Jump to content

Bouri Formation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m WPCleaner (v1.09) Repaired link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Ethiopian
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Archeological area in Afar Region, Ethiopia}}
{{about|the [[Ethiopia|Ethiopian]] area rich in [[hominini]] remains|the [[Libya]]n offshore [[oil field]]|Bouri Field}}
{{about|the [[Ethiopia]]n area rich in [[hominini]] remains|the [[Libya]]n offshore [[oil field]]|Bouri Field}}
[[Image:Herto, Ethiopia ; Homo sapiens idaltu 1997 discovery map.png|thumb|right|Location of Bouri Formation in [[Ethiopia]]]]
[[Image:Herto, Ethiopia ; Homo sapiens idaltu 1997 discovery map.png|thumb|right|440px|Location of the Bouri Formation and the [[Afar Triangle]] ([[Afar Depression]]), [[Ethiopia]]]]


The '''Bouri Formation ''' is an area in the Middle [[Awash Valley]], in [[Ethiopia]] that has provided a rich source of [[Australopithecines]] and [[Homo]] fossils, [[Artifact (archaeology)|artifact]]s and bones of large mammal with cut marks from [[butchery]]. It is part of the [[Afar Depression]] that has created other rich human fossil sites such as Gona and [[Hadar]].
The '''Bouri Formation''' is a sequence of sedimentary deposits that is the source of [[australopithecine]] and [[Homo]] (that is, [[hominin]]) fossils, [[Artifact (archaeology)|artifact]]s, and bones of large mammals with cut marks from butchery with tools by early [[hominins]]. It is located in the Middle [[Awash Valley]], in [[Ethiopia]], [[East Africa]], and is a part of the [[Afar Depression]] that has provided rich human fossil sites such as [[Gona, Ethiopia|Gona]] and [[Hadar, Ethiopia|Hadar]].


The Bouri Formation stretches down much of the length and breadth of the Bouri "peninsula", which projects across the dry bed of the Afar Depression. The Formation is sufficiently eroded to expose three geological members or layers: the Hatayae, the Dakanihylo, and the Herto. Human remains with signs of having been prepared for burial have been found in the Upper Herto layers.
It consists of three [[geological unit]]s called members in which fossils and artifacts from different periods of human evolution has been excavated. The lowest Hatayae member (2.5 mya) in which [[Australopithecus garhi]] fossils have been found, the Dakanihylo member (1 mya) and [[Homo erectus]], and the Herto member lower (260 ka) and upper layers (160 to 154 ka) and [[Homo sapiens idaltu]].

Human remains from the Upper Herto layers have been found with signs of having been changed after death by mortuary practices.


==Geology==
==Geology==
The Bouri Formation occurs in the Bouri “peninsula”, a geological [[Fault (geology)|fault]] raised [[Horst (geology)|horst]] that diverts the [[Awash River]] and forms a partial dam creating [[Lake Yardi]]. The peninsula is about 4 km wide and 10 km in length and lies in a NNW-SSE direction in the [[Quaternary]] period [[rift zone]] of the southern [[Afar Region]].
The Bouri "peninsula" is a geological [[Fault (geology)|fault]]-raised [[Horst (geology)|horst]] that diverts the [[Awash River]], forming a partial dam and creating [[Lake Yardi]]; and it contains the Bouri Formation. The peninsula is about 4 km wide by 10 km long, and lies in a NNW-SSE direction in the [[Quaternary]]-period [[rift zone]] in the southern part of the [[Afar Depression]] ([[Afar Triangle]]).


The Bouri peninsula contains the Bouri formation, a [[sediment]] area that stretches down much of its length and breath and is 80 m thick. It is eroded to expose three geological members or layers: the Hatayae (also known as Hata), the Dakanihylo (also known as Daka) and the Herto.<ref name="Clark">Clark JD, Beyene Y, WoldeGabriel G, Hart WK, Renne PR, Gilbert H, Defleur A, Suwa G, Katoh S, Ludwig KR, Boisserie JR, Asfaw B, White TD. (2003). Stratigraphic, chronological and behavioural contexts of Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 423(6941):747-52. PMID 12802333</ref><ref name="de Heinzelin">de Heinzelin J, Clark JD, White T, Hart W, Renne P, WoldeGabriel G, Beyene Y, Vrba E. (1999). Environment and behavior of 2.5-million-year-old Bouri hominids. Science. 284(5414):625-9. {{DOI|10.1126/science.284.5414.625}} PMID 10213682</ref><ref name=" Asfaw99">Asfaw B, White T, Lovejoy O, Latimer B, Simpson S, Suwa G. (1999). Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. Science. 284(5414):629-35. {{DOI|10.1126/science.284.5414.629}} PMID 10213683</ref><ref name=" Asfaw02">Asfaw B, Gilbert WH, Beyene Y, Hart WK, Renne PR, WoldeGabriel G, Vrba ES, White TD. (2002). Remains of Homo erectus from Bouri, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 416(6878):317-20. PMID 11907576</ref>
The Bouri Formation is a [[sediment]] area some 80 m thick that stretches down much of the length and breath of the peninsula. The formation consists of three [[geological unit]]s, called members, from which fossils and artifacts of different periods of human evolution have been excavated. They are: the lowest member, named Hatayae, or the Hata, dated to 2.5 million years ago (mya)—and in which fossils of ''[[Australopithecus garhi]]'' were found; the Dakanihylo, or Daka, member, one mya—fossils of [[Homo erectus]] were found; and the Herto member, Lower layer at 260 kya, and Upper layers at 160 to 154 kya—fossils of [[Homo sapiens idaltu]] were found.<!-------------><ref name="Clark">Clark JD, Beyene Y, WoldeGabriel G, Hart WK, Renne PR, Gilbert H, Defleur A, Suwa G, Katoh S, Ludwig KR, Boisserie JR, Asfaw B, White TD. (2003). Stratigraphic, chronological and behavioural contexts of Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 423(6941):747-52. {{PMID|12802333}}</ref><ref name="de Heinzelin">de Heinzelin J, Clark JD, White T, Hart W, Renne P, WoldeGabriel G, Beyene Y, Vrba E. (1999). Environment and behavior of 2.5-million-year-old Bouri hominids. Science. 284(5414):625-9. {{doi|10.1126/science.284.5414.625}} {{PMID|10213682}}</ref><ref name=" Asfaw99">Asfaw B, White T, Lovejoy O, Latimer B, Simpson S, Suwa G. (1999). Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. Science. 284(5414):629-35. {{doi|10.1126/science.284.5414.629}} {{PMID|10213683}}</ref><ref name=" Asfaw02">Asfaw B, Gilbert WH, Beyene Y, Hart WK, Renne PR, WoldeGabriel G, Vrba ES, White TD. (2002). Remains of Homo erectus from Bouri, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 416(6878):317-20. {{PMID|11907576}}</ref>


The area is of importance since active [[tectonic]]s in the southern Afar Depression in the last few million years have created varied types of habitats for early hominids during the [[Plio-Pleistocene]]. Then more recently these habitats laid down in sedimentary rocks have been [[Tectonic uplift|uplifted]] allowing their [[erosion]] and so accessibility to [[paleoanthropology|paleoanthropologist]]s.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> Occasional volcanic eruptions have also left volcanic [[tuff]] layers that allow the sedimentary deposits to be accurately [[Argon–argon dating|argon–argon isotope dated]].
The area is important because active [[tectonic]]s in the Afar Depression created varying habitats for early [[hominins]] across the most recent few million years known informally as the [[Plio-Pleistocene]]. These habitats, laid down in sedimentary rocks, have since been [[Tectonic uplift|uplifted]], which allowed their [[erosion]] over time and their accessibility today to [[paleoanthropology|paleoanthropologist]]s.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> Volcanic eruptions have left volcanic [[tuff]] layers that enable accurate dating of the sedimentary deposits via [[Argon–argon dating]].


==Hatayae==
==Hatayae==
The Hatayae layer as its base is 40 m thick made up of variegated [[silt]] clay and [[paleosol]]s, [[zeolitic]] and [[bentonitic]] tuffs, [[carbonate rock|carbonate]]s that are [[Pedogenesis|pedogenic]], [[sandstone]] with [[bivalve]] and [[gastropod]] shells, and [[mudstone]]. It was deposited in a [[floodplain]] along [[river delta]] channels and a shallow fluctuating [[lake]] dated to around 2.5 mya.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>
The Hatayae layer is 40 m thick at its base and is composed of variegated [[silt]] clay and [[paleosol]]s, [[zeolitic]] and [[bentonitic]] tuffs, [[carbonate rock|carbonate]]s that are [[Pedogenesis|pedogenic]], [[sandstone]] with [[bivalve]] and [[gastropod]] shells, and [[mudstone]]. It was deposited in a [[floodplain]] alongside [[river delta]] channels and a shallow fluctuating [[lake]] dated to around 2.5 mya.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>


In the Hatayae Member have been found the remains of [[Australopithecus garhi]]. These are most complete for the specimen, BOU-VP-12/130. This species is “descended from Australopithecus afarensis and is a candidate ancestor for early Homo.<ref name="Asfaw99"/>
In the Hatayae member have been found the remains of ''[[Australopithecus garhi]]'', the most complete specimen of which is [[BOU-VP-12/130]]. According to Asfaw and White, et al. (1999), that species is "..descended from ''[[Australopithecus afarensis]]'' and is a candidate ancestor for early Homo."<ref name="Asfaw99"/>


[[Excavation (archaeology)|Excavation]]s have in general failed to find large numbers of [[stone tool]]s. The explanation for this is the lack of raw materials for making them on lake margins. This would have been due to the lack of streams strong enough to carry pebbles, and the absence of nearby basalt [[outcrop]]s.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>
[[Excavation (archaeology)|Excavation]]s in general have failed to disclose large numbers of [[stone tool]]s. The likely explanation is the lack of raw materials on lake margins, which, in turn, is likely due to the lack of streams strong enough to carry hand-sized pebbles and the absence of nearby [[outcrop]]s of basalt.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>


However, in spite of rarity some isolated and widely scattered cores and flakes have been found of Mode I technology. As the excavators note “our surveys and excavations have demonstrated that early hominids were actively using stone tools on the PlioceneHata landscape.”<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> Moreover that “It is not currently possible to positively identify the creators of the earliest stone tools here or at Gona, even though A. garhi is currently the only recognized hominid taxon recovered from Hata sediments.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>
In spite of rarity, some isolated and widely scattered cores and flakes of [[Oldowan|Mode I]] technology have been found. The excavators (de Heinzelin, et al., 2002) report: "..our surveys and excavations have demonstrated that early hominids [hominins] were actively using stone tools on the Pliocene-Hata landscape"; and: "It is not currently possible to positively identify the creators of the earliest stone tools here or at Gona, even though ''A. garhi'' is currently the only recognized hominid [hominin] taxon recovered from Hata sediments."<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>


Evidence of the existence of stone tools is also provided by bones of large mammals of such as [[alcelaphinae]] (Wildebeest related [[bovid]]s) and [[Hipparion]] (an extinct [[genus]] of three-toed horse) by hominids showing butchery cut marks including those used to remove an animal’s tongue.<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> “These are the earliest documented percussion marks made by hominids who were presumably processing these bones for contained fatty marrow. …These are the earliest documented cut marks made by hominids.” <ref name="de Heinzelin"/> As noted by its excavators, the evidence from the site shows that “a major function of the earliest known tools was meat and marrow processing of large carcasses. Finally, they extend this pattern of butchery by hominids well into the Pliocene.”<ref name="de Heinzelin"/>
Existence of stone tools is also evidenced by bones of large mammals—such as [[alcelaphinae]] (Wildebeest related [[bovid]]s) and [[Hipparion]], an extinct [[genus]] of three-toed horse—that show butchery cut marks by hominins including those made in removing an animal's tongue. "These are the earliest documented percussion marks made by hominids [hominins], who were presumably processing these bones for contained fatty marrow"; and, "These are the earliest documented cut marks made by hominids [hominins]."<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> As concluded by the excavators, the evidence from the site shows "..a major function of the earliest known tools was meat and marrow processing of large carcasses."<ref name="de Heinzelin"/> This pattern of butchery processing of large prey was maintained by hominins well into the Pliocene.


==Dakanihylo==
==Dakanihylo==
The Dakanihylo layer is 22 to 45 m thick and made up of [[pumice]] sandstone that is [[cross-bedding|cross-bedded]]. It is dated to 1 mya and found in the southern half of the Bouri horst. Fossils suggest open grassland (377 species of [[bovid]]s including three new species and two new genera, and water-margin habitats (species of [[Kobus (antelope)|Kobus antelope]] and abundant [[Hippopotamus]]).<ref name="Asfaw02"/>
The Dakanihylo (Daka) layer is 22 to 45 m thick and composed of [[pumice]] sandstone that is [[cross-bedding|cross-bedded]]; it is situated in the southern half of the Bouri horst and dated to 1 mya. Fossils found in the layer suggest open grassland—some 377 species of [[bovid]]s (including three new species and two new genera); and water-margin habitats—species of [[Kobus (antelope)|Kobus antelope]] and abundant [[Hippopotamus]].<ref name="Asfaw02"/>
Early [[Acheulean]] stone tools such as [[hand axe]]s and [[Cleaver(tool)|cleaver]]s have also been found in the Daka member, as well as evidence of butchery processing on [[equid]], bovid and hippo bones.<ref name="Asfaw02"/>


''[[Homo erectus]]'' fossils include the specimen [[BOU-VP-2/66]], or the [[Daka skull]], an [[Calvaria (skull)|incomplete skull]] that had an [[Endocranial cast|endocranial]] capacity of 995&nbsp;cm<sup>3</sup>.<ref name="Asfaw02"/> These fossils (of ''H. erectus'') are important to the current debate as to whether Asian and African ''H. erectus'' were actually different [[Human taxonomy|human species]]. Asfaw, et al. (2002) reports: 1) that these fossils do not support "..the hypothesis of a deep [[cladogenesis]] between African and Asian ''H. erectus'' ..."; and 2) "..that geographic subdivision of early ''H. erectus'' into separate species lineages is biologically misleading, artificially inflating early Pleistocene species diversity."<ref name="Asfaw02"/> Further, they suggest that "..by 1 Myr the taxon had colonized much of the Old World without speciating. A finding of considerable biogeographic and behavioural significance".<ref name="Asfaw02"/>
In the Dakanihylo Member has been found early [[Acheulean]] stone tools such as [[hand axe]]s and [[Cleaver (tool)|cleaver]]s and evidence of butchery upon [[equid]]s, bovid and hippo bones.<ref name="Asfaw02"/>

[[Homo erectus]] fossils include specimen BOU-VP-2/66 of an [[Calvaria (skull)|incomplete skull]] that had an [[Endocranial cast|endocranial]] capacity of 995&nbsp;cm<sup>3</sup>.<ref name="Asfaw02"/> These fossils of H. erectus are important since it has been suggested that Asian and African H, erectus were different [[Human taxonomy|human species]]. But these fossils do not support “the hypothesis of a deep cladogenesis between African and Asian H. erectus” and that “that geographic subdivision of early H. erectus into separate species lineages is biologically misleading, artificially inflating early Pleistocene species diversity.<ref name="Asfaw02"/> Moreover, they suggest that the H. erectus taxon had “by 1 Myr the taxon had colonized much of the Old World without speciating. A finding of
considerable biogeographic and behavioural significance”.<ref name="Asfaw02"/>


==Herto==
==Herto==
The Herto layer is named after a local village and consists of a 15–20 m thick layer. It is found in the southwestern part of the Bouri horst and consists of a lower and an upper layer. The division between the Lower and Upper Herto layers is characterized by an erosion surface filled with rounded pebbles.
The Herto layers consist of a 15–20 m thick main sequence found in the southwestern part of the Bouri peninsula. The division between the Lower and Upper Herto layers is characterized by an [[erosion surface]] filled with rounded pebbles.


===Lower Herto===
===Lower Herto===
This consists of [[lignite]], pinkish carbonate layers, and silty clays of predominantly lake origin containing gastropods and bivalves. It is dated to 260 ka. Late [[Acheulean]] tools are found together with “hominid remains that are as yet unknown”. Humans in this habitat lived next to a freshwater lake and killed large mammals such as [[hippopotamid]]s.<ref name="Clark"/><ref>DeHeinzelin J, Clark J D, Schick KD. Gilbert WH. (2000) The Acheulean and the Plio-Pleistocene Deposits of the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Annales Sciences géologiques. 104: (whole issue). {{ OCLC|46917504 }}</ref>
This layer presents [[lignite]], veins of pink carbonate, and silty clays (of predominantly lake origin) containing gastropod and bivalve fossils; it is dated to 260 thousands of years ago (kya). Late [[Acheulean]] tools are found associated with hominin remains as yet unclassified. Humans in this habitat lived next to a freshwater lake and killed large mammals such as [[hippopotamid]]s.<ref name="Clark"/><ref>DeHeinzelin J, Clark J D, Schick KD. Gilbert WH. (2000) The Acheulean and the Plio-Pleistocene Deposits of the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Annales Sciences géologiques. 104: (whole issue). {{ OCLC|46917504 }}</ref>


===Upper Herto===
===Upper Herto===
The Upper Herto Member changes from the [[fluvial]] and lake-margin deposits of the lower layer to yellow sandstone and date to between 160 ka and 154 ka BP. Immediately above the erosion surface separating the two layers is [[volcanic]] sandstone and [[gravel]] deposits that have variable thickness. It is a yellow-brown to grey colour and shows cross-bedded sedimentation containing pumice rocks up to 15&nbsp;cm in diameter. This layer has produced all the human fossils and tools found in the Upper layer. The Upper layer is topped by a volcanic tuff.<ref name="Clark"/> An important feature is that two volcanic layers of very fine ash occur one just below the hominid fossils and one just above and this allows an accurate date by argon–argon dating to between 160,000 and 154,000 years ago to be given to adjacent sediment layers and their fossils. This is significant “because the accurate dating of faunas and artefacts of many sites of this general antiquity in Pleistocene Africa has proved notoriously difficult.<ref name="Clark"/>
The Upper Herto member changes to yellow sandstone (from the [[fluvial]] and lake-margin deposits of the lower layer), and dates to between 160 and 154 kya. Immediately above the erosion surface separating the two layers is a sequence of [[volcanic]] sandstone and [[gravel]] deposits of variable thicknesses. It shows cross-bedded sedimentation containing pumice rocks and has produced all the human fossils and tools found in the Upper layer. The Upper layer is topped by a volcanic tuff.<ref name="Clark"/> Two volcanic layers of very fine ash occur, one just below the hominin fossils and one just above; this important feature allows accurate [[argon–argon dating]] of adjacent sedimentary layers and their fossils, as reported above. This is valuable "..because the accurate dating of faunas and artefacts of many sites of this general antiquity in Pleistocene Africa has proved notoriously difficult."<ref name="Clark"/>


In this layer have been found early [[Middle Stone Age]] tools and the remains of [[Homo sapiens idaltu]]. Most of the tools are [[Scraper (archaeology)|scraper]]s, cleavers, and various [[lithic core]]s. Hand axes, picks and [[Blade (archaeology)|blade]]s are rare. Most stone tools are made of fine-grained [[basalt]], except for points and blades that were made from [[obsidian]]. Many are made with the [[Levallois technique]]. They are comparable to those found in the Garba III layer at [[Melka Kunture]]. <Blockquote>As at Herto, Garba III includes terminal Acheulean hand axes, typical Levalloisian method, and many retouched tools on flakes (side-scrapers and end-scrapers, backed knives, burins, unifacial and bifacial points). The Garba III assemblage has been considered transitional between the Acheulean and the MSA.<ref name="Clark"/></Blockquote>
In this layer have been found early [[Middle Stone Age]] (MSA) tools and the remains of [[Homo sapiens idaltu]]. Most of the tools are [[Scraper (archaeology)|scraper]]s, cleavers, and various [[lithic core]]s; but hand axes, picks and [[Blade (archaeology)|blade]]s are rare. Most stone tools are made of fine-grained [[basalt]] except for points and blades made from [[obsidian]]. Many are made with the [[Levallois technique]]; these are comparable to those found in the Garba III layer at [[Melka Kunture]]. <blockquote>As at Herto, Garba III includes terminal Acheulean hand axes, typical Levalloisian method, and many retouched tools on flakes (side-scrapers and end-scrapers, backed knives, burins, unifacial and bifacial points). The Garba III assemblage has been considered transitional between the Acheulean and the MSA.<ref name="Clark"/></blockquote>


In this layer are found a large number of Hippopotamus bones: “One occurrence shows abundant remains of several hippo calves, mostly newborn to a few weeks old, scattered together with butchered adults.”.<ref name="Clark"/>
In this layer are found a large number of Hippopotamus bones: "One occurrence shows abundant remains of several hippo calves, mostly newborn to a few weeks old, scattered together with butchered adults".<ref name="Clark"/>


===Mortuary practices===
===Mortuary practices===
Of 15 of the 24 recovered fragments of humans in the Upper Herto layer have cut marks due to [[soft tissue]] removal. It has been noted that “The latter pattern of bone surface modification is almost never present in hominid or nonhuman faunal remains processed for consumption, and is therefore unlikely to represent evidence of utilitarian or economic behaviour. On one skull, “this defleshing manipulation must have occurred after removal of the mandible. The intentional and deliberate removal of soft tissues such as basicranial vessels, nerves and muscles is therefore indicated. The specimen lacks the entire occipital region surrounding the foramen magnum, and the edges of this broken region are smooth and polished, as are the specimen’s unweathered parietal surfaces.<ref name="Clark"/>
Of 15 of the 24 recovered fragments of humans in the Upper Herto layer have cut marks due to [[soft tissue]] removal. Clark, et al., (2003) reports that "The latter pattern of bone surface modification is almost never present in hominid [hominin] or nonhuman faunal remains processed for consumption, and is therefore unlikely to represent evidence of utilitarian or economic behaviour." On one skull, "..this defleshing manipulation must have occurred after removal of the mandible. The intentional and deliberate removal of soft tissues such as basicranial vessels, nerves and muscles is therefore indicated. The specimen lacks the entire occipital region surrounding the foramen magnum, and the edges of this broken region are smooth and polished, as are the specimen’s unweathered parietal surfaces."<ref name="Clark"/>


[[Ethnographic]] study upon modern cultures suggests that such post-mortem manipulation could be due to “curation of human remains as part of mortuary practices”.<ref name="Clark"/>
[[Ethnographic]] study upon modern cultures suggests that such post-mortem manipulation could be due to "..curation of human remains as part of mortuary practices".<ref name="Clark"/>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Omo remains]]
* [[List of fossil sites]]
* [[List of fossil sites]]
* [[List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Ethiopia]]


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist}}


[[Category:Geologic formations of Ethiopia]]
[[Category:Middle Stone Age]]
[[Category:Paleoanthropological sites]]
[[Category:Pleistocene Series of Africa]]
[[Category:Archaeological sites in Ethiopia]]
[[Category:Paleontology in Ethiopia]]
[[Category:Sandstone formations]]
[[Category:Tuff formations]]
[[Category:Lacustrine deposits]]
[[Category:Deltaic deposits]]
[[Category:Afar Region]]
[[Category:Afar Region]]
[[Category:Archaeological sites in Ethiopia]]
[[Category:Awash River]]
[[Category:Awash River]]
[[Category:Middle Stone Age]]
[[Category:Archaeological sites of Eastern Africa]]
[[Category:Paleoanthropological sites]]
[[Category:Pleistocene paleontological sites of Africa]]

[[es:Herto Bouri]]

Latest revision as of 08:35, 26 December 2023

Location of the Bouri Formation and the Afar Triangle (Afar Depression), Ethiopia

The Bouri Formation is a sequence of sedimentary deposits that is the source of australopithecine and Homo (that is, hominin) fossils, artifacts, and bones of large mammals with cut marks from butchery with tools by early hominins. It is located in the Middle Awash Valley, in Ethiopia, East Africa, and is a part of the Afar Depression that has provided rich human fossil sites such as Gona and Hadar.

The Bouri Formation stretches down much of the length and breadth of the Bouri "peninsula", which projects across the dry bed of the Afar Depression. The Formation is sufficiently eroded to expose three geological members or layers: the Hatayae, the Dakanihylo, and the Herto. Human remains with signs of having been prepared for burial have been found in the Upper Herto layers.

Geology

[edit]

The Bouri "peninsula" is a geological fault-raised horst that diverts the Awash River, forming a partial dam and creating Lake Yardi; and it contains the Bouri Formation. The peninsula is about 4 km wide by 10 km long, and lies in a NNW-SSE direction in the Quaternary-period rift zone in the southern part of the Afar Depression (Afar Triangle).

The Bouri Formation is a sediment area some 80 m thick that stretches down much of the length and breath of the peninsula. The formation consists of three geological units, called members, from which fossils and artifacts of different periods of human evolution have been excavated. They are: the lowest member, named Hatayae, or the Hata, dated to 2.5 million years ago (mya)—and in which fossils of Australopithecus garhi were found; the Dakanihylo, or Daka, member, one mya—fossils of Homo erectus were found; and the Herto member, Lower layer at 260 kya, and Upper layers at 160 to 154 kya—fossils of Homo sapiens idaltu were found.[1][2][3][4]

The area is important because active tectonics in the Afar Depression created varying habitats for early hominins across the most recent few million years known informally as the Plio-Pleistocene. These habitats, laid down in sedimentary rocks, have since been uplifted, which allowed their erosion over time and their accessibility today to paleoanthropologists.[2] Volcanic eruptions have left volcanic tuff layers that enable accurate dating of the sedimentary deposits via Argon–argon dating.

Hatayae

[edit]

The Hatayae layer is 40 m thick at its base and is composed of variegated silt clay and paleosols, zeolitic and bentonitic tuffs, carbonates that are pedogenic, sandstone with bivalve and gastropod shells, and mudstone. It was deposited in a floodplain alongside river delta channels and a shallow fluctuating lake dated to around 2.5 mya.[2]

In the Hatayae member have been found the remains of Australopithecus garhi, the most complete specimen of which is BOU-VP-12/130. According to Asfaw and White, et al. (1999), that species is "..descended from Australopithecus afarensis and is a candidate ancestor for early Homo."[3]

Excavations in general have failed to disclose large numbers of stone tools. The likely explanation is the lack of raw materials on lake margins, which, in turn, is likely due to the lack of streams strong enough to carry hand-sized pebbles and the absence of nearby outcrops of basalt.[2]

In spite of rarity, some isolated and widely scattered cores and flakes of Mode I technology have been found. The excavators (de Heinzelin, et al., 2002) report: "..our surveys and excavations have demonstrated that early hominids [hominins] were actively using stone tools on the Pliocene-Hata landscape"; and: "It is not currently possible to positively identify the creators of the earliest stone tools here or at Gona, even though A. garhi is currently the only recognized hominid [hominin] taxon recovered from Hata sediments."[2]

Existence of stone tools is also evidenced by bones of large mammals—such as alcelaphinae (Wildebeest related bovids) and Hipparion, an extinct genus of three-toed horse—that show butchery cut marks by hominins including those made in removing an animal's tongue. "These are the earliest documented percussion marks made by hominids [hominins], who were presumably processing these bones for contained fatty marrow"; and, "These are the earliest documented cut marks made by hominids [hominins]."[2] As concluded by the excavators, the evidence from the site shows "..a major function of the earliest known tools was meat and marrow processing of large carcasses."[2] This pattern of butchery processing of large prey was maintained by hominins well into the Pliocene.

Dakanihylo

[edit]

The Dakanihylo (Daka) layer is 22 to 45 m thick and composed of pumice sandstone that is cross-bedded; it is situated in the southern half of the Bouri horst and dated to 1 mya. Fossils found in the layer suggest open grassland—some 377 species of bovids (including three new species and two new genera); and water-margin habitats—species of Kobus antelope and abundant Hippopotamus.[4] Early Acheulean stone tools such as hand axes and cleavers have also been found in the Daka member, as well as evidence of butchery processing on equid, bovid and hippo bones.[4]

Homo erectus fossils include the specimen BOU-VP-2/66, or the Daka skull, an incomplete skull that had an endocranial capacity of 995 cm3.[4] These fossils (of H. erectus) are important to the current debate as to whether Asian and African H. erectus were actually different human species. Asfaw, et al. (2002) reports: 1) that these fossils do not support "..the hypothesis of a deep cladogenesis between African and Asian H. erectus ..."; and 2) "..that geographic subdivision of early H. erectus into separate species lineages is biologically misleading, artificially inflating early Pleistocene species diversity."[4] Further, they suggest that "..by 1 Myr the taxon had colonized much of the Old World without speciating. A finding of considerable biogeographic and behavioural significance".[4]

Herto

[edit]

The Herto layers consist of a 15–20 m thick main sequence found in the southwestern part of the Bouri peninsula. The division between the Lower and Upper Herto layers is characterized by an erosion surface filled with rounded pebbles.

Lower Herto

[edit]

This layer presents lignite, veins of pink carbonate, and silty clays (of predominantly lake origin) containing gastropod and bivalve fossils; it is dated to 260 thousands of years ago (kya). Late Acheulean tools are found associated with hominin remains as yet unclassified. Humans in this habitat lived next to a freshwater lake and killed large mammals such as hippopotamids.[1][5]

Upper Herto

[edit]

The Upper Herto member changes to yellow sandstone (from the fluvial and lake-margin deposits of the lower layer), and dates to between 160 and 154 kya. Immediately above the erosion surface separating the two layers is a sequence of volcanic sandstone and gravel deposits of variable thicknesses. It shows cross-bedded sedimentation containing pumice rocks and has produced all the human fossils and tools found in the Upper layer. The Upper layer is topped by a volcanic tuff.[1] Two volcanic layers of very fine ash occur, one just below the hominin fossils and one just above; this important feature allows accurate argon–argon dating of adjacent sedimentary layers and their fossils, as reported above. This is valuable "..because the accurate dating of faunas and artefacts of many sites of this general antiquity in Pleistocene Africa has proved notoriously difficult."[1]

In this layer have been found early Middle Stone Age (MSA) tools and the remains of Homo sapiens idaltu. Most of the tools are scrapers, cleavers, and various lithic cores; but hand axes, picks and blades are rare. Most stone tools are made of fine-grained basalt except for points and blades made from obsidian. Many are made with the Levallois technique; these are comparable to those found in the Garba III layer at Melka Kunture.

As at Herto, Garba III includes terminal Acheulean hand axes, typical Levalloisian method, and many retouched tools on flakes (side-scrapers and end-scrapers, backed knives, burins, unifacial and bifacial points). The Garba III assemblage has been considered transitional between the Acheulean and the MSA.[1]

In this layer are found a large number of Hippopotamus bones: "One occurrence shows abundant remains of several hippo calves, mostly newborn to a few weeks old, scattered together with butchered adults".[1]

Mortuary practices

[edit]

Of 15 of the 24 recovered fragments of humans in the Upper Herto layer have cut marks due to soft tissue removal. Clark, et al., (2003) reports that "The latter pattern of bone surface modification is almost never present in hominid [hominin] or nonhuman faunal remains processed for consumption, and is therefore unlikely to represent evidence of utilitarian or economic behaviour." On one skull, "..this defleshing manipulation must have occurred after removal of the mandible. The intentional and deliberate removal of soft tissues such as basicranial vessels, nerves and muscles is therefore indicated. The specimen lacks the entire occipital region surrounding the foramen magnum, and the edges of this broken region are smooth and polished, as are the specimen’s unweathered parietal surfaces."[1]

Ethnographic study upon modern cultures suggests that such post-mortem manipulation could be due to "..curation of human remains as part of mortuary practices".[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Clark JD, Beyene Y, WoldeGabriel G, Hart WK, Renne PR, Gilbert H, Defleur A, Suwa G, Katoh S, Ludwig KR, Boisserie JR, Asfaw B, White TD. (2003). Stratigraphic, chronological and behavioural contexts of Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 423(6941):747-52. PMID 12802333
  2. ^ a b c d e f g de Heinzelin J, Clark JD, White T, Hart W, Renne P, WoldeGabriel G, Beyene Y, Vrba E. (1999). Environment and behavior of 2.5-million-year-old Bouri hominids. Science. 284(5414):625-9. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.625 PMID 10213682
  3. ^ a b Asfaw B, White T, Lovejoy O, Latimer B, Simpson S, Suwa G. (1999). Australopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from Ethiopia. Science. 284(5414):629-35. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.629 PMID 10213683
  4. ^ a b c d e f Asfaw B, Gilbert WH, Beyene Y, Hart WK, Renne PR, WoldeGabriel G, Vrba ES, White TD. (2002). Remains of Homo erectus from Bouri, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature. 416(6878):317-20. PMID 11907576
  5. ^ DeHeinzelin J, Clark J D, Schick KD. Gilbert WH. (2000) The Acheulean and the Plio-Pleistocene Deposits of the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Annales Sciences géologiques. 104: (whole issue). OCLC 46917504