Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplekita: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:42, 9 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplekita

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and no particularly strong evidence of reliable source coverage to get them over WP:GNG: of the three sources here, one is the band's own self-penned PR bio on CBC Music's "bands get to repost their own PR bios" section; one is a 100-word blurb wrapped around an embedded YouTube performance video; and one is an album review on a music website (Blurt) that might be an acceptable reliable source if the rest of the sourcing around it were better, but cannot carry WP:GNG in and of itself as the article's only acceptable source. (And no, for the record, the existence of the CBC Music profile does not in and of itself constitute proof that they've gotten over NMUSIC #11 by getting playlisted on the CBC -- that section's open to any Canadian band at all that wants to make a song or two available for streaming, regardless of whether R2 or R3 has put them into rotation or not.) All of which means nothing here is substantive enough, or sourced well enough, to pass our notability standards for bands. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, thanks for the good analysis. Legacypac (talk) - 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete as none of this suggests a better notable article for the applicable notability, not yet better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 08:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 ===[[Duplekita]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
 :{{la|Duplekita}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duplekita|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 February 23#{{anchorencode:Duplekita}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Duplekita Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 7: / Line 13: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 04:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Canada|list of Canada-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 04:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Delete''' per nom, thanks for the good analysis.  04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom, thanks for the good analysis. Legacypac (talk) - 04:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' as none of this suggests a better notable article for the applicable notability, not yet better convincing. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">SwisterTwister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 05:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>