] and [[:Category:CS1 errors: missing title|missing title]]" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coastal_artillery&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1157978657%7CCoastal%20artillery%5D%5D Ask for help])
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->[[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]] ([[User talk:Qwerfjkl (bot)|talk]]) 05:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


== Your beetle edit ==
== What "film" is ==


In reverting my question/correction in the text in [[2017 Stockholm truck attack]] you stated "'film' can mean electronic recordings". This flies in the face of the definition of the word. Would you please provide a cite to a durable, reputable source (in English)? [[User:JingleJim|JingleJim]] ([[User talk:JingleJim|talk]]) 13:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I noticed your concern about ''what-when-how.com'' as a source. The reference you removed from [[Beetle]] was copied from the Encyclopedia of Insects chapter on the Colorado potato beetle, which can be seen on [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Insects/Ip57QSMCRk4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Although+a+number+of+cultural+measures,+including+crop+rotation,+isolation+from+previous+potato+crops%22&pg=PA242&printsec=frontcover Google books]. Clearly there is no need to cite ''what-when-how.com'' when the original source is an alternative.


:For onstance https://www.filmconnection.com/reference-library/the-new-world-of-digital-filmmaking/ that talks about digital film or https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/film that makes no mention of any distinction between physical and digital filming. Do you have a source that says ”film” (in the sense of moving images) can only be used when the medium is a physical, moving, photosensitive strip of material? [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
However, when I went to add the citation, I saw that the article has nothing to do with the topic in the beetle article (the thorax). So not only is the source dubious, it is being used inappropriately. I don't see the point, but it seems some sort of spam exercise. —&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Arial;background:#d6ffe6;border:solid 1px;border-radius:5px;box-shadow:darkcyan 0px 1px 1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Jts1882|Jts1882]]&nbsp;&#124;[[User talk:Jts1882|&nbsp;talk]]&nbsp;</span> 10:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
:Well, I guess that the source ''looks'' reliable, since it often copies from reliable sources. I didn't check to see if most of the links were refspam added by one editor, but my gut feeling is that they were added by mistake by several well-meaning editors. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 16:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== John Yunshire's reverts ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Hi, thanks for restoring my additions on Soviet military occupations to [[military occupation]]. However, John Yunshire ([[Special:Contributions/John Yunshire]]) also reverted multiple other related edits, which I restored, related to history and the USSR/Russia. One of the most strange is his revert on [[Nostalgia for the Soviet Union]] where he restored the unsourced claim that the Russian government is "anti-communist". I do not what is the rationale for the user's reverts, while he claims to be pro-Ukraine. [[Special:Contributions/85.249.16.120|85.249.16.120]] ([[User talk:85.249.16.120|talk]]) 09:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
== CS1 error on [[Coastal artillery]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]]. I have '''automatically detected''' that [[Special:Diff/1157978657|this edit]] performed by you, on the page [[:Coastal artillery]], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
* A "[[:Category:CS1 errors: bare URL|bare URL]] and [[:Category:CS1 errors: missing title|missing title]]" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coastal_artillery&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1157978657%7CCoastal%20artillery%5D%5D Ask for help])
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a [[false positive]], you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->[[User:Qwerfjkl (bot)|Qwerfjkl (bot)]] ([[User talk:Qwerfjkl (bot)|talk]]) 11:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

== Red Rock ==

Please read the history about the Red Rock under the history about Red Reck on Wikipedia website with Red Rock beverages and please read also Red Rock today on Wikipedia website about [[Red Rock (beverage)]].

After the 1950s, the Red Rock Company seemed to vanish entirely and it is unknown when the company disestablished. An orphaned affiliate continued producing the product in the Dominican Republic, and it is now distributed there by the Cervecería Nacional Dominicana. The formulas for Red Rock's carbonated beverage products survive and are now owned by Sensient Technologies of Indianapolis, Indiana, which has its own network of distributors.[1]http://soda-pops.blogspot.com/2006/09/red-rock-cola_05.html?m=1
Clayton Distributors of Atlanta is a major distributor of Red Rock branded ginger ale and cola. [2]https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/1998/07/27/smallb1.html?page=2

So yes you are wrong. Yes That actually is also about the American brand but also the Dominican brand products.

please read the whole thing before you delete anything at all, just remember that okay

==Brand==
Red Rock Premium, Red Rock Cola, Red Rock Beverages and Red Rock Ginger Ale US only:
* Red Rock Cola Soda
* Red Rock Premium Cola Soda
* Red Rock Beverages Soda
* Red Rock Premium Beverages Soda
* Red Rock Premium Orange Soda
* Red Rock Premium Golden Ginger Ale Soda
* Red Rock Premium Peach Soda
* Red Rock Premium Grape Soda
* Red Rock Premium Root Beer Soda
Red Rock soft drinks Dominican Republic only:
* Red Rock Uva (Grape)
* Red Rock Chicle (Bubblegum)
* Red Rock Frambuesa (Raspberry)
* Red Rock Manzana Verde (Green Apple)
* Red Rock Naranja (Orange)
* Red Rock Merengue (Meringue)
* Red Rock Azul (Blue)
<ref>https://www.cnd.com.do/marcas/no-alcoholicos</ref><ref>https://soda-loverswiki.fandom.com/wiki/Red_Rock_Blue</ref><ref>https://www.behance.net/gallery/16897647/Red-Rock-Blue</ref> [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 14:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
:Nothing suggests that these are the same company. Do not hijack an article to add unrelated (except for the name) content. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 14:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
::Because that thing is only for the US and some of the products is only Dominican republic, I cannot see the big deal here right and but anyway, this product is only made for the Dominican Republic. And if you find some other articles on the Internet, they say the same thing about this company only few products is made in the US and the other products is only made into the Dominican Republic only for Dominican Republic. [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 14:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
::And that has nothing to do with any hijacks at all, I don’t know why you’re talking about this? [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 14:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
:::But anyways,this product it’s just it in the Dominican Republic you could ask can you Dominicans in your own country, about some of this or maybe some embassy in your country the Dominican embassy about this awesome buddy related to the Dominican Republic they will probably say the same thing just what I did right now [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 14:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
::::That thing has nothing to do with that hijack at all of course you haft to use articles for all things here on Wikipedia or if not, that thing will be remove it without any reliable sources at all and but should read some other articles as well and they say a lot of those things about the American product and the Dominican product and what is available and what is not the Dominican Republic at all Red Rock and Red Rock have only made this product only for the Dominican Republic, only because I know it I have been into Dominican republic many times, because I am a part Dominican yes half Dominican. And I have been seeing this product with my own eyes. And tasted it. Have you ever been in this country before because if not sure, please travel to the Dominican Republic and see that with your own eyes, and all the other products and things from the Dominican Republic and a lot of different flowers, plants and animals that only exist in that area is the country and also in Haiti. Just remember that not all is on the Internet and the only information and history about things it’s not available on the Internet you have to see that for yourself and experience things and afterwards you can judge things based on that, so please try to Dominican Republic and enjoy your journey if you are traveling to the Dominican Republic maybe now or maybe in the future so please enjoy the Dominican Republic if you do that of course take care. [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 15:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
:::That you were saying about hijack is just some nonsense and some bullshit. You say nothing indicates that it is not the same company behind these products, but it is and some of these products are only made for the American market and the others are only made for the Dominican market Try to check it yourself because the name of the product is basically the same and you are not allowed to use the same name for soft drinks due to copyrights and but try to read it again on Wikipedia on the website about Red Rock and other websites with the information you need about this [[Special:Contributions/91.100.157.11|91.100.157.11]] ([[User talk:91.100.157.11|talk]]) 17:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

That thing has nothing to do with that hijack at all of course you haft to use articles for all things here on Wikipedia or if not, that thing will be remove it without any reliable sources at all and but should read some other articles as well and they say a lot of those things about the American product and the Dominican product and what is available and what is not the Dominican Republic at all Red Rock and Red Rock have only made this product only for the Dominican Republic, only because I know it I have been into Dominican republic many times, because I am a part Dominican yes half Dominican. And I have been seeing this product with my own eyes. And tasted it. Have you ever been in this country before because if not sure, please travel to the Dominican Republic and see that with your own eyes, and all the other products and things from the Dominican Republic and a lot of different flowers, plants and animals that only exist in that area is the country and also in Haiti.

{{Reflist-talk}}

== Re Dirlewagner ==

See [[WP:LTA/GRP]]. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 18:07, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks, I figured it was something like that even if I couldn't find the user name. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 18:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

== Chris Brown edits ==

im Just rollbacking the edits of Sockpuppet Giubbotto non ortodosso [[User:Aardlion67|Aardlion67]] ([[User talk:Aardlion67|talk]]) 18:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
:After looking at the article histories I can say that is B.S. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 18:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aardwolf68 my barn star] from my main account says otherwise you weirdo <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aardlion67|Aardlion67]] ([[User talk:Aardlion67#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardlion67|contribs]]) 18:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> you can try to block me as much as you want, I still got my other account regular dumb swedish. Is it cold out there!

== Shamier Little ==

Please refrain from threats of blocking before doing your research. You reverted an edit about [[Shamier Little]]'s PB. It actually stands now (as I entered it) as 49.68s. She ran it in a second-place loss to Natalia Kaczmarek at the Monaco 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsLuOzk2pDQ&pp=ygUTc2hhbWllciBsaXR0bGUgNDAwbQ%3D%3D

Change it back, or I will. [[Special:Contributions/72.174.131.123|72.174.131.123]] ([[User talk:72.174.131.123|talk]]) 04:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
:I call edits as I see them based on evidence I can find. Your edit was unsourced, but I made an attempt to find a source. I looked at the date and location you gave which were ''London'' and ''23 July 2023''. Shamier Little did not run that distance on that date, which is why I reverted it and explained why in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shamier_Little&diff=next&oldid=1166846026 the edit comment]. I also warned you since, as far as I could see at the time, you had added incorrect information.

:Please go ahead and add the PB, but with the correct date and location. The data also needs a source. However, the video you linked is unavailable in my location. There must be another source, right? [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
::Adding incorrect or incomplete information doesn't warrant a Block. That's why we edit. Here's a another source; it's text with an embedded video, but it also references the same YouTube video. https://www.yardbarker.com/general_sports/articles/watch_natalia_kaczmarek_glides_by_shamier_little_to_win_400m_in_monaco/s1_15557_39043386 [[Special:Contributions/72.174.131.123|72.174.131.123]] ([[User talk:72.174.131.123|talk]]) 07:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
:::Since it is the same video it still unavailable at my location, and the text says nothing about Little's time. Try the results page for the event.
:::And for the warning, I (and other editors) factor in an editor's previous edits and warnings in the decision about a warning. As you had an earlier warning, as well as other questionable additions of unsourced/incorrect information, I think that the warning was appropriate given the information I had at the time. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

== Request for Inclusion of External Link on Wikipedia Page ==

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I am writing to request the addition of an external link to a reputable website that I believe would be valuable to Wikipedia readers and users. My website, [https://www.englishstory.in/], is a reliable and informative resource related to Short Story

As an enthusiastic contributor and advocate for sharing knowledge, I have noticed that the Wikipedia page on this Short story Wikipedia lacks a link to my website, which I believe could significantly enhance the available information for interested readers. My website provides unique insights, in-depth analysis story making it a valuable complement to the existing content on Wikipedia.

To maintain transparency and uphold the principles of verifiability and neutrality, I would like to clarify that while I am the owner of Englishstory, my primary intention is to offer useful and credible information to the community, rather than promoting any commercial interests. The content on my website adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines, and I believe it could serve as an authoritative source for users seeking additional information.

I kindly request that you consider adding my website as an external link on the Wikipedia page for relevant topic. The inclusion of this link would not only improve the depth of knowledge available to readers but also contribute to a more comprehensive and informative article on [relevant topic].

Please find the relevant details below:

Website Title: Englishstory

Website URL: https://www.englishstory.in/

Brief Description: We provides the story which people love to read and enhance their knowledge

If necessary, I am open to providing any additional information or answering any questions you may have about my website's content, credibility, or intent.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the possibility of seeing my website's link included on the Wikipedia page and contributing positively to the knowledge-sharing ecosystem of Wikipedia.

Sincerely,

Bishnupriya [[User:Bishnupriya9861|Bishnupriya9861]] ([[User talk:Bishnupriya9861|talk]]) 11:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

:That is not my call to make. Please familiarise yourself with the relevant policies (linked on your user talk page) and make the request at [[Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard]]. You will also want to read [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] since you call it "my website". [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 12:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

== "[[:Poor country]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Poor_country&redirect=no Poor country]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22#Poor country}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Crashed greek|Crashed greek]] ([[User talk:Crashed greek|talk]]) 04:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

== that attack name ==

My apologies. I accidentally reported that attack username under '''your'' username. Ignore the ping, it's already fixed. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 05:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

== Your edit on Yunarmiya ==

Hello, Sjo. Do you speak Russian or Ukrainian? If not, why did you revert my edit on Yunarmiya page? The sentence misrepresented the article. [[User:F.Alexsandr|F.Alexsandr]] ([[User talk:F.Alexsandr|talk]]) 16:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
:I don't speak Ukrainian and very little Russian. But even considering the errors that Google Translate can make, I see nothing in the article that suggests that the link says that it is about conscription. The lede indicates that they could be recruited as members of the organization. "Due to the lack of manpower to replenish the ranks of the occupying army, the leadership of the Kremlin is considering the possibility of involving 17-18-year-old members of the Russian children's and youth military organization "Unarmiya" in combat operations." It also clearly indicates that 17-year-old members could be put in combat, which is a noteworthy fact that you removed.
:If you insist, I am sure someone at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine]] could take a look at the source and tell us if it says something about conscription. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 17:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
::Ah. I see. So you dont speak the language and unable to verify on your own. The order in question (which we dont even know if genuine but lets say it is) clearly states that "...and also assess the potential of attracting (using) members of the Yunarmiya aged 17 to 18 years towards (in) conducting a special military operation on the territory of Ukraine after their conscription for military service in the spring and autumn conscriptions of 2022." Conscription in Russian armed forces starts after 18. As such the article (and even more so the wikipedia sentence) misrepresents the source. Of course you can ask for help from other people who understand the language, but since you deleted my contribution without looking on the source, i will be reverting your edit. [[User:F.Alexsandr|F.Alexsandr]] ([[User talk:F.Alexsandr|talk]]) 23:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
:::I don't doubt your language skills, but I do doubt that you let the article describe what secondary sources say. Instead, it appears that you use the Russian [[Wikipedia:PRIMARY|primary source]] to make your own interpretation. I will ask for a third opinion. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 05:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

==Taylor Guitars==
Hello, Sjo. I understand you may think my edit to the Taylor Guitar page was unconstructive, but I do not agree. Please stop being annoying. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.132.163.34|68.132.163.34]] ([[User talk:68.132.163.34#top|talk]]) 14:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:If you add unsourced text and you personal opinions to an article, you can expect it to be reverted. Especially if your edit history shows that you use to vandalize articles. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 14:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

== Assault Weapon Terminology ==

Hey Sjo!
I'm not sure if you remember me, I made some edits the other day on some american gun law pages, mostly editing out "assault weapon" and replacing it with "semi-automatic weapon". I have since learned a little more about the process for contributing to wikipedia, and I wanted to apologize for just jumping on and making edits without any backgeound work. I am genuinely concerned about the language used from a technical and politically accurate sense, as "assault weapon" is generally a politically charged term that isn't historically used in that way. Breaching tools like shotguns would fall more into that category if anything. Would you have any advice for how I can contribute to this, or better contribute to discussion on whether or not to make these alterations? [[Special:Contributions/2601:444:382:FC20:7E3C:FB95:C3C6:4D2C|2601:444:382:FC20:7E3C:FB95:C3C6:4D2C]] ([[User talk:2601:444:382:FC20:7E3C:FB95:C3C6:4D2C|talk]]) 05:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

:Here's a good (non-partisan) look at AR-15's specifically if you're interested!
:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U8iDGmJ-Bs [[Special:Contributions/2601:444:382:FC20:D51F:4FCF:10DC:B66D|2601:444:382:FC20:D51F:4FCF:10DC:B66D]] ([[User talk:2601:444:382:FC20:D51F:4FCF:10DC:B66D|talk]]) 17:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>


</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Diamyd Medical]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


== Troublemaker Pillowpeanut ==
The article [[:Diamyd Medical]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Insufficiently notable'''</blockquote>


Thank you for reverting the edits made by their socks. Already reported at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pillowpeanut]] by Z. Patterson on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Z._Patterson#c-Z._Patterson-20241222072500-CSMention269-20241222072100] ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️<sup>([[User talk:CSMention269|🗨️]] ● [[Special:EmailUser/CSMention269|✉️]] ● [[Special:Contributions/CSMention269|📔]])</sup> 07:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
:Thanks. i saw that after I reported them at WP:AIV. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


== Mudvayne ==
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Diamyd Medical|the article's talk page]].


Hello,
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Bon courage|Bon courage]] ([[User talk:Bon courage|talk]]) 09:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


The edit to "Dig" by Mudvayne is due to the "brbr deng" meme being an explicit reference to the bassist's slapping ("brbr") and popping ("deng") techniques. Reverting the change makes the explanation less clear and more general.
== Why did you revert my edits? Give reasons. ==


Please leave as-is. :) [[User:Confoozled37|Confoozled37]] ([[User talk:Confoozled37|talk]]) 03:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
On what basis did you claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives? And explain why my edits were not suitable for lede, when it is just introducing the concept of ownership as the article should in its opening.
[[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 06:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

:The lede should be an overview of the article and reflect what is in the body of the article. It should not introduce new information, and what information is there should be presented in an accessible way. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::You missed a point. On what basis did you make the claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives and therefore biased? Just because the name of the book is Socialism, on that basis?
::Second Point
::What part of it is "new information"? My edits were just expounding on the topic of ownership in such a way that was very accessible and introductory. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::That ownership is only related to economic goods is a questionable view and I believe not the general opinion. The differentation between legal, sociological and economic ownership is less problematic, but the reasoning about "having" seems to be specific to this particular philosopher. And it is absolutely not accessible. However, if you think the text should be included I think that you should start a discussion about the addition at [[Talk:Ownership]]. My talk page is not the place to discuss article content. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 06:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Are you even thinking before replying?
::::What is written at the very initial of the article?
::::"possession of property that may be any asset tangible or intangible".
::::What property do you know that does not have an economic value? Property is an asset be it in control of an individual or the government or state, and therefore an economic good. Most, if not all property is an economic good.
::::And you said "reasoning of having seems unique to that particular philosopher"?
::::My edit just talked about ''possession'', and that possession of something does not mean that the possessor has the ownership of it. Example - A thief stealing something does not make the thing its, and that the law recognises this. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 07:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Please discuss article content on the article talk page. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::I am not here to discuss article content, I am here to ask on what basis you removed mine? And that's your reply? You just dodged everything. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 07:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::You are discussing article content. This is the wrong place. Take it to the article talk page. Please stop posting here. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 07:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::You removed my edits and now you are telling me to go to talk page and yalk there? Yes thats the best dodge i have ever seen. I dont think you will address any points I made. [[User:Adityaverma8998|Adityaverma8998]] ([[User talk:Adityaverma8998|talk]]) 08:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

== [[Split rock of Horeb]] ==

Thanks for catching that. Glad to see you've seen the article, which doesn't show any signs of notability as the sources only have one line mentions. What do you think? I've warned the editor about falsely labelling edits as fixing typos. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 13:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
:I made a quick Google search to see if there was any reliable source about the scholars and archaeologists claim, and I got lots of hits to religious sites. Going back, I can see that there seems to be no reliable sources at all in that search. I think that the article at least qualifies for a PROD. [[User:Sjö|Sjö]] ([[User talk:Sjö#top|talk]]) 17:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
::It now has only one source as Newsweek is not longer considered reliable so I removed it.[[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Newsweek (2013-present)]]. See [[Rephidim]], a pretty bad article. One source there is bad but interesting as it says it might not be able to identify it. Then there is [[Mount Horeb]]. Again not an RS, [https://doubtingthomasresearch.com/split-rock-battlefield-rephidim/], I tried this search of Google books [https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=286f218df0db1919&sxsrf=ACQVn09sR0zYP3gm3orpvf3vnQcnpT2BIg:1711035167987&q=%22Split+Rock%22+Moses&tbm=bks&source=lnms&prmd=ivmnbtz&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0_Irb1oWFAxURSkEAHV1HCvMQ0pQJegQIVhAB&biw=1046&bih=466&dpr=1.84] but to my horror I found I've messed up my display and I can't read previews. Everything has a blue background and I only see partial bits. Anyway, stopping now for my treadmill work. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 15:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

== My edits on Sweden Democrats ==

I think you were correct there, I tried using ctrl+F to look for "welfare chauvinism", but none. Maybe from the text to the left beside template of information where it mentions it is a welfare chauvinist party. [[Special:Contributions/75.113.159.27|75.113.159.27]] ([[User talk:75.113.159.27|talk]]) 12:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:42, 24 December 2024

I prefer to keep conversations together and usually respond here, so please watch this page for my reply. I move old conversations to the archive, usually once a year.

To leave a message on this page, please click here.


Why did you revert my edits? Give reasons.

[edit]

On what basis did you claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives? And explain why my edits were not suitable for lede, when it is just introducing the concept of ownership as the article should in its opening. Adityaverma8998 (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lede should be an overview of the article and reflect what is in the body of the article. It should not introduce new information, and what information is there should be presented in an accessible way. Sjö (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You missed a point. On what basis did you make the claim that my edits were socialistic perspectives and therefore biased? Just because the name of the book is Socialism, on that basis?
Second Point
What part of it is "new information"? My edits were just expounding on the topic of ownership in such a way that was very accessible and introductory. Adityaverma8998 (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That ownership is only related to economic goods is a questionable view and I believe not the general opinion. The differentation between legal, sociological and economic ownership is less problematic, but the reasoning about "having" seems to be specific to this particular philosopher. And it is absolutely not accessible. However, if you think the text should be included I think that you should start a discussion about the addition at Talk:Ownership. My talk page is not the place to discuss article content. Sjö (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you even thinking before replying?
What is written at the very initial of the article?
"possession of property that may be any asset tangible or intangible".
What property do you know that does not have an economic value? Property is an asset be it in control of an individual or the government or state, and therefore an economic good. Most, if not all property is an economic good.
And you said "reasoning of having seems unique to that particular philosopher"?
My edit just talked about possession, and that possession of something does not mean that the possessor has the ownership of it. Example - A thief stealing something does not make the thing its, and that the law recognises this. Adityaverma8998 (talk) 07:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss article content on the article talk page. Sjö (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not here to discuss article content, I am here to ask on what basis you removed mine? And that's your reply? You just dodged everything. Adityaverma8998 (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are discussing article content. This is the wrong place. Take it to the article talk page. Please stop posting here. Sjö (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You removed my edits and now you are telling me to go to talk page and yalk there? Yes thats the best dodge i have ever seen. I dont think you will address any points I made. Adityaverma8998 (talk) 08:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split rock of Horeb

[edit]

Thanks for catching that. Glad to see you've seen the article, which doesn't show any signs of notability as the sources only have one line mentions. What do you think? I've warned the editor about falsely labelling edits as fixing typos. Doug Weller talk 13:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a quick Google search to see if there was any reliable source about the scholars and archaeologists claim, and I got lots of hits to religious sites. Going back, I can see that there seems to be no reliable sources at all in that search. I think that the article at least qualifies for a PROD. Sjö (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It now has only one source as Newsweek is not longer considered reliable so I removed it.Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Newsweek (2013-present). See Rephidim, a pretty bad article. One source there is bad but interesting as it says it might not be able to identify it. Then there is Mount Horeb. Again not an RS, [1], I tried this search of Google books [2] but to my horror I found I've messed up my display and I can't read previews. Everything has a blue background and I only see partial bits. Anyway, stopping now for my treadmill work. Doug Weller talk 15:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edits on Sweden Democrats

[edit]

I think you were correct there, I tried using ctrl+F to look for "welfare chauvinism", but none. Maybe from the text to the left beside template of information where it mentions it is a welfare chauvinist party. 75.113.159.27 (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming on List of snipers

[edit]

Hi, I have been watching this editor user:Alexwolf258 who has been spamming the page List of snipers despite of you reverting his edit on the page, please have a look at this!! I was very tempted to give him a warning on his talk page but thought to inform you instead as you can handle it more better, cheers!!!

Spider1217 (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spider1217 I think I don't want to get involved in that dispute. There are a lot of dubious information about snipers, so it comes down to if the sources are reliable. It is clear that Alexwolf258 has been edit warring, so you could warn him about that if you want to. Sjö (talk) 06:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Turner

[edit]

The latest discovery on Nat Turner identity. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/movies_tv/article/Demystifying-Nat-Turner-9881896.php Creolehombre2 (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care, but don't call your changes typo fixing or similar when they clearly are not. Sjö (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

[edit]

I ask if it exist a new and updated source for the knowledge of european languages in all countries of European Union? Is it possible add it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.22.181.146 (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know the source https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1958/1(1)/2013-07-01 is up to date. Anyway, even if there is no other source, there is no reason for you to add unsourced text or to remove large blocks of text from the article. Sjö (talk) 18:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.22.181.146 (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That source doesn't look like it includes all languages, but if you can find the original report maybe you can use it in the Knowledge section. Please note that you changed the section about official languages in your last edit, and offical languages are different from knowledge of languages. Sjö (talk) 04:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, the source is of 2012 or 2016. It said "Technical Specification" (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2016, in Europeans and their Languages (PDF). Special Eurobarometer 386 (Report). European Commission. June 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 January 2016.". Maybe, it isn't so up to date I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.46.19.140 (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I would like to clarify that although the party is clearly not referred to as neo-Nazi to given sources, its founder amd leader is a neo-Nazi. I don't know what happens in this case, so I'll leave it up to you to do what you think. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Popular_Consciousness&diff=prev&oldid=1232531768 D.S. Lioness (talk) 18:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have read your comment. Sjö (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of tracks gauge

[edit]

Veteran courses, museums and preservation railways in Denmark:

  • 1. Stenvad Mosebrug-Peat railway (Tørvebane).
  • 2. Bunkermuseum Hanstholm.
  • 3. Hjerl Hede.
  • 4. Stenvad Mose.
  • 5. Ree Park – America Express (Amerika Expressen).
  • 6. Lille Vildmose, Dokkedal – Peat-train (Tørvetog).
  • 7. Hedeland veteran course (veteran railway).

Existing narrow-gauge Danish industrial railways and active narrow-gauge railways in Denmark:

  • 1. Østerbygård Dambrug.[1]
  • 2. Fuglsø Mose.
  • 3. Pindstrup Mosebrug.
  • 4. Store Vildmose.

Why removing this? And I’m not Spidy30, and PS just remember be careful what you say about other peoples right Sjö, or a person you think I am without you having a single proof that I am this person but I am not at all Sjö. 87.49.45.201 (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can see here is a link right, and you say adding a reliable source, that is a lie because you have deleted contents with links and websites so I am not adding anything without links or websites or something like that. 87.49.45.201 (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you have a good explanation as to why you have removed this when there are links next to it? 87.49.45.201 (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I answered at User talk:87.49.45.201. Sjö (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

inclusion criteria

[edit]

hello, let's have a discussion on why you think my edits to the list of terrorism does not meet the inclusion criteria, thanks Rabawar (talk) 07:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first point says that an attack should be described as terrorism by a consensus of reliable sources. I do not see that this is the case. Did you find WP:RS that call this a terrorist attack? Sjö (talk) 07:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found this article by the Washington Post a couple days ago, I'm sure I could find more sources but this is just the one I have on hand. it states: "Numerous international law experts, including a U.N. panel, accused Israel of violating international law and carrying out a form of terrorism, no matter that it was an attempt to weaken a known terrorist organization." I believe this constitutes a reliable source and is the reason why I think the explosions should be included in the list Rabawar (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a WP:RS except that it might be an opinion piece, but I do not see a consensus of reliable sources. Also, since you have at least one WP:RS, I think that you should present your case at Talk:List of terrorist incidents in 2024 to get a broader discussion. Individual user talk pages are not the best place for longer discussions on article content.Sjö (talk) 08:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
youre right, I should bring this up on the talk page, in the meantime I'll look for more sources, the original source said that "numerous international law experts, including a U.N. panel, accused Israel" so I assumed that was a consensus but I'll find sources for the individual law experts and the U.N panel before introducing it to the talk page. thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me Rabawar (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What "film" is

[edit]

In reverting my question/correction in the text in 2017 Stockholm truck attack you stated "'film' can mean electronic recordings". This flies in the face of the definition of the word. Would you please provide a cite to a durable, reputable source (in English)? JingleJim (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For onstance https://www.filmconnection.com/reference-library/the-new-world-of-digital-filmmaking/ that talks about digital film or https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/film that makes no mention of any distinction between physical and digital filming. Do you have a source that says ”film” (in the sense of moving images) can only be used when the medium is a physical, moving, photosensitive strip of material? Sjö (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Troublemaker Pillowpeanut

[edit]

Thank you for reverting the edits made by their socks. Already reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pillowpeanut by Z. Patterson on [3] ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 07:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. i saw that after I reported them at WP:AIV. Sjö (talk) 07:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mudvayne

[edit]

Hello,

The edit to "Dig" by Mudvayne is due to the "brbr deng" meme being an explicit reference to the bassist's slapping ("brbr") and popping ("deng") techniques. Reverting the change makes the explanation less clear and more general.

Please leave as-is. :) Confoozled37 (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://www.jernbanen.dk/forum2/index.php?mode=thread&id=78123
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjö&oldid=1264906577"