Jump to content

Domenico Morosini: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Fixed a typo.
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Doge of Venice from 1148 to 1156}}
{{Infobox officeholder
| name = Domenico Morosini
| image =
| caption =
| order =
| office = Doge of Venice
| term_start = 1148
| term_end = 1156
| predecessor =
| successor =
| birth_name =
| birth_date = Unknown
| birth_place =
| death_date = 1156
| death_place =
| resting_place =
| spouse =
| parents =
| alma_mater =
| profession =
}}
[[File:Doge Marin Morosini.png|thumb|right|150px|Coat of arms of the Morosini family]]
[[File:Doge Marin Morosini.png|thumb|right|150px|Coat of arms of the Morosini family]]
'''Domenico Morosini''' (died February 1156) was the thirty-seventh [[Doge of Venice|doge]] of the [[Republic of Venice]], reigning from 1148 until his death in 1156.
'''Domenico Morosini''' (died February 1156) was the thirty-seventh [[Doge of Venice|doge]] of the [[Republic of Venice]], reigning from 1148 until his death in 1156.
Line 6: Line 28:


==Private life==
==Private life==
Morosini's early years are difficult to reconstruct, due to the absence of reliable records and sources. As a matter of fact, his birthyear is unknown, as are the activities and connections of his family before his interest in politics.<ref>''Historia ducum venetiorum'', edited by H. Simonsfeld, ''Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Scriptores'', 14: 72-89.</ref><br />
Morosini's early years are difficult to reconstruct, due to the absence of reliable records and sources. As a matter of fact, his birthyear is unknown, as are the activities and connections of his family before his interest in politics.<ref>''Historia ducum venetiorum'', edited by H. Simonsfeld, ''Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Scriptores'', 14: 72-89.</ref> This unusual lack of publicly recorded information is likely because his dukedom was relatively unremarkable in terms of conquests, expansion, and events of significance — historians of the Republic would have had little interest in "digging up the past" either to glorify or to mar his legacy. He was married to a woman named Sophia, who was according to legend a captive from the East.<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/dogaressasofveni00stal#page/316/mode/2up Staley, Edgcumbe: The dogaressas of Venice : The wives of the doges. London : T. W. Laurie]</ref>

This unusual lack of publicly recorded information is likely because his dukedom was relatively unremarkable in terms of conquests, expansion, and events of significance — historians of the Republic would have had little interest in "digging up the past" either to glorify or to marr his legacy. He was married to a woman named Sophia, according to legend a captive from the East.<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/dogaressasofveni00stal#page/316/mode/2up Staley, Edgcumbe: The dogaressas of Venice : The wives of the doges. London : T. W. Laurie]</ref>
⚫
The Morosini had been raised to countship in the late 10th century [[Common Era|CE]] after they, with the support of [[Holy Roman Emperor]] [[Otto II]], had vanquished the rival Caloprini family.<ref>John the Deacon. ''Cronaca veneziana''. Edited by Giovanni Monticolo, pp. 57-171. Rome: Forzani e C. Tipografi del Senato, 1890.</ref>


⚫
The Morosini had been raised to countship in the late 10th century [[Common Era|C.E.]] after they, with the support of [[Holy Roman Emperor]] [[Otto II]], had vanquished the rival Caloprini family.<ref>John the Deacon. ''Cronaca veneziana''. Edited by Giovanni Monticolo, pp. 57-171. Rome: Forzani e C. Tipografi del Senato, 1890.</ref> <br />
Domenico brought the family to the forefront of Venetian political life, starting a tradition that would see his successors contribute greatly to the wellbeing of the Republic.
Domenico brought the family to the forefront of Venetian political life, starting a tradition that would see his successors contribute greatly to the wellbeing of the Republic.
[[Ruggiero Morosini]] would be admiral of the Venetian navy that defeated the [[Republic of Genoa|Genoese]] in 1298, while [[Francesco Morosini]] would defeat the Turks on several occasions, somewhat slowing down the westward progress of the Ottoman Empire in the process.<ref>[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/392731/Morosini-family "Morosini Family." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online], accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>
[[Ruggiero Morosini]] would be admiral of the Venetian navy that defeated the [[Republic of Genoa|Genoese]] in 1298, while [[Francesco Morosini]] would defeat the Turks on several occasions, somewhat slowing down the westward progress of the Ottoman Empire in the process.<ref>[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/392731/Morosini-family "Morosini Family." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online], accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>


==Public office==
==Public office==
Morosini took office at a time when relations between Venice and two of its long-time allies, [[Byzantine Greece]] and the [[Normans]], were beginning to deteriorate.<ref>De Canal, Martin. ''Les Estoires de Venise: Cronaca veneziana in lingua francese dalle origini al 1275''. Edited by Alberto Limentani, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1972.</ref>
Morosini took office at a time when relations between Venice and two of its long-time allies, [[Byzantine Greece]] and the [[Normans]], were beginning to deteriorate.<ref>De Canal, Martin. ''Les Estoires de Venise: Cronaca veneziana in lingua francese dalle origini al 1275''. Edited by Alberto Limentani, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1972.</ref> After the death of his father, emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]], in 1118, [[John II Komnenos]] refused to confirm the 1082 treaty<ref>Borsari, Silvano. ''"Il crisobullo di Alessio I per Venezia."'' Annali dell'Istituto Italiano per gli studi storici 2 (1970), pages 111-131.</ref> (a [[Golden Bull|chrysobull]]) with the Republic, which had given it unique and generous trading rights within the Byzantine Empire (there would be no import duties on Venetian shipments to and from the territories of the Empire).<ref>''Trattati con Bisanzio, 992-1198, I''. Edited by Marco Pozza and Giorgio Ravegnani. Venice: Il Cardo, 1993.</ref> An incident involving the abuse of a member of the imperial family by Venetians led to a dangerous conflict, especially as Byzantium had depended on Venice for its naval strength.<ref>John Julius Norwich, A short history of Byzantium, Penguin, 1998, page 70.</ref><br />

After the death of his father, emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]], in 1118, [[John II Komnenos]] refused to confirm the 1082 treaty<ref>Borsari, Silvano. ''"Il crisobullo di Alessio I per Venezia."'' Annali dell'Istituto Italiano per gli studi storici 2 (1970), pages 111-31.</ref> (a [[Golden Bull|chrysobull]]) with the Republic, which had given it unique and generous trading rights within the Byzantine Empire (there would be no import duties on Venetian shipments to and from the territories of the Empire).<ref>''Trattati con Bisanzio, 992-1198, I''. Edited by Marco Pozza and Giorgio Ravegnani. Venice: Il Cardo, 1993.</ref> An incident involving the abuse of a member of the imperial family by Venetians led to a dangerous conflict, especially as Byzantium had depended on Venice for its naval strength.<ref>John Julius Norwich, A short history of Byzantium, Penguin, 1998, page 70.</ref><br />
After a Byzantine retaliatory attack on [[Kerkyra]], John II exiled the Venetian merchants from [[Constantinople]], but this produced further retaliation, and a Venetian fleet of 72 ships plundered [[Rhodes]], [[Chios]], [[Samos]], [[Lesbos]], [[Andros]] and captured [[Kefalonia]] in the [[Ionian Sea]].
After a Byzantine retaliatory attack on [[Kerkyra]], John II exiled the Venetian merchants from [[Constantinople]], but this produced further retaliation, and a Venetian fleet of 72 ships plundered [[Rhodes]], [[Chios]], [[Samos]], [[Lesbos]], [[Andros]] and captured [[Kefalonia]] in the [[Ionian Sea]].


Relationships with the Normans deteriorated when Venice supported (through its fleet under Naimero and Giovanni Polani, sons of Morosini's predecessor [[Pietro Polani]]) a Byzantine intervention to suppress an uprising at Cape Malea (one of the [[peninsulas]] in the southeast of the [[Peloponnese]] in [[Greece]]) in 1149.<ref>[http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/articles/dotson1.htm Dotson, John E. "Foundations of Venetian Naval Strategy from Pietro II Orseolo to the Battle of Zonchio." Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies], accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>
Relationships with the Normans deteriorated when Venice supported (through its fleet under Naimero and Giovanni Polani, sons of Morosini's predecessor [[Pietro Polani]]) a Byzantine intervention to suppress an uprising at Cape Malea (one of the [[peninsulas]] in the southeast of the [[Peloponnese]] in [[Greece]]) in 1149.<ref>[http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/articles/dotson1.htm Dotson, John E. "Foundations of Venetian Naval Strategy from Pietro II Orseolo to the Battle of Zonchio." Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070312093110/http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/articles/dotson1.htm |date=2007-03-12}}, accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>


The 1148 conquest of the [[Istria County|Istrian]] city of [[Pula]], a key port in the peninsula, was followed by an insurgence which Morosini suppressed with atypical shrewdness: in 1150, reconquered Pula swore allegiance to the Republic of Venice, thus becoming a Venetian possession. For centuries thereafter, the city's fate and fortunes would be tied to those of Venetian power.
The 1148 conquest of the [[Istria County|Istrian]] city of [[Pula]], a key port in the peninsula, was followed by an insurgence which Morosini suppressed with atypical shrewdness: in 1150, reconquered Pula swore fealty to the Republic of Venice, thus becoming a Venetian possession. For centuries thereafter, the city's fate and fortunes would be tied to those of Venetian power.


Morosini's foreign policy sought a rapprochement with the [[Holy See]], which had excommunicated the city of Venice because of its familiarity with the Byzantine Empire (and, thus, its schismatic religion).<br />
Morosini's foreign policy sought a rapprochement with the [[Holy See]], which had excommunicated the city of Venice because of its familiarity with the Byzantine Empire (and, thus, its schismatic religion). The doge extended an olive branch to [[Pope Eugene III]] by consenting, in 1152, to the independence of the Church within the territories of the Republic — a move that immediately warranted the repeal of the excommunication and thus simplified Venetian tradings with Catholic countries.<ref>Boso: ''Vitae paparum''. In ''Le liber pontificalis'', edited by L. Duchesne, 2:351-446. Paris: E. Thorin, 1886-92 and E. de Boccard, 1955.</ref> <br />
⚫
Further recognition of renewed collaboration came in 1154, when [[Pope Anastasius IV]] raised the doge ''dominator Marchiæ'' (lit. "ruler of [[Marche]]").<ref>Jansen, P. (2005). Echec et réussite d’une métropolisation en Italie à la fin du Moyen-Age: étude comparée des cas ligure et marchésan.</ref>
The doge extended an olive branch to [[Pope Eugene III]] by consenting, in 1152, to the independence of the Church within the territories of the Republic — a move that immediately warranted the repeal of the excommunication and, thus, simplified Venetian tradings with Catholic countries.<ref>Boso: ''Vitae paparum''. In ''Le liber pontificalis'', edited by L. Duchesne, 2:351-446. Paris: E. Thorin, 1886-92 and E. de Boccard, 1955.</ref> <br />
⚫
Further recognition of renewed collaboration came in 1554, when [[Pope Anastasius IV]] raised the doge ''dominator Marchiæ'' (lit., "ruler of [[Marche]]").<ref>Jansen, P. (2005). Echec et réussite d’une métropolisation en Italie à la fin du Moyen-Age: étude comparée des cas ligure et marchésan.</ref>


Morosini's reconciliation with the Church had positive effects on domestic policy as well, by bridging a long-standing feud between the Polani and Dandolo patrician families.
Morosini's reconciliation with the Church had positive effects on domestic policy as well, by bridging a long-standing feud between the Polani and Dandolo patrician families.
[[Enrico Dandolo (patriarch)|Enrico Dandolo]] had been [[Patriarch of Grado]] at a particularly tense time between Venice and the pontificate, which had caused the Polani family, strong supporters of the Pope, to break relations with the Dandolos. In an attempt to reconcile the factions that had coalesced around the two families among the patricians, Morosini pushed for a ''mariage d'affaires'' between Andrea Dandolo, grandson of Enrico, and Primera Polani, niece of the previous doge.<ref>Madden, Thomas F. ''Enrico Dandolo and the Rise of Venice.'' New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.</ref>
[[Enrico Dandolo (patriarch)|Enrico Dandolo]] had been [[Patriarch of Grado]] at a particularly tense time between Venice and the pontificate, which had caused the Polani family, strong supporters of the Pope, to break relations with the Dandolos. In an attempt to reconcile the factions that had coalesced around the two families among the patricians, Morosini pushed for a ''mariage d'affaires'' between Andrea Dandolo, grandson of Enrico, and Primera Polani, niece of the previous doge.<ref>Madden, Thomas F. ''Enrico Dandolo and the Rise of Venice.'' New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.</ref>


During Morosini's dukedom, construction of [[St Mark's Campanile]] was finally completed.<ref>[http://www.korcula.net/history/mmarelic/historyvenice.htm Marelic, Marko. ''A history of Venice''. Apr. 2008], accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>
During Morosini's dogeship, the construction of [[St Mark's Campanile]] was finally completed.<ref>[http://www.korcula.net/history/mmarelic/historyvenice.htm Marelic, Marko. ''A history of Venice''. Apr. 2008] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190129160754/http://www.korcula.net/history/mmarelic/historyvenice.htm |date=2019-01-29 }}, accessed January 20, 2009.</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 63: Line 82:
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Morosini, Domenico}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Morosini, Domenico}}
[[Category:Counts of Italy]]
[[Category:Counts in Italy]]
[[Category:Doges of Venice]]
[[Category:1156 deaths]]
[[Category:1156 deaths]]
[[Category:12th-century Italian people]]
[[Category:House of Morosini|Domenico]]
[[Category:House of Morosini]]
[[Category:12th-century Doges of Venice]]
[[Category:12th-century Doges of Venice]]
[[Category:Year of birth unknown]]
[[Category:Year of birth unknown]]

Latest revision as of 15:51, 22 August 2023

Domenico Morosini
Doge of Venice
In office
1148–1156
Personal details
BornUnknown
Died1156
Coat of arms of the Morosini family

Domenico Morosini (died February 1156) was the thirty-seventh doge of the Republic of Venice, reigning from 1148 until his death in 1156.

Descendant of a noble family (he was a count), Morosini succeeded in reconciling the two factions that had divided Venetian patrician families for years, thus ending a political conflict that had also caused the Republic to lose ground in its territories and primacy in its commercial activities. Quite unexceptional otherwise, Morosini's dogeship was marked by renewed prosperity and reconciliation.

Private life

[edit]

Morosini's early years are difficult to reconstruct, due to the absence of reliable records and sources. As a matter of fact, his birthyear is unknown, as are the activities and connections of his family before his interest in politics.[1] This unusual lack of publicly recorded information is likely because his dukedom was relatively unremarkable in terms of conquests, expansion, and events of significance — historians of the Republic would have had little interest in "digging up the past" either to glorify or to mar his legacy. He was married to a woman named Sophia, who was according to legend a captive from the East.[2]

The Morosini had been raised to countship in the late 10th century CE after they, with the support of Holy Roman Emperor Otto II, had vanquished the rival Caloprini family.[3]

Domenico brought the family to the forefront of Venetian political life, starting a tradition that would see his successors contribute greatly to the wellbeing of the Republic. Ruggiero Morosini would be admiral of the Venetian navy that defeated the Genoese in 1298, while Francesco Morosini would defeat the Turks on several occasions, somewhat slowing down the westward progress of the Ottoman Empire in the process.[4]

Public office

[edit]

Morosini took office at a time when relations between Venice and two of its long-time allies, Byzantine Greece and the Normans, were beginning to deteriorate.[5] After the death of his father, emperor Alexios I Komnenos, in 1118, John II Komnenos refused to confirm the 1082 treaty[6] (a chrysobull) with the Republic, which had given it unique and generous trading rights within the Byzantine Empire (there would be no import duties on Venetian shipments to and from the territories of the Empire).[7] An incident involving the abuse of a member of the imperial family by Venetians led to a dangerous conflict, especially as Byzantium had depended on Venice for its naval strength.[8]
After a Byzantine retaliatory attack on Kerkyra, John II exiled the Venetian merchants from Constantinople, but this produced further retaliation, and a Venetian fleet of 72 ships plundered Rhodes, Chios, Samos, Lesbos, Andros and captured Kefalonia in the Ionian Sea.

Relationships with the Normans deteriorated when Venice supported (through its fleet under Naimero and Giovanni Polani, sons of Morosini's predecessor Pietro Polani) a Byzantine intervention to suppress an uprising at Cape Malea (one of the peninsulas in the southeast of the Peloponnese in Greece) in 1149.[9]

The 1148 conquest of the Istrian city of Pula, a key port in the peninsula, was followed by an insurgence which Morosini suppressed with atypical shrewdness: in 1150, reconquered Pula swore fealty to the Republic of Venice, thus becoming a Venetian possession. For centuries thereafter, the city's fate and fortunes would be tied to those of Venetian power.

Morosini's foreign policy sought a rapprochement with the Holy See, which had excommunicated the city of Venice because of its familiarity with the Byzantine Empire (and, thus, its schismatic religion). The doge extended an olive branch to Pope Eugene III by consenting, in 1152, to the independence of the Church within the territories of the Republic — a move that immediately warranted the repeal of the excommunication and thus simplified Venetian tradings with Catholic countries.[10]
Further recognition of renewed collaboration came in 1154, when Pope Anastasius IV raised the doge dominator Marchiæ (lit. "ruler of Marche").[11]

Morosini's reconciliation with the Church had positive effects on domestic policy as well, by bridging a long-standing feud between the Polani and Dandolo patrician families. Enrico Dandolo had been Patriarch of Grado at a particularly tense time between Venice and the pontificate, which had caused the Polani family, strong supporters of the Pope, to break relations with the Dandolos. In an attempt to reconcile the factions that had coalesced around the two families among the patricians, Morosini pushed for a mariage d'affaires between Andrea Dandolo, grandson of Enrico, and Primera Polani, niece of the previous doge.[12]

During Morosini's dogeship, the construction of St Mark's Campanile was finally completed.[13]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Historia ducum venetiorum, edited by H. Simonsfeld, Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Scriptores, 14: 72-89.
  2. ^ Staley, Edgcumbe: The dogaressas of Venice : The wives of the doges. London : T. W. Laurie
  3. ^ John the Deacon. Cronaca veneziana. Edited by Giovanni Monticolo, pp. 57-171. Rome: Forzani e C. Tipografi del Senato, 1890.
  4. ^ "Morosini Family." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online, accessed January 20, 2009.
  5. ^ De Canal, Martin. Les Estoires de Venise: Cronaca veneziana in lingua francese dalle origini al 1275. Edited by Alberto Limentani, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1972.
  6. ^ Borsari, Silvano. "Il crisobullo di Alessio I per Venezia." Annali dell'Istituto Italiano per gli studi storici 2 (1970), pages 111-131.
  7. ^ Trattati con Bisanzio, 992-1198, I. Edited by Marco Pozza and Giorgio Ravegnani. Venice: Il Cardo, 1993.
  8. ^ John Julius Norwich, A short history of Byzantium, Penguin, 1998, page 70.
  9. ^ Dotson, John E. "Foundations of Venetian Naval Strategy from Pietro II Orseolo to the Battle of Zonchio." Viator: Medieval and Renaissance Studies Archived 2007-03-12 at the Wayback Machine, accessed January 20, 2009.
  10. ^ Boso: Vitae paparum. In Le liber pontificalis, edited by L. Duchesne, 2:351-446. Paris: E. Thorin, 1886-92 and E. de Boccard, 1955.
  11. ^ Jansen, P. (2005). Echec et réussite d’une métropolisation en Italie à la fin du Moyen-Age: étude comparée des cas ligure et marchésan.
  12. ^ Madden, Thomas F. Enrico Dandolo and the Rise of Venice. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006.
  13. ^ Marelic, Marko. A history of Venice. Apr. 2008 Archived 2019-01-29 at the Wayback Machine, accessed January 20, 2009.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Barbaro, Marco. Famiglie nobili venete. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Vienna, Coll: Fondo ex Foscarini, codex 6155-56.
  • Bouwsma, W.J. (1972). De bene instituta re publica. Speculum 47, 540-541.
  • Cozzi, G. (1970). Domenico Morosini e il “De bene instituta re publica”,“. Studi veneziani 12, 405—458.
  • del Piazzo, M. (1960). Signoria, Dieci di Balìa, Otto di Pratica: Legazioni e Commissarie, missive e responsive (Roma: Ministero dell'interno, Ufficio centrale degli archivi di Stato).
  • Jansen, P. (2005). Echec et réussite d’une métropolisation en Italie à la fin du Moyen-Age: étude comparée des cas ligure et marchésan.
  • Kohl, B.G. (1993). Venice, A Documentary History, 1450-1630. Sixteenth Century Journal 24, 998-999.
  • Law, J.E. (1992). The Venetian Mainland State in the Fifteenth Century. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 2, 153-174.
  • Mallett, M. (1972). De bene instituta re publica. The English Historical Review 87, 404.
  • McGinn, B. (1986). Circoli gioachimiti veneziani(1450–1530). Cristianesimo nella Storia. Ricerche Storiche Esegetiche Teologiche Bologna 7, 19-39.
  • Molmenti, P. (1880). La storia di Venezia nella vita privata dalle origini alla caduta della repubblica (Roux e Favale).
  • Morosini, D. (1865). Lettere del conte... al signor abate Francesco Cancellieri di Roma e di questo a quello intorno ad alcune cifre spettanti all'Accademia de'Lincei e per la seconda volta pubblicate. (Ceneda, G. Longo).
  • Sanudo, M. il giovane (1989/2001). Le Vite dei Dogi (Padova: Antenore).
  • Stivieri, N. (1870). Storia di Venezia: dalla sua origine fino ai giorni nostri ([Stab. di] C. Coen).
Government offices
Preceded by Doge of Venice
1148–1156 		Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domenico_Morosini&oldid=1171675459"