Wikipedia:WikiProject Egypt/Assessment: Difference between revisions
(19 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Instructions == |
== Instructions == |
||
===Quality assessment=== |
===Quality assessment=== |
||
{{Assessment Class Summary |
|||
An article's quality assessment is generated from the '''class''' parameter in the {{tl|WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: |
|||
|banner=WikiProject Egypt |
|||
|topic=Egypt |
|||
; <code><nowiki>{{WikiProject Egypt | class=??? | ... }}</nowiki></code> |
|||
⚫ | |||
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in [[:Category:Unassessed Egypt articles]]. The class should be assigned according to the [[#Quality scale|quality scale]] below. |
|||
After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to a /Comments subpage, which will appear as a link on the project banner's template. Adding comments to a subpage will add the article's talk page to [[:Category:Egypt articles with comments]], and will be transcluded onto the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Egypt articles by quality|automatically generated work list]] pages in the Comments column. |
|||
===Quality scale=== |
===Quality scale=== |
||
Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
=== Importance assessment === |
=== Importance assessment === |
||
{{Assessment Importance Summary |
|||
An article's importance assessment is generated from the ''importance'' parameter in the {{tl|WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: |
|||
|banner=WikiProject Egypt |
|||
|topic=Egypt |
|||
; <nowiki>{{WikiProject Egypt| ... | importance=??? | ...}}</nowiki> |
|||
}} |
|||
{| border="0" align="right" |
|||
|- |
|||
| width=40px {{Top-Importance}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{High-Importance}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{Mid-Importance}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| {{Low-Importance}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="color:black; text-align:center; background:#FAEBD7;" | '''???''' |
|||
⚫ | |||
The following values may be used for importance assessments: |
|||
* '''Top''' - The article is about one of the core topics of Egypt. Adds articles to [[:Category:Top-importance Egypt articles]] |
|||
* '''High''' - The article is about the most well-known or culturally or historically significant aspects of Egypt. Adds articles to [[:Category:High-importance Egypt articles]] |
|||
* '''Mid''' - The article is about a topic within the Egypt field that may or may not be commonly known outside the Egypt community. Adds articles to [[:Category:Mid-importance Egypt articles]] |
|||
* '''Low''' - The article is about a topic that is highly specialized within the Egypt field and is not generally common knowledge outside the community. Adds articles to [[:Category:Low-importance Egypt articles]] |
|||
* '''Unknown''' - Any article which has not yet been assessed on the importance scale is automatically added to the [[:Category:Unknown-importance Egypt articles]]. |
|||
=== Importance scale === |
=== Importance scale === |
||
Line 94: | Line 73: | ||
| |
| |
||
| |
| |
||
| [[2011 Egyptian revolution]] |
|||
| [[Giza]] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! {{Mid-importance}} |
! {{Mid-importance}} |
||
Line 112: | Line 91: | ||
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. |
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. |
||
====[http://www.assesstm.com/ Assess Talent Management]==== |
|||
<!-- Add your assessment request here --> |
|||
Assess Talent Management - Egypt's No. 1 Personality Assessment, Ability Assessment and Psychometric Testing Software Company and the smartest choice for HR and OD Managers in the Middle East. |
|||
====[[Removal of Mohamed Morsi from office]]==== |
|||
I have rewritten most of the article. Nominating it for Good Article status. [[User:Zakawer|Zakawer]] ([[User talk:Zakawer|talk]]) 12:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Vodafone Egypt]]==== |
|||
The entire article was rewritten. The speechmark is also correctly used.It deserves reassessment. Many thanks. |
|||
====[[Ambassador MK III Missile Boat]]==== |
|||
I have developed this article from a stub and added new refrences. I think it deserves reassessment. Thank you. |
|||
====[[Badr al-Jamali]]==== |
|||
Wrote the article from scratch. Isn't much though. More is in the citations. Assess. Contribute. Thanks. :-) |
|||
====[[Thanaweya Amma]]==== |
|||
I significantly expanded this article from a stub. Please reassess. It needs more Arabic sources. Thanks. |
|||
====[[Eastern Desert]]==== |
|||
I have developed this article from a stub with new references. Please assess it, thank you [[User:Rmeares01|Rmeares01]] ([[User talk:Rmeares01|talk]]) 00:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Gihan Sami Soliman]]=== |
===[[Gihan Sami Soliman]]=== |
||
Education in Egypt and reform by community leaders and educators. I have added external links and reference as evidence of notability ..Please note the corruption in the past regime that was suppressing reform attempts specially by community leaders and scarcity of information and research on the topic.. please check.. thank you |
Education in Egypt and reform by community leaders and educators. I have added external links and reference as evidence of notability ..Please note the corruption in the past regime that was suppressing reform attempts specially by community leaders and scarcity of information and research on the topic.. please check.. thank you |
||
Line 222: | Line 221: | ||
--[[User:Diaa abdelmoneim|Diaa abdelmoneim]] ([[User talk:Diaa abdelmoneim|talk]]) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
--[[User:Diaa abdelmoneim|Diaa abdelmoneim]] ([[User talk:Diaa abdelmoneim|talk]]) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Popular pages == |
|||
'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Egypt/Popular pages|Popular pages]]''': A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. |
|||
== Assessment log == |
== Assessment log == |
||
Line 237: | Line 239: | ||
[[Category:Egypt articles by quality]] |
[[Category:Egypt articles by quality]] |
||
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:مشروع ويكي مصر/دليل التقديرات]] |
|||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 00:18, 21 May 2021
Welcome to the assessment department of the Egypt WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Egypt related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed into the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Egypt articles by quality and Category:Egypt articles by importance, which serve as the foundations for an automatically generated worklist. Frequently asked questions[edit]
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department. Instructions[edit]Quality assessment[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale[edit]
Importance assessment[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Egypt|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Importance scale[edit]
Requesting an assessment[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Assess Talent Management - Egypt's No. 1 Personality Assessment, Ability Assessment and Psychometric Testing Software Company and the smartest choice for HR and OD Managers in the Middle East. I have rewritten most of the article. Nominating it for Good Article status. Zakawer (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC) The entire article was rewritten. The speechmark is also correctly used.It deserves reassessment. Many thanks. I have developed this article from a stub and added new refrences. I think it deserves reassessment. Thank you. Wrote the article from scratch. Isn't much though. More is in the citations. Assess. Contribute. Thanks. :-) I significantly expanded this article from a stub. Please reassess. It needs more Arabic sources. Thanks. I have developed this article from a stub with new references. Please assess it, thank you Rmeares01 (talk) 00:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Education in Egypt and reform by community leaders and educators. I have added external links and reference as evidence of notability ..Please note the corruption in the past regime that was suppressing reform attempts specially by community leaders and scarcity of information and research on the topic.. please check.. thank you Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Hi. Please take a look at my article "niqab in Egypt" I have made a lot of changes and it is nominated for good article status and would love your feedback. Noosaelgamoosa (talk) 05:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)noosaelgamoosa I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. MontyofEgypt 18:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have expanded a small, stub article into a longer one. DCI2026 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC) Operation Badr (1973) - complete re-write of the article after moving it (previously called: The Crossing); you can see the difference between the present article and the old one here. With a proper ending I think this article can reach GA-class. Sherif9282 (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Comments by --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Generally our assessment is for a maximum of B-class. Please do a peer review before nominating for GA
Ask for a peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review to get a review of more then one user.
Done. I corrected a few refs that I spotted myself. I don't suppose there are any more mistakes. Note: I assumed it was Cairo Local Time (since Shazly and Gamasy give the time, and they are Egyptians), but I will check it soon. Anything else with the article? --Sherif9282 (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Tamara Siuda -- Significant changes have been made in the past month or so, including layout, content, and the addition of a variety of references. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Kemetic Orthodoxy -- Complete re-write took place over the past few months, including layout, content, and references. Article is now more than four times the original size, and layout is largely based on that of other religion pages. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC) It's better but:
--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Popular pages[edit]Popular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. Assessment log[edit]
August 19, 2024[edit]Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
Removed[edit]
August 18, 2024[edit]Reassessed[edit]
August 17, 2024[edit]Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
August 16, 2024[edit]Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
Removed[edit]
August 15, 2024[edit]Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
Removed[edit]
August 14, 2024[edit]Renamed[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
Removed[edit]
August 13, 2024[edit]Renamed[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
Assessed[edit]
Removed[edit]
|