The Dutch section of this article is untrue. "Laze" is not a word in Dutch. The real singular past subjunctive of the verb "Lezen" (to read) is "las", which therefore doesn't belong on this article. I rarely edit on wiki's but I suggest a removal of that part of the entry is in place here. My source is the fact that I'm a native Dutch speaker and I would cite a dictionary to support the information. Aleneen (talk) 17:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- If it's wrong, please correct the conjugation in the entry lezen as well. But the conjugation table says it is an archaic form. Maro 18:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)