Talk:1 Thibault Square: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{WikiProject South Africa |class=Start |importance=Low }} {{WikiProject Architecture|class=Start|importance=Low}}' |
Photo Requested |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{oldafdfull| date = 17 November 2014 (UTC) | result = '''no consensus''' | page = 1 Thibault Square }} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{photo requested|in=Cape Town}} |
|||
== Deletion nomination == |
|||
I saw that is page was nominated for deletion due to a perceived lack of references proving notability. I have removed this nomination and oppose its deletion on two grounds: |
|||
# I have added 3 additional references to both expand contend about the location and help illustrate the building's notability. |
|||
# I feel that the article now meets [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] guidelines in the context of a [[WP:LOCAL|place of local interes]]. |
|||
P.S. I really dislike the Wiki bureaucratic codes to describe these issues and have thusly chosen to avoid them.--[[User:Discott|Discott]] ([[User talk:Discott|talk]]) 13:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:24, 12 June 2024
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Cape Town may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Deletion nomination
[edit]I saw that is page was nominated for deletion due to a perceived lack of references proving notability. I have removed this nomination and oppose its deletion on two grounds:
- I have added 3 additional references to both expand contend about the location and help illustrate the building's notability.
- I feel that the article now meets notability guidelines in the context of a place of local interes.
P.S. I really dislike the Wiki bureaucratic codes to describe these issues and have thusly chosen to avoid them.--Discott (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)