Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 8

July 8

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no reason to hardcode this Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Way too soon for this template to exist Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and never used. Since it only ever had one link, there is no need to retain it for historical purposes Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fox (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G7'd. — fox 06:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link that's red Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no clear purpose Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep: cs1|2 keeps /old versions of templates more-or-less as they were used before they were all migrated to the suite of Lua modules that make up Module:Citation/CS1. These /old templates have been useful for historical reference purposes: as something to compare present cs1|2 output against; to settle the arguments that arise from the assertions that the templates "used to do this or that". The /old versions of the templates work with {{cite compare}} to show how the current compares to the /old:
Cite DVD notes comparison
Wikitext {{cite DVD notes|title=Title}}
Live Title (Media notes).
Sandbox Title (Media notes).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:EXISTING/WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 08:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 08:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was G7. Sole author, template unused. czar 07:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, navigates nothing Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 20 July 2017 (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear purpose Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can be deleted. It was used on a set of 63 pages in user space whose content became Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/DNB Epitome 01 etc. Those pages were deleted a while ago. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Anarchyte (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 05:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, bot in question has not been touched since 2015 Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, just combines two templates Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, I see no reason to collapse an image this way Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and deprecated Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per its documentation. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for historical reasons. People are going to want to create it again, and it's useful to know what it was and why it was deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not only that, but it makes references a real pain in the ass to retrieve/verify from in previous versions. See [1] for an example. The TFD messages screws up the display of the error message however. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep, helpful per its documentation. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Headbomb. --Randykitty (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we do get rid of it, we should also get rid of {{cite doi}}, {{ref doi}}, and {{ref pmid}}. Just Sayin' AManWithNoPlan (talk) 21:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused doc page Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, this template has been surpassed by superior records and is no longer needed. Trackinfo (talk) 06:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 20 July 2017 (NAC). Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, only two links anyway Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep, now used in three articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking forward at Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes, there is a template for the cabinet as I will assume there should be for all US President articles. Why was this eliminated from US Grant? Ten Pound Hammer nominated this on reflex for unused templates, but I think we should 1) check the accuracy of the template, 2) find a way to include it back into the appropriate article rather than to destroy it. Trackinfo (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • My mistake. Yes, you're quite correct. There was a dispute about article length about a year and a half ago, and though the table doesn't contribute to the amount of readable prose, and in an effort to reduce the amount of mark up in the article, I made the template. The dispute was resolved and the template was never added, though it would make the markup easier to navigate if it was. I'll add it to some of the articles on Grant. Hope there's no pressing need to delete it. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 18:36, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to add the template to the Ulysses S. Grant article, but because the template is being discussed for deletion, a very long and wide 'templates for discussion' tag appears above the template/nav-box, making it difficult to incorporate into the article. You can see what I mean here. If possible, and if there are no pressing issues, can we resolve this matter asap? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I say keep the template in both Presidency and Biography Ulysses S. Grant articles. It really helps link to "forgotten" Grant cabinet members, some who made signifigant positive contributions to the Grant Administration. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, poorly formatted invite. Created by indef'd sockpuppet Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused notice for long defunct Colombia Collaboration. "Recent" is a relative term. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, massive but all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: for the following reasons: a) it was created to facilitate the Western Cape Libraries edit-a-thon that Wikimedia ZA would like to pick up on again after Wikimania 2018. As such it would be useful to keep the template around to help with the project in the future. b) it is not all red links (although it does still need a great deal of work to fill in the large number of red links). If people do wish to delete it then I will understand as there is a chance that the redlinks might remain red for the foreseeable future, but it would be unfortunate and a setback should the Libraries edit-a-thon pick up again. --Discott (talk) 11:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with article (NAC). Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, WP:PERFNAV Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've added it a few more times and there certainly could be more transclusions. Trackinfo (talk) 07:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Trackinfo: your edits have been reverted since the navbox does not contain those article. Also, per WP:PERFNAV users should avoid adding performances of entertainers into the navboxes for the productions that they appeared in. This navbox appears to be totally useless since its entries are already listed in Template:Thirty Seconds to Mars.--Earthh (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To say Template:Thirty Seconds to Mars is a misrepresentation as it only covers the musical projects of the members of the band, not Leto's equally notable individual achievements in the film industry. The template can be expanded to include each of those rather than referring to a wholesale list article. This kind of footer is supposed to be an aid to navigation so adding these saves the user the step of having to look at the list of filmography, where all of the links I added, simply for lead roles, was found.Trackinfo (talk) 17:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Trackinfo: I reverted again your edits. WP:PERFNAV is very clear: "Avoid adding performances of entertainers into the navboxes for the productions that they appeared in". Could you please stop adding Leto's acting credits in the template? There aren't enough articles regarding Leto's works in the film industry to have a specific template.--Earthh (talk) 17:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Rock Radio Stations in Rhode Island. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only three links, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: 3 stations in this state out of a total of only 40-odd stations in the entire state is a good percentage. RINPR is more deserving of deletion anyway.Stereorock (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Rock Radio Stations in Massachusetts. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThere are 3 now & may be more that have been missed.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 19. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 20 July 2017 (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).