Jump to content

Trading Places: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 October 2024

9 October 2024

6 October 2024

17 September 2024

13 September 2024

31 August 2024

26 July 2024

23 July 2024

19 July 2024

30 June 2024

18 May 2024

16 May 2024

15 May 2024

14 May 2024

  • curprev 12:2412:24, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 132,192 bytes −21 Critical response: Corrected errant reference to "financial system" as insider trading is not part of this system. Also removed laughable modern reference to "dismantling the financial system" two protagonists in one comedy are unlikely to dismantle any system. Indeed no individuals can ever "dismantle" any system. They can however expose and possibly influence or shape it. Does the contributor honestly believe that anyone ever expected a story arc where Winthrope and Valentine stir up so... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:1612:16, 14 May 2024 DoebLoggs talk contribs m 132,213 bytes −46 Reverted edits by 82.71.8.175 (talk) to last version by Darkwarriorblake undo Tag: Rollback
  • curprev 12:1512:15, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 132,259 bytes +44 Critical response: Incorrect reference to "financial system" corrected. The article does not refer to the financial system. Clearly the system appeared to function correctly in the movie, the corruption was the insider trading based on espionage. None of that is, or has ever been part a designed part of the "financial system". It could be described as a vulnerability of the system, but that's no different to how armed bank robbery is part of the financial system undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:0712:07, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 132,215 bytes +2 Critical response: Incorrect paraphrase from the citation, corrected with the verbatim. Only an idiot would assert that "money isn't important". It is extremely important to the vast majority of people on the planet. Even if they are content with their wealth or income they would concede that their lives would be drastically affected if they suffered new or worsened financial hardships undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 12:0012:00, 14 May 2024 Darkwarriorblake talk contribs 132,213 bytes +448 Restored revision 1223781357 by Darkwarriorblake (talk): This is a featured article, use the talk page to justify readding these substantial changes based on your own opinion when the content is sourced in the article undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
  • curprev 11:5811:58, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 131,765 bytes +14 Plot: In correct refence to 'street smarts'. The whole movie is about nature, nurture and it unfolds that nurture is the winner, for these protagonists. This reference to street smarts is probably confusion regarding Valentine's application of human psychology to the prediction of trader behaviour undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:5311:53, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 131,751 bytes −13 Plot: Removed ideologically charged reference which attempts to assert a far broader set of hierarchies than treated in the movie undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:4811:48, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 131,764 bytes −93 Removed redundant hyperbole, every film has been reassessed, and always will. Every film receives positive and negative reviews. If there is a relevant review from time of release, based on the society it was created for (as a beautiful, diverse work of social satire for the time) then it must be supported by citation undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:4411:44, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 131,857 bytes −84 Irrelevant revisionist commentary removed. If a political point is to be made of this masterpiece of diversity then it must be supported by citation undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 11:4011:40, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 131,941 bytes −272 Irrelevant and incorrect reference to a sub-genre of romantic comedy. The two main protagonists have no romantic relationship. If this is deemed relevant it must be supported by citation. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 09:2809:28, 14 May 2024 Darkwarriorblake talk contribs 132,213 bytes −84 No edit summary undo Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 00:2300:23, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 132,297 bytes 0 Plot: Case sensitive? undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 00:1500:15, 14 May 2024 82.71.8.175 talk 132,297 bytes +79 Plot: It can't be coincidence that they were Long Squeezed on Orange Juice. A very humourous film with a very humourous ending. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 May 2024

4 May 2024

1 May 2024

24 April 2024

14 April 2024

11 April 2024

26 March 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)