Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Ali Hasan Chauhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rana Ali Hasan Chauhan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. He is published by an advocacy group, has no citations at JSTOR, gets only a mirror hit and a single catalogue entry on GScholar and a couple of minor mentions on GBooks. Worldcat shows little and suggests the possibility that his book was initially self-published (Chauhan Publications). The guy seems to fail WP:AUTHOR, WP:ACADEMIC as well as GNG, although maybe this is systemic thing - I have no means of checking non-English, offline sources. Sitush (talk) 11:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One book written does not a notable person make. 3/4 of the results on Google are WP mirrors; all of the rest are listings of his book or forums. ^King Jakob _C2 16:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Writing one book does not usually make a person notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one would almost think this is prod material. It's a one sentence article about a guy who wrote a book. We could just call it a WP:GNG fail without even moving further up the ladder. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.