Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunder Genomal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunder Genomal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~He is rich, and is therefore included in listicles of rich people, usually placing 70+ in his countries top 100. Nothing significant to pass GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessperson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources seem to be reliable, especially his recognitions indicated. Article is good enough to pass WP:ANYBIO. My vote stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 愛 c) 08:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, however I am leaving the nomination open because it has some merit. MER-C 17:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject meets GNG. Sources are in Hindi language (such as Rajasthan Patrika) but they are reliable sources who have provided significant coverage. Harmanprtjhj (talk) 00:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.