Jump to content

User talk:Praxidicae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1258281895 by MediaWiki message delivery (Restorer)
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 123: Line 123:
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 -->


== SABIS Revision ==
== New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive ==


Hello, we edited the SABIS Wiki page to correct the truncated sentence from the first paragraph and to accurately reflect the correct number of countries SABIS operates in. I am with the SABIS US office and know the revision to be correct.
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''[[Wikipedia:New Page Patrol|New Page Patrol]] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|[[File:NPP Barnstar.png|right|75px]]
|-
|
* On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Each review will earn 1 point.
* Interested in taking part? '''[[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/January 2024/Participants|Sign up here]]'''.
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here.]]
|}
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1190722499 -->


We also corrected the official website to reflect the current web address.
== Can you suggest changes on this biography article? ==

Hello @[[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]], You reviewed my Draft of mine yesterday. Thank you for taking the time! For the last 2 months, I’ve been taking advice from several editors to help me write my first biography articles. I learn at each stage, and really appreciate the time taken. This was the first time I submitted my draft on Deron Triff. You mentioned both the tone and sources in the rejection. I am already working to address this. (I had received feedback to make the article more about the person than his companies. It was good advice but I think I went too far). One challenge that I don’t know how to solve is how to fill in professional details that aren’t mentioned in news articles? An example is the exact dates he worked for different companies. I was using a primary source for those. (A LinkedIn profile) Is there a better way to do it?  Thank you in advance. [[User:Podcast Lover|Podcast Lover]] ([[User talk:Podcast Lover|talk]]) 16:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not revert our last update.
:{{tps|br}} {{replyto|Podcast Lover}} {{tq|"how to fill in professional details that aren’t mentioned in news articles"}} Wikipedia only communicates what [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say. The media will always miss some facets of a subject and that's ok. [[WP:TRUTH|Here it does not matter what is actually true]]. Why are those details necessary? <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span></span> 16:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

::Thank you @[[User:Chris troutman|Chris troutman]]. Your question above is freeing. Why are those details necessary? Maybe the details are not necessary! I had not come across that essay before. It's a different way of looking at the world, and I think it will really help me. Thank you! [[User:Podcast Lover|Podcast Lover]] ([[User talk:Podcast Lover|talk]]) 16:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/75.146.43.25|75.146.43.25]] ([[User talk:75.146.43.25|talk]]) 18:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{tpw}} Who is this "we" that you speak of? Do you have a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] with SABIS? [[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]) 19:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] asking the right questions. ❤️ [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(darkred, red, Firebrick, DarkGreen, Green, ForestGreen)">GRINCHIDICAE🎄</span>]] 23:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Miss ya Praxie! Feel free to come down to DC some time! Coffee's on me to warm that grinchy heart! [[User:Bkissin|Bkissin]] ([[User talk:Bkissin|talk]]) 22:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
::::I don't drink coffee, but I will accept wine or vodka :P Shoot me an email or I'll shoot you one! I'm totally down. I like escaping the toddler hell I'm in. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(chocolate, Peru, Sienna, Rosybrown, olive, goldenrod)">TURKIDICAE🦃</span>]] 20:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 -->

Latest revision as of 03:53, 22 November 2024

"Cause I've met some people, okay? Real people, and I've got to tell you, a lot of them are fucking idiots" - Selina Meyer
"Even in Zero gravity, you're an asshole" - Cyril Figgis

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

[edit]

Hello Praxidicae,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Happy New Year, Praxidicae

[edit]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello Praxidicae,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello Praxidicae,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

SABIS Revision

[edit]

Hello, we edited the SABIS Wiki page to correct the truncated sentence from the first paragraph and to accurately reflect the correct number of countries SABIS operates in. I am with the SABIS US office and know the revision to be correct.

We also corrected the official website to reflect the current web address.

Please do not revert our last update.

Thank you. 75.146.43.25 (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Who is this "we" that you speak of? Do you have a conflict of interest with SABIS? Bkissin (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bkissin asking the right questions. ❤️ GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Miss ya Praxie! Feel free to come down to DC some time! Coffee's on me to warm that grinchy heart! Bkissin (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't drink coffee, but I will accept wine or vodka :P Shoot me an email or I'll shoot you one! I'm totally down. I like escaping the toddler hell I'm in. TURKIDICAE🦃 20:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]