User talk:Robert Moore/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Robert Moore. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
August 2020
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please note that unresponsive editing and ignoring community input can be pretty disruptive. You are expected to join the discussion or at very least listen to other users' complaints. Persistent disruptive editing can lead to a block from editing; perhaps simply without warning to prevent further disruption, since warnings do not appear to have an effect. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)A detailed discussion and block reasoning can be found at Special:Diff/973872777/973877358. You had been invited to the discussion; you had been warned about the possible consequence of continuing to ignore the community's input; you continued to do exactly what you had been warned about. A conditional unblock may be an option in the future, but there are a few open questions if you request an unblock: Why did you do this, how has the situation changed, and why should we believe that it has? I'm not entirely sure what can be done here. Perhaps the standard offer can be a guidance, but this has been an issue for almost 10 years. The usual "six months" are just five percent of the duration of the behavior that led to the block. I'm not sure if this persistent attitude can genuinely change in such a relatively short amount of time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
I would like to make a appeal to be reinstated. I understand that I don’t respond to requests from others but I get nervous when people offer criticism of my edits. Thanks.Robert Moore (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Robert Moore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
‘’Apologize for excessive editing and not responding to action or explanation
Decline reason:
You do not respond to the questions above posed by ToBeFree. You need to be willing and able to communicate with other users and respect the input of the community when given. If you are unable to do these things, you can't be unblocked. If you can, you will need to explain what is different this time as opposed to past times you have been asked to do this. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Guess I’ll start moving articles that I can’t use on this site over to my Wikia sites.Robert Moore (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Robert Moore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I read the statement as to why I was blocked in the first place. I understand how reckless my edits have been and not participating with the administration or users without giving a reason why I did it without any thought or permission. I want to have a full conversation with the community and respect their wishes, be mindful of my actions, and to be active on this community. I’m ready to communicate and stop ignoring, therefore I am willing to accept a unconditional unblock if accepted.
Decline reason:
I am not assured by the discussion below that the user clearly understands the issues and can edit productively based on feedback. The way that things need to be explained and re-explained concerns me. only (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You're still not answering the questions. Please be specific. How have your edits been reckless? Why haven't you given any reasons why?
- You were warned about using curly quotations and continued to use them? Why?
- You failed to respond to queries including when brought to WP:ANI. Why do you not communicate even when asked a direct question?
- If you intend to work with the community and begin communicating, how will you handle things differently than before?
- Answers to these would be a good first step, but I'm not admin so I don't really have a say in the matter. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I’m sorry. I had to recheck my editing history, so I didn’t see any deletes or any problems. I thought that was a reason for my blocking but I’m trying to figure out what I did wrong. However, I’m willing to answer your remarks.
- I wasn’t aware of the curly quotations until you bought it up. I didn’t know about that and should have paid attention to it.
- Second, I get nervous about responding to people in the community because of how they respond to me, especially when it comes making queries to the administrators, plus when I see several articles that I created being deleted I feel like I’m not wanted here and that hurts me, but I understand as why it had to happen.
- As for working with the community, I give you my promise that what I did in the past will never happen again and I am willing to take any advice or criticism. I am ready to be a better person and stop being rouge. Robert Moore (talk) 18:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies for butting in- but I'd just like to ask about #1 above: How was Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars's mention of MOS:CURLY the first you've heard about this? I specifically warned you above on this talk page multiple times. That was the main problem on All That (season 11), which I had to fix many of them. Apart from the CURLY problems, there were other issues ToBeFree mentioned that you continued to do, even with other users attempting to tell you not to do it on this talk page (Again, see here). Magitroopa (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Now I understand what everyone was trying to tell me. For one, I haven’t paid attention to my talk page in a while until I receive the blockage. Plus I want to talk to ToBeFree and any person like you about not doing anything like this again, but since I’m still blocked and can’t make responses to your talk page or administrative this will probably be the only area I can post my response until then. Like I said earlier, I had no problems with the other Wikia sites I belong to so far.Robert Moore (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- (I'm regularly having a look at this page and can be directly notified of messages using the code
{{ping|ToBeFree}} ~~~~. Per WP:ADMINACCT, "editors are free to question or to criticize administrator actions", and I am "expected to respond promptly and civilly to queries about [my] Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions". For chronological order and thread readability, I'm moving the "Decline" and the response to it below.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- (I'm regularly having a look at this page and can be directly notified of messages using the code
- Now I understand what everyone was trying to tell me. For one, I haven’t paid attention to my talk page in a while until I receive the blockage. Plus I want to talk to ToBeFree and any person like you about not doing anything like this again, but since I’m still blocked and can’t make responses to your talk page or administrative this will probably be the only area I can post my response until then. Like I said earlier, I had no problems with the other Wikia sites I belong to so far.Robert Moore (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies for butting in- but I'd just like to ask about #1 above: How was Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars's mention of MOS:CURLY the first you've heard about this? I specifically warned you above on this talk page multiple times. That was the main problem on All That (season 11), which I had to fix many of them. Apart from the CURLY problems, there were other issues ToBeFree mentioned that you continued to do, even with other users attempting to tell you not to do it on this talk page (Again, see here). Magitroopa (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- Decline. Also, can someone block Robert Moore from editing his own talk page? He's becoming annoying. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- how is it that I have become annoying? Just asking since you bought it up.Robert Moore (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't like that you still asked for a unconditional unblock in your last unblock request, because that is not going to happen. I have some concern that you still don't understand what you did wrong. At the very least, you will need to stop the use of curly quotations in articles per MOS:CURLY (which is all you had to do in the first place to avoid all of this) and you MUST pay attention to your notifications. If you get a message from another editor on your talk page with a question or concern, you must stop all other editing and respond to it. You must have resolved any issue with the other editor before continuing to edit again. "I haven’t paid attention to my talk page" is not an acceptable excuse. Those are my suggestions. Others may have more to add. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, you have a point. I read the last messages and realized that I made a lot of mistakes but I’m open to criticism. I’ll stop and refrain from further edits altogether without getting permission, and I will accept any discipline handed down to me.Robert Moore (talk) 03:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
An IP (67.53.214.86) has been recently editing articles Robert Moore typically edits. If it's him, he's certainly screwing himself from ever getting unblocked. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not doing the edits. I just told my friends the reason why I was blocked so they’re just helping me out.Robert Moore (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well this is meatpuppetry and therefore the IP is now blocked. Anyone else editing on your behalf? only (talk) 01:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- no. I’ll let them know.Robert Moore (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- "They" already know because it's you. The style is the exact same between your edits and the IP's at 2020 in radio. You have been evading your block. Binksternet (talk) 02:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- no. I’ll let them know.Robert Moore (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well this is meatpuppetry and therefore the IP is now blocked. Anyone else editing on your behalf? only (talk) 01:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I’m not doing the edits. I just told my friends the reason why I was blocked so they’re just helping me out.Robert Moore (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
I give up. I can’t come up with any reason why I should be unblocked. I don’t have a real answer and it is harder to come up with one. If that’s the case the only way I can think of is either sit out the indefinite block or be removed from Wikipedia altogether. But it was great while it lasted. Thank you.Robert Moore (talk) 02:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
A Message
For anyone who has been updating or editing my pages, I just want to say thanks. Hopefully one day I’ll come back. For now I found other places to occupy my time with, including starting up my personal wikis, so once again thanks.Robert Moore (talk) 00:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Adult hits radio stations in the Philippines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia - Editathon 2021
 |
|
Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 03:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC) by using the Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle/Invitees list.To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please add or remove your name here.
Nomination of Rachel Wallace for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Wallace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
SL93 (talk) 19:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Maryland
Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Maryland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Arkansas
Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Arkansas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of A.S.K. M.E. for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.S.K. M.E. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
– DarkGlow • 20:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Outsiders Inn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Yet another CMT reality show with no reliable sourcing found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
The article 'Til Death Do Us Part (American TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for notability and sources since 2019
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 Seattle meetup
 |
Distant Worlds Coffeehouse. For the address and to RSVP, please click here. |
 |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Oklahoma
Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Oklahoma has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The article I See Me, I.C.U. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Basically an episode recap. Only one RS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Plus None has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Overlong plot summary and the Notes section is basically trivia. Is this particular episode really notable enough to have its own article?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Indiana
Template:Rhythmic Contemporary Radio Stations in Indiana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mlaffs (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
The article Jenna Drey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I think she fails notability standards established in WP:SINGER and WP:COMPOSER.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Greater Milwaukee Auto Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
When excluding results from media sponsor the Journal Sentinel, additional research does not reveal sufficient approporiate sourcing for the subject to clear GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
March 2023 Seattle meetup
|
In the Seattle area? We are resuming Seattle monthly meetups on Tuesday, March 21, 2022, 5:45pm to 7:45pm at the
Distant Worlds Coffeehouseas they have resumed their normal operating hours at their new location. For the address and to RSVP, please click here. |
|
The article List of Ugly Betty cast members has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
the page is entirely redundant since all information is already included on the pages for Ugly Betty, its seperate seasons and the “List of Ugly Betty Characters” page; it does not add a single thing to the information already mentioned there. In addition, the page is extremely incomplete as it does omits an entire seasons and seemingly random cast members have been selected or omitted from the mentioned seasons.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of 'Til Death Do Us Part (American TV series) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Til Death Do Us Part (American TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 12:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of The City (XM) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The City (XM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Let'srun (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Be Ugly for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be Ugly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § Category:Pregnancy-themed television shows
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 18 § Category:Pregnancy-themed television shows on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article The Move (XM) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject lacks any sources to meet the GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The article WJJJ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sources, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The article KHMG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Virtually no content, no sources to meet WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of KHMG for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KHMG until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Venus (SiriusXM) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venus (SiriusXM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
The article KHLU-CD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject does not meet the GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of KUAM-LP for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KUAM-LP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Wavey for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 18:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
The article KALO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject lacks the coverage needed to meet the WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Sheleen Thomas for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheleen Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.