John Mearsheimer bibliography: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:32, 1 July 2024

This is a list of works by John Mearsheimer. In his later years, he focused increasingly on current events.^[1]

Thesis[edit]

Mearsheimer, John J. (August 1981). The Theory and Practice of Conventional Deterrence (Thesis). Ithaca: Cornell University.

Articles[edit]

Journal articles[edit]

— (1979). "Precision-guided munitions and conventional deterrence". Survival. 21 (2): 68–76. doi:10.1080/00396337908441802. ISSN 0039-6338.
- Criticised by Dan Gouré and Gordon McCormick the following year,^[2] published with a rejoinder by Mearsheimer.^[3] Referenced in several later studies on the topic but without extensive discussion: by Robert Mandel,^[4] David Blagden,^[5] Lauren Kahn and Michael C. Horowitz.^[6]
— (1981). "The British Generals Talk: A Review Essay". International Security. 6 (1): 165–184. doi:10.1162/isec.6.1.165 (inactive 2024-06-27). ISSN 0162-2889.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of June 2024 (link)
— (1982). "Maneuver, Mobile Defense, and the NATO Central Front". International Security. 6 (3): 104–122. doi:10.2307/2538609. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538609.
- Described by Barry Posen as "a critical discussion of the possible tactical implications of the military reformers' prescriptions for ground warfare"^[7] and regarded as important though not convincing by David P. Calleo,^[8] it was referenced in the first years after its publication,^[9] but its first detailed critique came from Joshua M. Epstein^[10] and several others in the context of the replacement of combined arms with maneuver doctrine in the United States Armed Forces around 1989^[11] and in the context of NATO's tactical future after the First Cold War.^[12] It has seen occasional treatments in retrospective literature since that time.^[13]
Mearsheimer, John J.; Schoenbaum, David (1982-01-04). "Correspondence: Clausewitz and the British Generals". International Security. 6 (3): 223–229. doi:10.2307/2538616. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538616.
— (1982). "Why the Soviets Can't Win Quickly in Central Europe" (PDF). International Security. 7 (1): 3–39. doi:10.2307/2538686. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538686.
- Also published as a chapter of Conventional Deterrence in 1983. The context of the article was described in Matthews 1996,^[14] as standing in opposition US president Ronald Reagan's strengtening of NATO forces in Europe, supported by Samuel P. Huntington^[15] (who had initially reviewed Mearsheimer's article favourably)^[16]^: 28 and others.^[17] Also relevant was the debate over whether or not the US nuclear weapons in West Germany were necessary.^[18] Positively received by Posen and Evera 1983,^[19]^: 15 Brauch and Unterseher 1984,^[20]^: 195 Lübkemeier 1985,^[21]^: 250 Dean 1986^[22] and to some extent Weinstein 1983,^[23]^: 22–23 and Strachan 1985^[24] and Simpson 1985.^[25]^: 85 Its conclusions were opposed on methodological grounds by Jack Snyder^[26] and with alternative models by William Kaufmann,^[27] William Mako^[28] and Andrew Hamilton.^[29]^: 125 With the exception of Corcoran 1983,^[30]^: 9–10 most concrete opposition did not come until three separate articles published in 1988 by Snyder,^[31] by Joshua Epstein^[10] and by Eliot A. Cohen,^[32] building on an earlier review by Aaron Friedberg.^[33] Although the reception that year was not entirely negative,^[34]^[35]^: 141^[36]^: 92 most papers published in the immediate aftermath of these were critical.^[37]^: 535^[38] Employed favourably in some retrospective analyses.^[39]^[40]^: 3 That by Barry D. Watts, then director of the Northrop Grumman Analysis Center, relayed Cohen's criticisms.^[41] The 2016 review by military Kenton White criticised it for not taking USSR and general WTO airborne capabilities^[a] or their OMG concept, while following Cohen in arguing for an alternative view that the WTO might have been able to prepare a "standing start"^[b] attack undetected enough for the resulting delay to allow for the WTO to potentially collapse part of the NATO front, which Mearsheimer had argued was not a danger.^[44] White followed this up in more detail in 2017.^[45] A less detailed critique was published by international relations professor Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou.^[46] The approach of Cohen and Kenton was in turn criticised in the overview of Tecott and Halterman, which defended Mearsheimer while warning about his "over-extrapolation" on the basis of a single scenario,^[42] echoing Richard Stoll's 1990 defense of Mearsheimer's article to justify further model-based approaches.^[47] But outside the context of the debate^[48] and with the passage of time, the article began to see uncritical use,^[49]^[50] especially with the successful urban defences of the Russo-Ukrainian War.^[51]^[52]^: 57 More widely read than his previous studies, it is this study along with his 1983 book that propelled him onto the academic scene as an "Optimist"^[c] in their debate with the "Pessimists",^[54] which has been termed the "Great Debate" in security circles,^[55]^: 20 in which moderate Pessimists held a majority.^[56]^: 38

The credibility of NATO’s defences was analysed and discussed ... Many of the contemporary analyses looked at strategy or numbers, taking a wholesale approach, but failed to address the overall capability based on existing force structures. An example is the analysis given by Dr J Mearsheimer, which provides an example contemporary to the period. It provides a useful perspective on the difficulties inherent in assessing the credibility of defence policy from a purely academic standpoint.
— Kenton White, Credibility Analysis – Mearsheimer’s viewpoint (2016)

— (1983). "The Military Reform Movement: A Critical Assessment". Orbis: A Journal for World Affairs. 27 (2): 285–300. ISSN 0030-4387.
— (1984). "Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in Europe" (PDF). International Security. 9 (3): 19–46. doi:10.2307/2538586. JSTOR 2538586.
— (1985). "Prospects for Conventional Deterrenc in Europe" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 41 (7): 158–162. Bibcode:1985BuAtS..41g.158M. doi:10.1080/00963402.1985.11456021. ISSN 0096-3402.
— (1986). "A Strategic Misstep: The Maritime Strategy and Deterrence in Europe". International Security. 11 (2): 3–57. doi:10.2307/2538957. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538957.
— (1988). "Numbers, Strategy, and the European Balance". International Security. 12 (4): 174–185. doi:10.2307/2539001. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539001.
Mearsheimer, John J. (1989). "Assessing the Conventional Balance: The 3:1 Rule and Its Critics". International Security. 13 (4): 54–89. doi:10.2307/2538780. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538780.
- This article was published in response to criticisms of Mearsheimer's application of the 3:1 rule as expressed and used in Why the Soviets Can't Win Quickly in Central Europe. One of its chief critics, Jeffrey Epstein, published a rebuttal that year.^[57] A detailed mathematical evaluation of the 3:1 rule, which Mearsheimer first examined in 1982, would not come until Kress and Talmor 1999.^[58]
Mearsheimer, John J.; Posen, Barry R.; Cohen, Eliot A. (1989). "Reassessing Net Assessment". International Security. 13 (4): 128–179. doi:10.2307/2538782. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538782.
— (1990). "Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War" (PDF). International Security. 15 (1): 5–56. doi:10.2307/2538981. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538981.
- The article's thesis turned out to be incorrect, but the article itself was retrospectively praised for its testable framing by Junio and Mahnken 2013.^[59]

Mearsheimer’s article provides an excellent example of scenario analysis being used to extend an existing theory and develop testable hypotheses that were subsequently falsified. Various reasons may explain why his theory was incorrect—such as normative claims, continued reliance on US security guarantees, and so on—but it is at least clear that his scenario-based approach framed a debate in a rigorous and clearly articulated way and has led to new areas of exploration for the discipline.
— Timothy Junio and Thomas Mahnken, Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations (2013)

Mearsheimer, John J.; Hoffmann, Stanley; Keohane, Robert O. (1990). "Back to the Future, Part II: International Relations Theory and Post-Cold War Europe". International Security. 15 (2): 191–199. doi:10.2307/2538869. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538869.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Risse-Kappen, Thomas; Russett, Bruce M. (1990). "Back to the Future, Part III: Realism and the Realities of European Security". International Security. 15 (3): 216–222. doi:10.2307/2538912. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538912.
— (1990). "After the Cold War: Will We Miss It?". Current History. 327: 30–41. ISSN 0011-3530.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Shapley, Deborah (1993). "McNamara's War" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 49 (6): 49–51. doi:10.1080/00963402.1993.11456373. ISSN 0096-3402.
— (1994). "The False Promise of International Institutions" (PDF). International Security. 19 (3): 5–49. doi:10.2307/2539078. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539078.
— (1995). "A Realist Reply". International Security. 20 (1): 82–93. doi:10.2307/2539218. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539218.
- This article was Mearsheimer's defense of his The False Promise of International Institutions.
— (1998). "The Aims of Education" (PDF). Philosophy and Literature. 22 (1): 137–155. ISSN 0190-0013. cite-14
— (1998). "Mearsheimer's Response: "Teaching Morality at the Margins"" (PDF). Philosophy and Literature. 22 (1): 193–198. ISSN 0190-0013.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2003). "Can Saddam be Contained? History Says Yes" (PDF). Foreign Policy Bulletin. 14 (1): 219–224. doi:10.1017/S1052703600006109. ISSN 1052-7036.
— (June 2006). "Author's Response: Will China and the United States Clash?". Issues & Studies. 39 (2): 259–262. ISSN 1013-2511.
- This article was Mearsheimer's defense of his book, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Rogers, Paul; Little, Richard; Hill, Christopher; Brown, Chris; Booth, Jen (2005). "Roundtable: The Battle Rages On". Interational Relations. 19 (3): 337–360. doi:10.1177/0047117805055411. ISSN 0047-1178.
— (2005). "E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On" (PDF). International Relations. 19 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1177/0047117805052810. eISSN 1741-2862.
— (2006). "China's Unpeaceful Rise" (PDF). Current History. 105 (690): 160–162. doi:10.1525/curh.2006.105.690.160. ISSN 0011-3530.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" (PDF). London Review of Books. 28 (6) (1st ed.): 3–12. ISSN 0260-9592. Revised version published as —; Walt, Stephen M. (2006-09-14). "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy". Middle East Policy. 13 (3) (2nd ed.): 29–87. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4967.2006.00260.x. ISSN 1061-1924. Spanish translation published as —; Walt, Stephen M. (2006). "O Lobby de Israel". Novos Estudos CEBRAP (76): 43–73. doi:10.1590/S0101-33002006000300003. eISSN 1980-5403. cite-400
- The article was presented before the National Press Club the year of its publication.^[60] In response to widespread criticism, the authors published a response as —; Walt, Stephen M. (2006-12-12). "Setting the Record Straight: A Response to Critics of "The Israel Lobby"" (PDF).
— (2008). "Rivalry in the Offing" (PDF). China Security. 4 (2): 9–10. ISSN 1935-5564.
— (2008). "The US Should Act as an Honest Broker" (PDF). Palestine-Israel Journal. 15 (1–2): 147–152. ISSN 0793-1395.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2009-02-12). "Is it love or the lobby? Explaining America's special relationship with Israel". Security Studies. 18 (1): 58–78. doi:10.1080/09636410802678031. eISSN 1556-1852.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2009-05-15). "The Blind Man and the Elephant in the Room: Robert Lieberman and the Israel Lobby". Perspectives on Politics. 7 (2): 259–273. doi:10.1017/S1537592709090781. ISSN 1537-5927.
— (2009-06-24). "Reckless States and Realism" (PDF). International Relations. 23 (2): 241–256. doi:10.1177/0047117809104637. ISSN 0047-1178.
— (2010). "Why is Europe Peaceful Today" (PDF). European Political Science. 9 (3): 387–397. doi:10.1057/eps.2010.24. eISSN 1682-0983.
— (2010-12-08). "Gathering Storm: China's Challenge to US Power in Asia" (PDF). The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 3 (4): 381–396. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016.
— (2011). "Realists as Idealists" (PDF). Security Studies. 20 (3): 424–430. doi:10.1080/09636412.2011.599190. eISSN 1556-1852.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2013-09-05). "Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations" (PDF). European Political Science. 19 (3): 427–457. doi:10.1177/1354066113494320. eISSN 1682-0983.
— (2016-03-01). "A Global Discipline of IR? Benign Hegemony". International Studies Review. 18 (1): 147–149. doi:10.1093/isr/viv021. ISSN 1521-9488. JSTOR 24758344.
— (2016). "Defining a New Security Architecture for Europe that Brings Russia in from the Cold". Military Review. 96 (3): 27–31. ISSN 0026-4148.
— (2017). "The False Promise of International Institutions". International Organization. 19 (3): 5–49. doi:10.2307/2539078. ISSN 1531-5088. JSTOR 2539078.
— (2019-04-01). "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order". International Security. 43 (4): 7–50. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00342. eISSN 1531-4804.
- Also delivered in lecture form at the Centre for Independent Studies, which on account of being widely viewed is sometimes cited instead.^[61]^[62] John Ikenberry debated the article with Mearsheimer in 2021.^[63]
— (2019-07-01). "Realism and Restraint". Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development (14): 12–31. ISSN 2406-0402. JSTOR 48573725.
— (2021). "Liberalism and Nationalism in Contemporary America" (PDF). PS: Political Science & Politics. 54 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1017/S1049096520001808. ISSN 1537-5935.
— (2022-07-01). "The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War" (PDF). Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development (21): 12–27. ISSN 2406-0402.
- Also delivered in lecture form at The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, sometimes cited instead on account of its over 4 million views.^[64] To that lecture, the director of the EUI, political scientist Alexander Stubb who was also the president of Finland at the time, published a critical response.^[65] Two political scientists from the same institute had already published a brief critique, mainly of his theories on the role of NATO.^[66] Another EUI political scientist followed up Stubb's video with his own critique.^[67]
— (2023). "Cracks in the Liberal Edifice" (PDF). Military Review: 115–152. ISSN 0026-4148.

Magazine and newspaper articles[edit]

— (1991-02-08). "Liberation in Less Than a Week". The New York Times. p. A31. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (1991-12-28). "Opinion: Professor's Own Nazi Past Accuses Her; Apology Sought". The New York Times. p. A18. ISSN 0362-4331.
—; Miller, Steven E. (1993). "Should Ukraine Stay Nuclear? A Debate". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 72. pp. 239–261. ISSN 0015-7120.
— (1993-03-31). "Shrink Bosnia to Save It". The New York Times. p. A23. ISSN 0362-4331.
—; Pape, Robert A. (1993-06-14). "The Answer" (PDF). The New Republic. Vol. 203. pp. 22–27. ISSN 0028-6583.
— (1993). "The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. pp. 50–66. ISSN 0015-7120.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Van Evera, Stephen (1995-12-18). "When Peace Means War: The partition that dare not speak its name" (PDF). The New Republic. Vol. 18. pp. 16–21. ISSN 0028-6583.
Mearsheimer, John J.; van Evera, Stephen (1996-09-24). "Opinion: Hateful Neighbors". The New York Times. p. A25. ISSN 0362-4331.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Van Evera, Stephen (1996-09-25). "Partition is the Inevitable Solution for Bosnia". International Herald Tribune. p. 6. ISSN 0294-8052.
— (1997-10-07). "The Only Exit from Bosnia". The New York Times. No. 7. p. A31. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (1997-10-08). "Since Dayton Is Doomed, Get On With the Partition of Bosnia". International Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 0294-8052.
— (1998-10-19). "A Peace Agreement That's Bound to Fail". The New York Times. p. A17. ISSN 0362-4331.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Van Evera, Stephen (1999-04-19). "Redraw the Map, Stop the Killing". The New York Times. No. 19. p. A23. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2000-03-24). "India Needs the Bomb". The New York Times. No. 24. p. A21. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2001-01-11). "The Impossible Partition". The New York Times. No. 11. p. A25. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2001-11-04). "Guns Won't Win the Afghan War". The New York Times. No. 4. p. 13. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2001). "The Future of the American Pacifier". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 80, no. 5. p. 46. doi:10.2307/20050250. ISSN 0015-7120. JSTOR 20050250.
- Criticised by Vojtech Mastny in a letter to Foreign Affairs.^[68]
— (2002). "Hearts and Minds". The National Interest. No. 69. pp. 13–16. ISSN 0884-9382.
— (2002-02-08). "Liberal Talk, Realist Thinking". University of Chicago Magazine. Vol. 94, no. 3. pp. 24–38. ISSN 0041-9508.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2003). "An Unnecessary War" (PDF). Foreign Policy. pp. 50–59. ISSN 0015-7228.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2003-02-02). "Keeping Saddam Hussein in a Box" (PDF). The New York Times. No. 2. p. 54. ISSN 0362-4331. cite-57
— (2005). "Better to be Godzilla than Bambi". Foreign Policy. No. 146. pp. 47–48. ISSN 0015-7228. JSTOR 30048171.
— (2005). "Showing the United States the Door". Foreign Policy. No. 146. p. 49. ISSN 0015-7228. JSTOR 30048173.
— (2005). "It's Not a Pretty Picture". Foreign Policy. No. 146. p. 50. ISSN 0015-7228. JSTOR 30048175.
— (2005-05-18). "Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq war: realism versus neo-conservatism". openDemocracy. eISSN 1476-5888.
— (2005-11-18). "The Rise of China Will not be Peaceful at All" (PDF). The Australian. Vol. 18, no. 11. ISSN 1038-8761.
- Not to be confused with its dlivery in the form of a lecture at the University of Ottawa, widely viewed.^[69]
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2006). "Unrestricted Access: What the Israel Lobby Wants, It Too Often Gets". Foreign Policy. No. 155. pp. 57–58. ISSN 0015-7228. JSTOR 25462064.
— (2008-12-30). "Pull Those Boots off the Ground". Newsweek. p. 334. ISSN 0028-9604.
— (2009). "Saving Israel From Itself". The American Conservative. ISSN 1540-966X.
— (2009). "How Afghanistan went from good war to bad". Newsweek. ISSN 0028-9604.
— (2009-11-02). "Hollow Victory". Foreign Policy. No. 2. ISSN 0015-7228.
— (2010). "Afghanistan: No More the Good War" (PDF). Newsweek. ISSN 0028-9604.
— (2010). "Sinking Ship" (PDF). The American Conservative. pp. 10–12. ISSN 1540-966X.
— (2010-10-29). "Australians should fear the rise of China" (PDF). The Spectator. No. 2. ISSN 0038-6952.
— (2010-11-01). "The Best and the Brightest". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 89, no. 6. p. 201. ISSN 0015-7120.
— (2011). "Imperial by Design" (PDF). The National Interest. No. 111. pp. 16–34. ISSN 0884-9382.
- Delivered as a lecture at the The University of Chicago, sometimes cited instead.^[70] It was also delivered before Carleton University.^[71]
— (2014). "America Unhinged" (PDF). The National Interest. No. 129. pp. 9–30. ISSN 0884-9382.
— (2014). "Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 5. pp. 77–89. ISSN 0015-7120.
- A lecture he delivered on this article was viewed over 29 million times on YouTube.^[72]
— (2014). "The Burden of Irresponsibility". The National Interest. No. 129. ISSN 0884-9382.
— (2014-02-25). "Say Goodbye to Taiwan". The National Interest. ISSN 0884-9382.
— (2014-03-01). "Taiwan's Dire Straits" (PDF). The National Interest. No. 130. pp. 29–39. ISSN 0884-9382.
— (2014-03-13). "Getting Ukraine Wrong". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2014). "How the West Caused the Ukraine Crisis". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 5. ISSN 0015-7120.
— (2014-10-17). "Faulty Powers: Who Started the Ukraine Crisis?". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 167–178. ISSN 0015-7120.
- Criticised by Michael McFaul^[73] and Stephen Sestanovich^[74] in the same edition, including a response from Mearsheimer.^[75] Their criticism was in turn critiqued by Susan Eisenhower.^[76]
— (2014-10-25). "Can China Rise Peacefully?". The National Interest. Vol. 25, no. 1. pp. 1–40. ISSN 0884-9382.
- Delivered in lecture format before the Jefferson Literary and Debating Society,^[77] the University of Chicago^[78] and Reed College.^[79]
— (2015-02-09). "Don't Arm Ukraine". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2016-06-13). "The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior US Grand Stategy". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 95. ISSN 0015-7120.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2019-04-01). "The Influence of Aipac". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2019-07-01). "Iran Is Rushing to Build a Nuclear Weapon — and Trump Can't Stop It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
— (2020-12-29). "Joe Biden Must Embrace Liberal Nationalism to Lead America Forward". Russia Matters. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Originally published in The National Interest.
— (2021-10-19). "The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 100. ISSN 0015-7120.
- Criticised by John Ikenberry,^[80] Andrew J. Nathan,^[81] Susan Thornton^[82] and Sun Zhe,^[83] with a response by Mearsheimer.^[84]
Brzezinski, Zbigniew; Mearsheimer, John J. (2009-10-22). "Clash of the Titans". Foreign Policy. No. 146. pp. 46–47.
— (2022-03-19). "John Mearsheimer on why the West is principally responsible for the Ukrainian crisis". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613.
— (2022-06-23). "The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine Crisis". The National Interest. ISSN 0884-9382. Originally presented as — (2015-06-04). The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine Crisis. UChicago Alumni Weekend 2015.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-08-17). "Playing With Fire in Ukraine: The Underappreciated Risks of Catastrophic Escalation". Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
—; Rosato, Sebastian (2023-12-12). "Essence of Decision Making". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 103. ISSN 0015-7120.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Rosato, Sebastian (2024-01-01). "Essence of Decision Making". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 103, no. 1. pp. 173–177. ISSN 0015-7120.

Books[edit]

Conventional Deterrence. Cornell University Press. 1983. ISBN 0801415691. cite-1393
- An influential book within the United States Army. Positively reviewed by George E. Orr,^[85] but less positively by David Calleo. Reviewed by Jed Snyder in 1985.^[86] It became a combat textbook.^[87] As a standard reference, it has been extensively employed in works by Corbin Williamson,^[88] Philip J. Romero,^[89] and others.
Liddell Hart and the Weight of History. Cornell University Press. 1988. ISBN 080142089X. OCLC 17953067.
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company. 2001. ISBN 0393020258. OCLC 46678382.
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2007. ISBN 978-0374177720. OCLC 144227359.
- The book received mixed reviews, prompting the authors to respond with an article in Prospect.^[90] After its initial presentation,^[91] it was presented as a lecture before the Council for the National Interest,^[92] Code Pink,^[93] the GBH Forum Network,^[94] the Center for International and Regional Studies,^[95] and most prominently at the University of Chicago, sometimes cited instead of the book^[96] Bruce Feiler debated Mearsheimer on the book in 2018.^[97]
Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics. Oxford University Press. 2011. ISBN 9780199758739. OCLC 593639329.
- It grew out of the material from of a 2010 lecture at the Centre for International Governance Innovation.^[98] The book itself was presented as a lecture viewed over 6 million times on YouTube.^[99]
The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press. 2018. ISBN 978-0300234190.
- Reviewed by C. William Walldorf, to which Mearsheimer responded with an article in Perspectives on Politics.^[100] Also reviewed Reviewed by Glenn Diesen.^[101] Several lectures delivered on the subject of the book were widely viewed, including that before The Bush School of Government and Public Service^[102] and that before Carleton University.^[103] The book was also delivered i lecture form at the SOAS University of London^[104] and the University of Bonn,^[105] and presented and discussed at the SETA Foundation.^[106]
Mearsheimer, John J.; Rosato, Sebastian (2023). How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300269307.
- Ashley J. Tellis debated Mearsheimer on the book in 2023.^[107]

Contributions[edit]

Mearsheimer, John J. (1979). "Realism, the real world, and the academy". In Brecher, Michael; Harvey, Frank (eds.). Millennial Reflections on International Studies. University of Michigan Press. pp. 57–64. doi:10.3998/mpub.17045. ISBN 0472112732. JSTOR 10.3998/mpub.17045.
Mearsheimer, John J.; Hardin, Russell (1985). "Introduction". Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy. 95 (3): 411–423. doi:10.1086/292651. ISSN 0014-1704. Republished in — (1985). Nuclear Deterrence, Ethics and Strategy. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226317021.
— (1992). "Disorder Restored". Rethinking America's Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. Norton. pp. 213–137. ISBN 0393962180.
— (1994-04-07). "Instability in Europe After the Cold War". War. Oxford Readers. ISBN 9780192892546.
— (1998-10-12). "The Future of America's Continental Commitment". No End to Alliance (The United States and Western Europe: Past, Present and Future). pp. 221–242. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26959-4_11. ISBN 978-0-333-74080-4.
— (2000). "The Case for Partitioning Kosovo". NATO's Empty Victory: A Postmortem on the Balkan War. Cato Institute. pp. 133–138. ISBN 188257785X.
— (2002). "Realism, the Real World, and the Academy". Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 23–33. ISBN 1-282-44458-1.
— (2004). "Hitler and the Blitzkrieg Strategy". The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 130–144. ISBN 0742525570.
— (2005). "Strategies for Survival". Perspectives on World Politics (3rd ed.). Taylor and Francis. pp. 69–79. ISBN 9780415322768.
— (2011-02-18). "The War on Terrorism". Security Studies. Routledge. pp. 422–426. ISBN 9780415326018.
— (2013). "Structural Realism". International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (PDF). Oxford University Press. pp. 77–93. ISBN 9780198707561.
- Because it was widely viewed, some sources cite the lecture instead: Mearsheimer, John J. (2014-10-03). Structural Realism. International Relations. Open University – via YouTube. 9:21.</ref>
— (2014-08-12). "Anarchy and the Struggle for Power". The Realism Reader (PDF). Routledge. pp. 179–187. ISBN 9780415773577.
— (2015-07-29). "Preface". Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security (1st ed.). pp. x–xi. ISBN 9781315867908.
— (2015-09-16). "Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War". Conflict after the Cold War (PDF). Routledge. pp. 28–44. ISBN 9781032010083.
— (2015-12-31). "Israel and Academic Freedom". Who's Afraid of Academic Freedom?. Columbia University Press. pp. 316–333. ISBN 9780231168816.

Book reviews[edit]

— (June 1990). "John Lehman's Command". Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly. 20 (2): 13–16. doi:10.55540/0031-1723.1564. ISBN 068418995X. ISSN 0031-1723.
- Review of Lehman, John Francis Jr. (1988). Command of the Seas. Scribner. ISBN 068418995X.
— (1998). "Review: Political Realism in International Theory". The International History Review. 20 (3): 776–778. ISSN 0707-5332. JSTOR 40101400.
- Review of Spegele, Roger D. (1996). Political Realism in International Theory. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511586392.
— (2001-09-01). "Kissinger's Wisdom and Advice". The National Interest. pp. 123–128. ISSN 0884-9382.
- Review of Kissinger, Henry Alfred (2001). Does America Need A Foreign Policy?: Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0684855674.
— (2013). "Has Violence Declined in World Politics?" (PDF). Perspectives on Politics. 11 (2): 570–573. doi:10.1017/S1537592713000170. ISSN 1537-5927.
- Review of Goldstein, Joshua S. (2011). Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. Penguin Publishing. ISBN 9780525952534.

Lectures[edit]

— (2011-05-05). Kissing Cousins: Nationalism and Realism (PDF). Yale Workshop on International Relations. pp. 1–44.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-11-24). The Relevance of Realism in the 21st Century: Keynote Speech. IntRpol – via YouTube. Part 1 33:93. Part 2 32:43.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2012-08-08) [recorded 2010-04-29]. The Future of Palestine: Righteous Jews vs the New Afrikaners. The Jerusalem Fund – via YouTube. 1:03:04.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-01-20) [recorded 2012-12-11]. The Honorary Patronage of John Mearsheimer: The Future of the Trans-Atlantic Alliance. University Philosophical Society – via YouTube. 49:11.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-04-11). The Future of American Landpower. United States Army War College. 1:20:38.
— (2013-05-08). The Rise of China and the Decline of the US Army. U.S. Army War College XXIV Annual Strategy Conference.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2014-06-10). The Rise of Asia?. Chicago Access Network Television – via YouTube. 1:57:10.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2016-08-27). Vietnam and America: John Mearsheimer Explains Vietnam and America. Max Mearsheimer – via YouTube. 1:11:29.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2016-11-01). Offensive Realism in explaining the current and future US-China relations. Moscow State Institute of International Relations – via YouTube. 1:50:19.

- Mearsheimer, John J. (2017-03-28) [recorded 2017-03-24]. Changes in the Israel Lobby. Washington Report on Middle East Affairs – via YouTube. 42:54.

Mearsheimer, John J. (2017-06-30). On the World Order. Dialogue of Civilizations – via YouTube.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2017-11-22). The Roots of Liberal Hegemony. =Henry L. Stimson Lectures on World Affairs. Yale University – via YouTube.{{cite AV media}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) 53:33. 535K
Mearsheimer, John J. (2017-11-22). The False Promise of Liberal Hegemony. Henry L. Stimson Lectures on World Affairs. Yale University – via YouTube. 1:23:42.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-04-17) [recorded 2018-04-13]. American International Relations Theory: Its Influence at Home and Abroad. The Danish Foreign Policy Society – via YouTube. 1:47:12.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-11-05) [recorded 2018-10-31]. The Future of NATO in the Age of Trump. Romania Energy Center – via YouTube. 1:59:00.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-03-21). Theory and Practice of Security Conference: Keynote. Georgetown University Center for Security Studies – via YouTube. 1:16:56.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-08-07). The liberal international order. Centre for Independent Studies – via YouTube. 54:15.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-12-05). Great Power Politics in the 21st Century & The Implications for Hungary. Századvég Alapítvány – via YouTube. 1:47:21.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2023-05-24) [presented 2023-05-22]. Where is the Ukraine War Going?. Committee for the Republic – via YouTube. 1:33:46.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2023-10-30). Israel-Hamas, Ukraine-Russia and China: John Mearsheimer on why the US is in serious trouble!. Centre for Independent Studies – via YouTube. Rereleased as — (2024-05-17). Why Israel is in deep trouble. Centre for Independent Studies – via YouTube. 46:77.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2024-02-13). War and International Politics: John Mearsheimer. 2023-24 NDISC Seminar Series. NDISC – via YouTube. 1:30:40.

Notes[edit]

^ Tecott and Halterman defended Mearsheimer's omission. "He omits airpower variables from his model not because he thinks these variables are irrelevant to the outcome, but because he argues that airpower would favor NATO, only strengthening his argument."^[42]
^ A possibility publicised by senators Sam Nunn and Dewey F. Bartlett in a 1977 report.^[43]
^ Optimistic from a NATO perspective, regarding its ability to defend in the European theatre. Not to be confused with the "Peace movement".^[53]^: 147

References[edit]

^ Gruber, Anton; Tekles, Alexander; Bornmann, Lutz (2023-05-18). "John Mearsheimer's academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist's oeuvre". Scientometrics. 128 (1): 3867–3877. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04721-6. eISSN 1588-2861. On the one hand, the publication years in which Mearsheimer derived his fundamental theory of International Relations can be inferred. On the other hand, later years show his subsequent thematic focuses and his preoccupation with current events and conflicts.
^ Gouré, Daniel; McCormick, Gordon (1980). "Debate on precision-guided munitions: PGM: No Panacea)". Survival. 22 (1): 15–19. doi:10.1080/00396338008441859. ISSN 0039-6338.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (1980). "Debate on precision-guided munitions: Rejoinder". Survival. 22 (1): 20–22. doi:10.1080/00396338008441860. ISSN 0039-6338.
^ Mandel, Robert (2004). "The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry". Armed Forces and Society. 30 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1177/0095327X0403000203. ISSN 0095-327X. JSTOR 48608627.
^ Blagden, David (2020-10-12). "Strategic stability and the proliferation of conventional precision strike: a (bounded) case for optimism?". The Nonproliferation Review. 27 (1–3): 123–136. doi:10.1080/10736700.2020.1799569. ISSN 1073-6700.
^ Kahn, Lauren; Horowitz, Michael C. (2022-07-11). "Who Gets Smart? Explaining How Precision Bombs Proliferate". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 67 (1): 3–37. doi:10.1177/00220027221111143. eISSN 1552-8766.
^ Posen, Barry R. (1985). "Measuring the European Conventional Balance: Coping with Complexity in Threat Assessment". International Security. 9 (3). ISSN 0162-2889.
^ Calleo, David Patrick (1983). "Domestic Priorities and the demands of alliance: An American perspective". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (184): 2–11. doi:10.1080/05679328308457436. ISSN 0567-932X.
^ Facer, Roger L. L. (1985). Conventional Forces and the NATO Strategy of Flexible Response. ISBN 0-8330-0623-1.
^ ^a ^b Epstein, Joshua Morris (1988). "Dynamic Analysis and the Conventional Balance in Europe". International Security. 12 (4): 154–165. doi:10.2307/2538999. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538999.^: 157
^ Lauer, G. S. "Maneuver Warfare Theory and The Operational Level of War: Misguiding The Marine Corps?". Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College.
^ McKeown, Alex Raymond (1990). An Analysis of the Conventional Military Balance on the European Central Front: Some Implications for NATO Strategy and Tactics (Thesis). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
^
- Rutland, L. W. (2012). Culminate and Counter: The Operational Art in the Defensive (PDF) (Thesis). Canadian Forces College.
- Campbell, Peter P. (2014). "Hypothetical 4 – Military Realism and Operations 1976 to 1986". The essence of war and military doctrine: Military Realism and US Army warfighting doctrine from 1960 to 2008 (Thesis). University of Notre Dame. pp. 186–188.
- Kofroň, Jan; Kruntorádová, Ilona (2016). "Reflexe českého metodologického vzdělávání: Odpověď Jakubu Záhorovi". Mezinárodní vztahy. 51 (3): 84–92. eISSN 2570-9429.
- Pedroso Mendes, Flávio (2019). "A construção do compromisso: a presença militar dos EUA na Europa durante a Guerra Fria" [The Making of Commitment: US Military Presence in Europe During the Cold War]. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval. 25 (1): 587–612. doi:10.21544/1809-3191.v25n3.p587-612. eISSN 2359-3075.
^ Matthews, John C. III (1996). "Current Gains and Future Outcomes: When Cumulative Relative Gains Matter". International Security. 21 (1): 112–146. doi:10.2307/2539110. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539110. It was thought by som analysts that NATO forces were at a good force-to-space ratio, and that cuts might jeopardize the ability of the NATO divisions to hold.
^ Huntington, Samuel Phillips (1984). "Conventional Deterrence and Conventional Retaliation in Europe". International Security. 8 (3s): 32–56. doi:10.2307/2538699. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538699.
^ Huntington, Samuel Phillips (1983). "Broadening the strategic focus: Comments on Michael Howard's paper". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (184): 27–32. doi:10.1080/05679328308457439. ISSN 0567-932X.
^
- Holst, Johan Jørgen (1983). "Domestic concerns and nuclear doctrine: How should the nuclear posture be shaped?". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (183): 28–42. doi:10.1080/05679328308457434. ISSN 0567-932X. Page 38.
- Desch, Michael C. (1989). "The Keys that Lock Up the World: Identifying American Interests in the Periphery". International Security. 14 (1): 86–121. doi:10.2307/2538766. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538766. Page 88.
- Zakaria, Fareed (1990). "The Reagan Strategy of Containment". Political Science Quarterly. 105 (3): 373–395. doi:10.2307/2150823. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2150823. Page 384.
^
- Frei, Daniel (1984). Alternatives to the First Use of Nuclear Weapons. ISBN 9781003053828.
- Garnham, David (1985). "Extending Deterrence with German Nuclear Weapons". International Security. 10 (1): 96–110. doi:10.2307/2538791. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538791. Page 99.
- Kolodziej, Edward A. (1988). "SDI, Alliance Coherence, and East—West Nuclear Stability". Rethinking the Nuclear Weapons Dilemma in Europe. Houndmills: The Macmillan Press. pp. 29–58. ISBN 978-1-349-09181-2.
^ Posen, Barry R.; Van Evera, Stephen (1983). "Defense Policy and the Reagan Administration: Departure from Containment". International Security. 8 (1): 3–45. doi:10.2307/2538484. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538484. An excellent essay on the NATO conventional balance
^ Brauch, Hans Günter; Unterseher, Lutz (June 1984). "Review Essay: Getting Rid of Nuclear Weapons: A Review of a Few Proposals for a Conventional Defense of Europe". Journal of Peace Research. 21 (2): 193–199. doi:10.1177/002234338402100209. ISSN 0022-3433. The ESEC study is in line with the 'bean counting' philosophy, a force balance that only marginally takes into account qualitative aspects — contrasting what Mearsheimer has done recently in a convincing manner.
^ Lübkemeier, Eckhard (1985). "Extended Deterrence: Implications for Arms Limitation and Reduction". Bulletin of Peace Proposals. 16 (3): 249–254. doi:10.1177/096701068501600306. ISSN 0007-5035.
^ Dean, Jonathan (1986). "Assessing the Warsaw Pact Threat to NATO's Central Front". The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs. 21 (3): 26–34. doi:10.1080/03932728608456594. ISSN 0393-2729.
^ Weinstein, John M. (1983-07-15). "All Features Grate and Stall: Soviet Strategic Vulnerabilities and the Future of Deterrence" (PDF).
^ Strachan, Hew (1985). "Conventional Defence in Europe". International Affairs. 61 (1): 27–43. doi:10.2307/2619778. ISSN 1473-799X. JSTOR 2619778.
^ Simpson, John (1985). "New conventional weapon technologies and conventional disarmament". Arms Control. 6 (1): 82–96. doi:10.1080/01440388508403813. ISSN 0099-4561.
^ Snyder, Jack Lewis (1985). "Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy". International Security. 9 (3): 89–108. doi:10.2307/2538588. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538588.
^ Kaufmann, William Weed (1983). "Nonnuclear Deterrence". Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question. Brookings Institution. pp. 88–89. ISBN 0815781180.
^ Mako, William P. (1983). U.S. Ground Forces and the Defense of Central Europe. Brookings Institution. ISBN 0815754442.
^ Hamilton, Andrew (1983). "Redressing the Conventional Balance: NATO's Reserve Military Manpower". International Security. 10 (1): 111–136. doi:10.2307/2538792. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538792.
^ Corcoran, Edward A. (1983-06-01). Improving Europe's Conventional Defenss. Strategic Issues Research Memorandum.
^ Snyder, Jack Lewis (1988). "Limiting Offensive Conventional Forces: Soviet Proposals and Western Options". International Security. 12 (4): 48–77. doi:10.2307/2538994. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538994.
^ Cohen, Eliot Asher (1988). "Toward Better Net Assessment: Rethinking the European Conventional Balance". International Security. 13 (1): 50–89. doi:10.2307/2538896. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538896.
^ Friedberg, Aaron Louis (1988). "Review: The Assessment of Military Power: A Review Essay". International Security. 12 (3): 190–202. doi:10.2307/2538805. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538805.
^ Sens, Allen Gregory (1988-08-17). NATO and the INF Controversy: Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, an the Atlantic Alliance (Thesis). Vancouver: University of British Columbi.
^ Makinda, Samuel M. (1988). "Moscow and the INF treaty". Australian Outlook. 42 (3): 133–144. doi:10.1080/10357718808444974. ISSN 1035-7718.
^ Thomson, James A. (1989). "An Unfavorable Situation: NATO and the Conventional Balance" (PDF). The Adelphi Papers. 29 (236): 72–102. doi:10.1080/05679328908448874. ISSN 0567-932X.
^ Borinski, Phillipp (1989). "Mitigating West Germany's Strategic Dilemmas". Armed Forces & Society. 15 (4): 531–549. doi:10.1177/0095327X8901500404. ISSN 0095-327X.
^ Jones, Peter (1985). "New Conventional Technologies and Their Possible Impact on Conventional Arms Control Verification in Europe". Arms Control. 10 (2): 152–167. doi:10.1080/01440388908403907. ISSN 0099-4561.
^ Van Evera, Stephen (2009). "Foreword". American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat inflation since 9/11. pp. xi–xvi. ISBN 9780203879092.
^ Thomson, James A. (2018). "Deterrence Then and Now". SIRIUS - Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen. 2 (2): 1–8. doi:10.1515/sirius-2018-0024. eISSN 2510-2648.
^ Watts, Barry D. (2007-12-24). "Ignoring reality: Problems of theory and evidence in security studies". Security Studies. 7 (2): 115–171. doi:10.1080/09636419708429344. ISSN 0963-6412.
^ ^a ^b Tecott, Rachel; Halterman, Andrew (2020-09-30). "The Case for Campaign Analysis: A Method for Studying Military Operations" (PDF). International Security. 45 (4). ISSN 0162-2889.
^ Nunn, Sam; Bartlett, Dewey Follett Sr. (1977). NATO and the New Soviet Threat: Report of Senator Sam Nunn and Senator Dewey F. Bartlett to the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
^ White, Kenton (October 2016). "Credibility Analysis – Mearsheimer's viewpoint". British Defence Planning and Britain's NATO commitment, 1979 – 1985 (PDF) (Thesis). pp. 283–288.
^ White, Kenton (2017). "Mearsheimer's Folly: NATO's Cold War Capability and Credibility". Infinity Journal. 5 (4). eISSN 2312-5888.
^ Heydarian Pashakhanlou, Arash (2016-10-23). "Fear in the Works of Morgenthau, Waltz and Mearsheimer". Realism and Fear in International Relations: Morgenthau, Waltz and Mearsheimer Reconsidered. pp. 23–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41012-8_2. ISBN 978-3-319-41012-8.
^ Stoll, Richard J. (1990). "The Russians Are Coming: A Computer Simulation". Armed Forces & Society. 16 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1177/0095327X9001600202. hdl:1911/75021. ISSN 0095-327X.
^ Hardin, Bristow (June 1991). The militarized social democracy and racism: The relationships between militarism, racism and social welfare policy in the United States (Thesis). Santa Cruz: University of California.
^ Leah, Christine M. (2015). "Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age". Comparative Strategy. 34 (5): 401–421. doi:10.1080/01495933.2015.1089122. ISSN 0149-5933.
^ Motin, Dylan (2018-04-20). "The Making of a Blitzkrieg: Russia's Decision to Go to War with Afghanistan, Georgia, but not Ukraine" (PDF). The Institute for Basic Social Science. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-04-12.
^ Rippy, Julian T. (2022-08-17). A Mixed-Methods Approach to Force Estimation in Military Operations Other Than War (Thesis). Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
^ Motin, Dylan (June 2024). "The Logic of U.S. Deployment in Norway: The Trump Administration and NATO's Northern Front". Journal of Global Strategic Studies. 4 (1): 50–71. eISSN 2798-4427.
^ Dankbaar, Ben (1984). "Alternative Defense Policies and the Peace Movement". Journal of Peace Research. 21 (2): 141–155. doi:10.1177/002234338402100205. ISSN 0022-3433.
^
- Betts, Richard Kevin (1983). "Conventional Strategy: New Critics, Old Choices". International Security. 7 (4): 140–162. doi:10.2307/2626735. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2626735.
- Lebow, Richard Ned (1985). "The Soviet Offensive in Europe: The Schlieffen Plan Revisited?". International Security. 9 (4): 44–78. doi:10.2307/2538541. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538541. Page 45.
- Snyder, Jack; Sagan, Scott D. (1987). "The Origins of Offense and the Consequences of Counterforce". International Security. 11 (3): 187–198. doi:10.2307/2538891. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538891. Pages 191-192.
- Cohen, Eliot Asher (1988). "Toward Better Net Assessment: Rethinking the European Conventional Balance". International Security. 13 (1): 50–89. doi:10.2307/2538896. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538896. Page 51.
- Blackwill, Robert Dean (1988). "Conceptual Problems of Conventional Arms Control". International Security. 12 (4): 28–47. doi:10.2307/2538993. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538993.
- Sutey, William K. (1993-05-14). The Active Defense and AirLand Battle in Soviet Military Thought (PDF). Page 46.
- Tecott, Rachel; Halterman, Andrew (2020-09-30). "The Case for Campaign Analysis: A Method for Studying Military Operations" (PDF). International Security. 45 (4): 7. ISSN 0162-2889.
- Sarantakes, Nicholas Evan (2023). "The Future-War Literature of the Reagan Era—Winning World War III in Fiction". Naval War College Review. 76 (3). ISSN 0028-1484.
^ Christian, Joshua T. (2019). "An Examination of Force Ratios" (PDF). Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies, US Army Command and General Staff College.
^ Rohn, Laurinda L. (May 1990). Conventional Forces in Europe: A New Approach to the Balance, Stability, and Arms Control (PDF). ISBN 0-8330-0687-8.
^ Epstein, Joshua M. (1989). "The 3:1 Rule, the Adaptive Dynamic Model, and the Future of Security Studies". International Security. 13 (4): 90–127. doi:10.2307/2538781. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538781.
^ Kress, Moshe; Talmor, Irit (1999-07-14). "A new look at the 3:1 rule of combat through Markov Stochastic Lanchester models". Journal of the Operational Research Society. 50 (7): 733–744. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600758. ISSN 0160-5682.
^ Junio, Timothy J.; Mahnken, Thomas G. (2013-09-17). "Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations". International Studies Review. 15 (3): 374–395. doi:10.1111/misr.12061. ISSN 1521-9488.
^ — (2006-10-30) [recorded 2006-08-28]. Prof. John Mearsheimer on the Israel Lobby. National Press Club, Bill Hughes – via YouTube.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-08-07). The liberal international order. Centre for Independent Studies – via YouTube. 54:15.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-06-23). "The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War". Russia Matters.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Ikenberry, Gilford John (2021-02-02). The Future of the Liberal International Order. The Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership – via YouTube.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-06-16). The causes and consequences of the Ukraine war. he Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies – via YouTube. 2:07:15.
^ Stubb, Cai-Göran Alexander (2022-06-08). Why Mearsheimer is wrong about Russia and the war in Ukraine: Five arguments from Alexander Stubb. Understanding the War – via Youtube.
^ Anghel, Veronica; Stolle, Dietlind (2022-06-28). "In praise of reality, not realism: An answer to Mearsheimer". EUIdeas.
^ Kostelka, Filip (2022-07-11). "John Mearsheimer's lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences". EUIdeas.
^ Mastny, Vojtech (2001-11-01). "A Different World". Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-11-22) [recorded 2012-10-17]. Why China Cannot Rise Peacefully. University of Ottawa – via YouTube. 1:30:45.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-08-02). Imperial by Design. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 45:39.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-03-07) [recorded 2012-10-18]. America's Imperial Impulse. Political Science Speaker Series. Carleton University – via YouTube. 51:03.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2015-09-25). Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:14:15.
^ McFaul, Michael Anthony (2014-10-17). "Moscow's Choice" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 167–171. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Sestanovich, Stephen (2014-10-17). "How the West Has Won" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 171–175. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2014-10-17). "Mearsheimer Replies" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 175–178. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Eisenhower, Susan Elaine (2015-09-01). "Perils of cornering Russia". United States Studies Centre.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-11-04). Can China Rise Peacefully?. Jefferson Literary and Debating Society – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 1:20:34.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-12-18). Can China Rise Peacefully?. Harper Lectures. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:21:47.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2024-05-02) [delivered 2024-04-16]. Can China Rise Peacefully?. Public Policy Lecture Series. Reed College – via YouTube. 1:24:41.
^ Ikenberry, John (2022-02-11). "The Real Liberal Bet" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Nathan, Andrew James (2022-02-11). "The China Threat in Perspective" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Ashton Thornton, Susan (2022-02-11). "The Barriers to War" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Zhe, Sun (2022-02-11). "In Search of a Strategy" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-02-11). "Mearsheimer Replies" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.
^ Orr, George E. (July 1983). "Effective Command of Combat Operations". Combat Operations C³I: Fundamentals and Interactions. Airpower Research Institute, Air University Press, 4th printing. pp. 90–113. ISBN 1585661023.
^ Snyder, Jed C. (1985). "Review: Conventional Deterrence". Naval War College Review. 38 (3): 111–112. ISSN 0028-1484.
^ Mäki-Ullakko, Ilkka (2023). Contribution of Military Logistics to Conventional Deterrence in the Case of Ukraine (Thesis). hdl:1969.1/6465.
^ Williamson, Corbin (April 2008). Factors Affecting the Feasibility of a Warsaw Pact Invasion of Western Europe (Thesis). Texas A&M University.
^ Romero, Philip J. (1991). A New Approach for the Design and Evaluation of Land Defense Concepts (PDF). ISBN 0-8330-0936-2.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2008-05-23). "Our lobby, his lobby: The Israel Lobby authors reply to Gershom Gorenberg's criticisms in the last issue of Prospect". Prospect. eISSN 2059-6731.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2007-12-20). Iraq, the Neocons and the Israel Lobby. FORA.tv – via YouTube. 6:24.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2008-05-29). On AIPAC and Congress. Council for the National Interest, Bill Hughes – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 16:57.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-05-27). Professor John Mearsheimer Speaks at Move Over AIPAC. Code Pink – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 25:28.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen (2012-08-13) [recorded 2007-10-29]. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt - The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. GBH Forum Network – via YouTube. 1:21:32.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen (2012-12-02) [recorded 2008-06-17]. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Center for International and Regional Studies – via YouTube. 38:05.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2015-08-28). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:21:11.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Feiler, Bruce (2018-04-05). Debating the Israel Lobby. Nonzero. Bloggingheads.tv. 1:10:22.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2010-09-23). Lying in International Politics. Centre for International Governance Innovation – via YouTube. 1:35:33.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2012-03-01). Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics with John Mearsheimer. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:25:46.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2020). "Response to C. William Walldorf Jr.'s Review". Perspectives on Politics. 18 (3): 894–895. doi:10.1017/S1537592720001796. ISSN 1537-5927.
^ Diesen, Glenn; Babich, Dmitry; Babich, Mark (2018-10-24). Bullhorn: Realists. CrossTalk. RT.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-10-10). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. The Bush School of Government and Public Service – via YouTube. 1:16:49.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2020-02-13). The Great Delusion. FPA Research Series. Carleton University – via YouTube.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-01-24) [recorded 2019-01-21]. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. SOAS University of London – via YouTube.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-11-12) [recorded 2018-11-07]. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Center for International Security and Governance – via YouTube.
^ Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-02-26). "Book Discussion with John Mearsheimer" (Interview). Interviewed by Duran, Burhanettin – via YouTube. 1:18:09.
^ Mearsheimer, John J.; Tellis, Ashley J. (2023-10-03). How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy. The Cato Institute – via YouTube. 1:31:54.

[43] Tecott and Halterman defended Mearsheimer's omission. "He omits airpower variables from his model not because he thinks these variables are irrelevant to the outcome, but because he argues that airpower would favor NATO, only strengthening his argument."^[42]

[45] A possibility publicised by senators Sam Nunn and Dewey F. Bartlett in a 1977 report.^[43]

[56] Optimistic from a NATO perspective, regarding its ability to defend in the European theatre. Not to be confused with the "Peace movement".^[53]^: 147

[1] Gruber, Anton; Tekles, Alexander; Bornmann, Lutz (2023-05-18). "John Mearsheimer's academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist's oeuvre". Scientometrics. 128 (1): 3867–3877. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04721-6. eISSN 1588-2861. On the one hand, the publication years in which Mearsheimer derived his fundamental theory of International Relations can be inferred. On the other hand, later years show his subsequent thematic focuses and his preoccupation with current events and conflicts.

[2] Gouré, Daniel; McCormick, Gordon (1980). "Debate on precision-guided munitions: PGM: No Panacea)". Survival. 22 (1): 15–19. doi:10.1080/00396338008441859. ISSN 0039-6338.

[3] Mearsheimer, John J. (1980). "Debate on precision-guided munitions: Rejoinder". Survival. 22 (1): 20–22. doi:10.1080/00396338008441860. ISSN 0039-6338.

[4] Mandel, Robert (2004). "The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry". Armed Forces and Society. 30 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1177/0095327X0403000203. ISSN 0095-327X. JSTOR 48608627.

[5] Blagden, David (2020-10-12). "Strategic stability and the proliferation of conventional precision strike: a (bounded) case for optimism?". The Nonproliferation Review. 27 (1–3): 123–136. doi:10.1080/10736700.2020.1799569. ISSN 1073-6700.

[6] Kahn, Lauren; Horowitz, Michael C. (2022-07-11). "Who Gets Smart? Explaining How Precision Bombs Proliferate". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 67 (1): 3–37. doi:10.1177/00220027221111143. eISSN 1552-8766.

[7] Posen, Barry R. (1985). "Measuring the European Conventional Balance: Coping with Complexity in Threat Assessment". International Security. 9 (3). ISSN 0162-2889.

[8] Calleo, David Patrick (1983). "Domestic Priorities and the demands of alliance: An American perspective". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (184): 2–11. doi:10.1080/05679328308457436. ISSN 0567-932X.

[9] Facer, Roger L. L. (1985). Conventional Forces and the NATO Strategy of Flexible Response. ISBN 0-8330-0623-1.

[Eps1988-10] Epstein, Joshua Morris (1988). "Dynamic Analysis and the Conventional Balance in Europe". International Security. 12 (4): 154–165. doi:10.2307/2538999. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538999.^: 157

[11] Lauer, G. S. "Maneuver Warfare Theory and The Operational Level of War: Misguiding The Marine Corps?". Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College.

[12] McKeown, Alex Raymond (1990). An Analysis of the Conventional Military Balance on the European Central Front: Some Implications for NATO Strategy and Tactics (Thesis). Madison: University of Wisconsin.

[13] 
Rutland, L. W. (2012). Culminate and Counter: The Operational Art in the Defensive (PDF) (Thesis). Canadian Forces College.
Campbell, Peter P. (2014). "Hypothetical 4 – Military Realism and Operations 1976 to 1986". The essence of war and military doctrine: Military Realism and US Army warfighting doctrine from 1960 to 2008 (Thesis). University of Notre Dame. pp. 186–188.
Kofroň, Jan; Kruntorádová, Ilona (2016). "Reflexe českého metodologického vzdělávání: Odpověď Jakubu Záhorovi". Mezinárodní vztahy. 51 (3): 84–92. eISSN 2570-9429.
Pedroso Mendes, Flávio (2019). "A construção do compromisso: a presença militar dos EUA na Europa durante a Guerra Fria" [The Making of Commitment: US Military Presence in Europe During the Cold War]. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval. 25 (1): 587–612. doi:10.21544/1809-3191.v25n3.p587-612. eISSN 2359-3075.

[17] Rutland, L. W. (2012). Culminate and Counter: The Operational Art in the Defensive (PDF) (Thesis). Canadian Forces College.

[18] Campbell, Peter P. (2014). "Hypothetical 4 – Military Realism and Operations 1976 to 1986". The essence of war and military doctrine: Military Realism and US Army warfighting doctrine from 1960 to 2008 (Thesis). University of Notre Dame. pp. 186–188.

[19] Kofroň, Jan; Kruntorádová, Ilona (2016). "Reflexe českého metodologického vzdělávání: Odpověď Jakubu Záhorovi". Mezinárodní vztahy. 51 (3): 84–92. eISSN 2570-9429.

[20] Pedroso Mendes, Flávio (2019). "A construção do compromisso: a presença militar dos EUA na Europa durante a Guerra Fria" [The Making of Commitment: US Military Presence in Europe During the Cold War]. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval. 25 (1): 587–612. doi:10.21544/1809-3191.v25n3.p587-612. eISSN 2359-3075.

[14] Matthews, John C. III (1996). "Current Gains and Future Outcomes: When Cumulative Relative Gains Matter". International Security. 21 (1): 112–146. doi:10.2307/2539110. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2539110. It was thought by som analysts that NATO forces were at a good force-to-space ratio, and that cuts might jeopardize the ability of the NATO divisions to hold.

[15] Huntington, Samuel Phillips (1984). "Conventional Deterrence and Conventional Retaliation in Europe". International Security. 8 (3s): 32–56. doi:10.2307/2538699. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538699.

[16] Huntington, Samuel Phillips (1983). "Broadening the strategic focus: Comments on Michael Howard's paper". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (184): 27–32. doi:10.1080/05679328308457439. ISSN 0567-932X.

[17] 
Holst, Johan Jørgen (1983). "Domestic concerns and nuclear doctrine: How should the nuclear posture be shaped?". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (183): 28–42. doi:10.1080/05679328308457434. ISSN 0567-932X. Page 38.
Desch, Michael C. (1989). "The Keys that Lock Up the World: Identifying American Interests in the Periphery". International Security. 14 (1): 86–121. doi:10.2307/2538766. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538766. Page 88.
Zakaria, Fareed (1990). "The Reagan Strategy of Containment". Political Science Quarterly. 105 (3): 373–395. doi:10.2307/2150823. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2150823. Page 384.

[25] Holst, Johan Jørgen (1983). "Domestic concerns and nuclear doctrine: How should the nuclear posture be shaped?". The Adelphi Papers. 23 (183): 28–42. doi:10.1080/05679328308457434. ISSN 0567-932X. Page 38.

[26] Desch, Michael C. (1989). "The Keys that Lock Up the World: Identifying American Interests in the Periphery". International Security. 14 (1): 86–121. doi:10.2307/2538766. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538766. Page 88.

[27] Zakaria, Fareed (1990). "The Reagan Strategy of Containment". Political Science Quarterly. 105 (3): 373–395. doi:10.2307/2150823. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2150823. Page 384.

[18] 
Frei, Daniel (1984). Alternatives to the First Use of Nuclear Weapons. ISBN 9781003053828.
Garnham, David (1985). "Extending Deterrence with German Nuclear Weapons". International Security. 10 (1): 96–110. doi:10.2307/2538791. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538791. Page 99.
Kolodziej, Edward A. (1988). "SDI, Alliance Coherence, and East—West Nuclear Stability". Rethinking the Nuclear Weapons Dilemma in Europe. Houndmills: The Macmillan Press. pp. 29–58. ISBN 978-1-349-09181-2.

[29] Frei, Daniel (1984). Alternatives to the First Use of Nuclear Weapons. ISBN 9781003053828.

[30] Garnham, David (1985). "Extending Deterrence with German Nuclear Weapons". International Security. 10 (1): 96–110. doi:10.2307/2538791. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538791. Page 99.

[31] Kolodziej, Edward A. (1988). "SDI, Alliance Coherence, and East—West Nuclear Stability". Rethinking the Nuclear Weapons Dilemma in Europe. Houndmills: The Macmillan Press. pp. 29–58. ISBN 978-1-349-09181-2.

[19] Posen, Barry R.; Van Evera, Stephen (1983). "Defense Policy and the Reagan Administration: Departure from Containment". International Security. 8 (1): 3–45. doi:10.2307/2538484. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538484. An excellent essay on the NATO conventional balance

[20] Brauch, Hans Günter; Unterseher, Lutz (June 1984). "Review Essay: Getting Rid of Nuclear Weapons: A Review of a Few Proposals for a Conventional Defense of Europe". Journal of Peace Research. 21 (2): 193–199. doi:10.1177/002234338402100209. ISSN 0022-3433. The ESEC study is in line with the 'bean counting' philosophy, a force balance that only marginally takes into account qualitative aspects — contrasting what Mearsheimer has done recently in a convincing manner.

[21] Lübkemeier, Eckhard (1985). "Extended Deterrence: Implications for Arms Limitation and Reduction". Bulletin of Peace Proposals. 16 (3): 249–254. doi:10.1177/096701068501600306. ISSN 0007-5035.

[22] Dean, Jonathan (1986). "Assessing the Warsaw Pact Threat to NATO's Central Front". The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs. 21 (3): 26–34. doi:10.1080/03932728608456594. ISSN 0393-2729.

[23] Weinstein, John M. (1983-07-15). "All Features Grate and Stall: Soviet Strategic Vulnerabilities and the Future of Deterrence" (PDF).

[24] Strachan, Hew (1985). "Conventional Defence in Europe". International Affairs. 61 (1): 27–43. doi:10.2307/2619778. ISSN 1473-799X. JSTOR 2619778.

[25] Simpson, John (1985). "New conventional weapon technologies and conventional disarmament". Arms Control. 6 (1): 82–96. doi:10.1080/01440388508403813. ISSN 0099-4561.

[26] Snyder, Jack Lewis (1985). "Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy". International Security. 9 (3): 89–108. doi:10.2307/2538588. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538588.

[27] Kaufmann, William Weed (1983). "Nonnuclear Deterrence". Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question. Brookings Institution. pp. 88–89. ISBN 0815781180.

[28] Mako, William P. (1983). U.S. Ground Forces and the Defense of Central Europe. Brookings Institution. ISBN 0815754442.

[29] Hamilton, Andrew (1983). "Redressing the Conventional Balance: NATO's Reserve Military Manpower". International Security. 10 (1): 111–136. doi:10.2307/2538792. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538792.

[30] Corcoran, Edward A. (1983-06-01). Improving Europe's Conventional Defenss. Strategic Issues Research Memorandum.

[31] Snyder, Jack Lewis (1988). "Limiting Offensive Conventional Forces: Soviet Proposals and Western Options". International Security. 12 (4): 48–77. doi:10.2307/2538994. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538994.

[Chn1988-32] Cohen, Eliot Asher (1988). "Toward Better Net Assessment: Rethinking the European Conventional Balance". International Security. 13 (1): 50–89. doi:10.2307/2538896. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538896.

[33] Friedberg, Aaron Louis (1988). "Review: The Assessment of Military Power: A Review Essay". International Security. 12 (3): 190–202. doi:10.2307/2538805. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538805.

[34] Sens, Allen Gregory (1988-08-17). NATO and the INF Controversy: Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, an the Atlantic Alliance (Thesis). Vancouver: University of British Columbi.

[35] Makinda, Samuel M. (1988). "Moscow and the INF treaty". Australian Outlook. 42 (3): 133–144. doi:10.1080/10357718808444974. ISSN 1035-7718.

[36] Thomson, James A. (1989). "An Unfavorable Situation: NATO and the Conventional Balance" (PDF). The Adelphi Papers. 29 (236): 72–102. doi:10.1080/05679328908448874. ISSN 0567-932X.

[37] Borinski, Phillipp (1989). "Mitigating West Germany's Strategic Dilemmas". Armed Forces & Society. 15 (4): 531–549. doi:10.1177/0095327X8901500404. ISSN 0095-327X.

[38] Jones, Peter (1985). "New Conventional Technologies and Their Possible Impact on Conventional Arms Control Verification in Europe". Arms Control. 10 (2): 152–167. doi:10.1080/01440388908403907. ISSN 0099-4561.

[39] Van Evera, Stephen (2009). "Foreword". American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat inflation since 9/11. pp. xi–xvi. ISBN 9780203879092.

[40] Thomson, James A. (2018). "Deterrence Then and Now". SIRIUS - Zeitschrift für Strategische Analysen. 2 (2): 1–8. doi:10.1515/sirius-2018-0024. eISSN 2510-2648.

[41] Watts, Barry D. (2007-12-24). "Ignoring reality: Problems of theory and evidence in security studies". Security Studies. 7 (2): 115–171. doi:10.1080/09636419708429344. ISSN 0963-6412.

[Tct2021-42] Tecott, Rachel; Halterman, Andrew (2020-09-30). "The Case for Campaign Analysis: A Method for Studying Military Operations" (PDF). International Security. 45 (4). ISSN 0162-2889.

[44] Nunn, Sam; Bartlett, Dewey Follett Sr. (1977). NATO and the New Soviet Threat: Report of Senator Sam Nunn and Senator Dewey F. Bartlett to the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

[46] White, Kenton (October 2016). "Credibility Analysis – Mearsheimer's viewpoint". British Defence Planning and Britain's NATO commitment, 1979 – 1985 (PDF) (Thesis). pp. 283–288.

[47] White, Kenton (2017). "Mearsheimer's Folly: NATO's Cold War Capability and Credibility". Infinity Journal. 5 (4). eISSN 2312-5888.

[Psh2016-48] Heydarian Pashakhanlou, Arash (2016-10-23). "Fear in the Works of Morgenthau, Waltz and Mearsheimer". Realism and Fear in International Relations: Morgenthau, Waltz and Mearsheimer Reconsidered. pp. 23–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41012-8_2. ISBN 978-3-319-41012-8.

[49] Stoll, Richard J. (1990). "The Russians Are Coming: A Computer Simulation". Armed Forces & Society. 16 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1177/0095327X9001600202. hdl:1911/75021. ISSN 0095-327X.

[50] Hardin, Bristow (June 1991). The militarized social democracy and racism: The relationships between militarism, racism and social welfare policy in the United States (Thesis). Santa Cruz: University of California.

[51] Leah, Christine M. (2015). "Deterrence and Arms Control in a Second Conventional Age". Comparative Strategy. 34 (5): 401–421. doi:10.1080/01495933.2015.1089122. ISSN 0149-5933.

[52] Motin, Dylan (2018-04-20). "The Making of a Blitzkrieg: Russia's Decision to Go to War with Afghanistan, Georgia, but not Ukraine" (PDF). The Institute for Basic Social Science. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-04-12.

[53] Rippy, Julian T. (2022-08-17). A Mixed-Methods Approach to Force Estimation in Military Operations Other Than War (Thesis). Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[54] Motin, Dylan (June 2024). "The Logic of U.S. Deployment in Norway: The Trump Administration and NATO's Northern Front". Journal of Global Strategic Studies. 4 (1): 50–71. eISSN 2798-4427.

[55] Dankbaar, Ben (1984). "Alternative Defense Policies and the Peace Movement". Journal of Peace Research. 21 (2): 141–155. doi:10.1177/002234338402100205. ISSN 0022-3433.

[57] 
Betts, Richard Kevin (1983). "Conventional Strategy: New Critics, Old Choices". International Security. 7 (4): 140–162. doi:10.2307/2626735. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2626735.
Lebow, Richard Ned (1985). "The Soviet Offensive in Europe: The Schlieffen Plan Revisited?". International Security. 9 (4): 44–78. doi:10.2307/2538541. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538541. Page 45.
Snyder, Jack; Sagan, Scott D. (1987). "The Origins of Offense and the Consequences of Counterforce". International Security. 11 (3): 187–198. doi:10.2307/2538891. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538891. Pages 191-192.
Cohen, Eliot Asher (1988). "Toward Better Net Assessment: Rethinking the European Conventional Balance". International Security. 13 (1): 50–89. doi:10.2307/2538896. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538896. Page 51.
Blackwill, Robert Dean (1988). "Conceptual Problems of Conventional Arms Control". International Security. 12 (4): 28–47. doi:10.2307/2538993. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538993.
Sutey, William K. (1993-05-14). The Active Defense and AirLand Battle in Soviet Military Thought (PDF). Page 46.
Tecott, Rachel; Halterman, Andrew (2020-09-30). "The Case for Campaign Analysis: A Method for Studying Military Operations" (PDF). International Security. 45 (4): 7. ISSN 0162-2889.
Sarantakes, Nicholas Evan (2023). "The Future-War Literature of the Reagan Era—Winning World War III in Fiction". Naval War College Review. 76 (3). ISSN 0028-1484.

[68] Betts, Richard Kevin (1983). "Conventional Strategy: New Critics, Old Choices". International Security. 7 (4): 140–162. doi:10.2307/2626735. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2626735.

[69] Lebow, Richard Ned (1985). "The Soviet Offensive in Europe: The Schlieffen Plan Revisited?". International Security. 9 (4): 44–78. doi:10.2307/2538541. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538541. Page 45.

[70] Snyder, Jack; Sagan, Scott D. (1987). "The Origins of Offense and the Consequences of Counterforce". International Security. 11 (3): 187–198. doi:10.2307/2538891. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538891. Pages 191-192.

[71] Cohen, Eliot Asher (1988). "Toward Better Net Assessment: Rethinking the European Conventional Balance". International Security. 13 (1): 50–89. doi:10.2307/2538896. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538896. Page 51.

[72] Blackwill, Robert Dean (1988). "Conceptual Problems of Conventional Arms Control". International Security. 12 (4): 28–47. doi:10.2307/2538993. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538993.

[73] Sutey, William K. (1993-05-14). The Active Defense and AirLand Battle in Soviet Military Thought (PDF). Page 46.

[74] Tecott, Rachel; Halterman, Andrew (2020-09-30). "The Case for Campaign Analysis: A Method for Studying Military Operations" (PDF). International Security. 45 (4): 7. ISSN 0162-2889.

[75] Sarantakes, Nicholas Evan (2023). "The Future-War Literature of the Reagan Era—Winning World War III in Fiction". Naval War College Review. 76 (3). ISSN 0028-1484.

[58] Christian, Joshua T. (2019). "An Examination of Force Ratios" (PDF). Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies, US Army Command and General Staff College.

[59] Rohn, Laurinda L. (May 1990). Conventional Forces in Europe: A New Approach to the Balance, Stability, and Arms Control (PDF). ISBN 0-8330-0687-8.

[60] Epstein, Joshua M. (1989). "The 3:1 Rule, the Adaptive Dynamic Model, and the Future of Security Studies". International Security. 13 (4): 90–127. doi:10.2307/2538781. ISSN 0162-2889. JSTOR 2538781.

[61] Kress, Moshe; Talmor, Irit (1999-07-14). "A new look at the 3:1 rule of combat through Markov Stochastic Lanchester models". Journal of the Operational Research Society. 50 (7): 733–744. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600758. ISSN 0160-5682.

[62] Junio, Timothy J.; Mahnken, Thomas G. (2013-09-17). "Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations". International Studies Review. 15 (3): 374–395. doi:10.1111/misr.12061. ISSN 1521-9488.

[63] — (2006-10-30) [recorded 2006-08-28]. Prof. John Mearsheimer on the Israel Lobby. National Press Club, Bill Hughes – via YouTube.

[64] Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-08-07). The liberal international order. Centre for Independent Studies – via YouTube. 54:15.

[65] Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-06-23). "The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War". Russia Matters.

[66] Mearsheimer, John J.; Ikenberry, Gilford John (2021-02-02). The Future of the Liberal International Order. The Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership – via YouTube.

[67] Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-06-16). The causes and consequences of the Ukraine war. he Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies – via YouTube. 2:07:15.

[68] Stubb, Cai-Göran Alexander (2022-06-08). Why Mearsheimer is wrong about Russia and the war in Ukraine: Five arguments from Alexander Stubb. Understanding the War – via Youtube.

[69] Anghel, Veronica; Stolle, Dietlind (2022-06-28). "In praise of reality, not realism: An answer to Mearsheimer". EUIdeas.

[70] Kostelka, Filip (2022-07-11). "John Mearsheimer's lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences". EUIdeas.

[71] Mastny, Vojtech (2001-11-01). "A Different World". Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[72] Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-11-22) [recorded 2012-10-17]. Why China Cannot Rise Peacefully. University of Ottawa – via YouTube. 1:30:45.

[73] Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-08-02). Imperial by Design. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 45:39.

[74] Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-03-07) [recorded 2012-10-18]. America's Imperial Impulse. Political Science Speaker Series. Carleton University – via YouTube. 51:03.

[75] Mearsheimer, John J. (2015-09-25). Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:14:15.

[76] McFaul, Michael Anthony (2014-10-17). "Moscow's Choice" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 167–171. ISSN 0015-7120.

[77] Sestanovich, Stephen (2014-10-17). "How the West Has Won" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 171–175. ISSN 0015-7120.

[78] Mearsheimer, John J. (2014-10-17). "Mearsheimer Replies" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. Vol. 93, no. 6. pp. 175–178. ISSN 0015-7120.

[79] Eisenhower, Susan Elaine (2015-09-01). "Perils of cornering Russia". United States Studies Centre.

[80] Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-11-04). Can China Rise Peacefully?. Jefferson Literary and Debating Society – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 1:20:34.

[81] Mearsheimer, John J. (2013-12-18). Can China Rise Peacefully?. Harper Lectures. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:21:47.

[82] Mearsheimer, John J. (2024-05-02) [delivered 2024-04-16]. Can China Rise Peacefully?. Public Policy Lecture Series. Reed College – via YouTube. 1:24:41.

[83] Ikenberry, John (2022-02-11). "The Real Liberal Bet" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[84] Nathan, Andrew James (2022-02-11). "The China Threat in Perspective" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[85] Ashton Thornton, Susan (2022-02-11). "The Barriers to War" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[86] Zhe, Sun (2022-02-11). "In Search of a Strategy" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[87] Mearsheimer, John J. (2022-02-11). "Mearsheimer Replies" (PDF). Foreign Affairs. ISSN 0015-7120.

[88] Orr, George E. (July 1983). "Effective Command of Combat Operations". Combat Operations C³I: Fundamentals and Interactions. Airpower Research Institute, Air University Press, 4th printing. pp. 90–113. ISBN 1585661023.

[89] Snyder, Jed C. (1985). "Review: Conventional Deterrence". Naval War College Review. 38 (3): 111–112. ISSN 0028-1484.

[90] Mäki-Ullakko, Ilkka (2023). Contribution of Military Logistics to Conventional Deterrence in the Case of Ukraine (Thesis). hdl:1969.1/6465.

[Wll2008-91] Williamson, Corbin (April 2008). Factors Affecting the Feasibility of a Warsaw Pact Invasion of Western Europe (Thesis). Texas A&M University.

[92] Romero, Philip J. (1991). A New Approach for the Design and Evaluation of Land Defense Concepts (PDF). ISBN 0-8330-0936-2.

[93] Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen M. (2008-05-23). "Our lobby, his lobby: The Israel Lobby authors reply to Gershom Gorenberg's criticisms in the last issue of Prospect". Prospect. eISSN 2059-6731.

[94] Mearsheimer, John J. (2007-12-20). Iraq, the Neocons and the Israel Lobby. FORA.tv – via YouTube. 6:24.

[95] Mearsheimer, John J. (2008-05-29). On AIPAC and Congress. Council for the National Interest, Bill Hughes – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 16:57.

[96] Mearsheimer, John J. (2011-05-27). Professor John Mearsheimer Speaks at Move Over AIPAC. Code Pink – via YouTube. Part 1. Part 2. 25:28.

[97] Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen (2012-08-13) [recorded 2007-10-29]. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt - The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. GBH Forum Network – via YouTube. 1:21:32.

[98] Mearsheimer, John J.; Walt, Stephen (2012-12-02) [recorded 2008-06-17]. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Center for International and Regional Studies – via YouTube. 38:05.

[99] Mearsheimer, John J. (2015-08-28). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:21:11.

[100] Mearsheimer, John J.; Feiler, Bruce (2018-04-05). Debating the Israel Lobby. Nonzero. Bloggingheads.tv. 1:10:22.

[101] Mearsheimer, John J. (2010-09-23). Lying in International Politics. Centre for International Governance Innovation – via YouTube. 1:35:33.

[102] Mearsheimer, John J. (2012-03-01). Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics with John Mearsheimer. The University of Chicago – via YouTube. 1:25:46.

[103] Mearsheimer, John J. (2020). "Response to C. William Walldorf Jr.'s Review". Perspectives on Politics. 18 (3): 894–895. doi:10.1017/S1537592720001796. ISSN 1537-5927.

[104] Diesen, Glenn; Babich, Dmitry; Babich, Mark (2018-10-24). Bullhorn: Realists. CrossTalk. RT.

[105] Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-10-10). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. The Bush School of Government and Public Service – via YouTube. 1:16:49.

[106] Mearsheimer, John J. (2020-02-13). The Great Delusion. FPA Research Series. Carleton University – via YouTube.

[107] Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-01-24) [recorded 2019-01-21]. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. SOAS University of London – via YouTube.

[108] Mearsheimer, John J. (2018-11-12) [recorded 2018-11-07]. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Center for International Security and Governance – via YouTube.

[109] Mearsheimer, John J. (2019-02-26). "Book Discussion with John Mearsheimer" (Interview). Interviewed by Duran, Burhanettin – via YouTube. 1:18:09.

[110] Mearsheimer, John J.; Tellis, Ashley J. (2023-10-03). How States Think: The Rationality of Foreign Policy. The Cato Institute – via YouTube. 1:31:54.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[a]

[b]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[42]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[c]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]