October 11

edit


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokémon locations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pokémon regions have been merged into a single article based a consensus discussion. There is no need for this template, as the table of contents of the article itself is sufficient for navigation. Randomran (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Carolingian templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete - have been replaced and are no longer in use Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carolingians, Aquitaine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (second nomination)
Template:Carolingians, Middle Francia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (third nomination)
Template:Carolingians, East Francia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (second nomination)
Template:Carolingians, West Francia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (third nomination)

All these templates are cluttersome sidebars that squeeze text, create white space, and prevent the efficient use of images. They are useless to boot because they are nothing but incomplete genealogies with no clear indicator to the reader of the (ir)relevance of the (limited) information they contain. Each of these templates could be replaced with a less obstructive footer template, as has already been made available for the West Frankish kings. Srnec (talk) 04:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.