Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachna Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachna Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:BASIC. As is an air hostess and the this person who is another woman, has no WP:RS sources. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 16:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)~~ striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been updated and as per citations the current page of Rachna Sharma who is a life strategist differs from the referred Rachna Sharma who is an air hostess.Jalsut (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page as per my verification page is authentic in itself. The dispute regarding similar profile shall be closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshay0712 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per third party citations Rachna Sharma profile as a life strategist is different from news link citing Rachna Sharma air hostess. Ujjwalgill0712 (talk) 10:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment Please don't open new/multiple WP:SOCK and WP:MEAT accounts to save this page. As you are a new editor, I won't report you at WP:SPI, as you are not aware of WP:MULTIPLE. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC) striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is clearly only here for PR, none of it actually amounts to any forms of actual substance. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per the reference section, the subject is on the advisory board and global partner of Mr. Sam Beard's GIFT Foundation who has been adviser to US presidents which can be clarified through https://www.facebook.com/sambeardgift/?fref=nf&pnref=story post about the subject. As per this citation, subject is accomplished figure and amounts to great information.Donna.beard (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam: " Indian Life Strategist, Leadership expert, Speaker, Philanthropist and Author..." etc. Sufficient RS coverage cannot be found. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The references cited are from proven and popular sources - newspapers/websites.Donna.beard (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The citations from reputed journals and newspapers establish credibility of the page.Raghav.padhi (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, but some legit delete !votes came in later; also, the sources of the articles ought to be vetted. Relisting so that we can get more input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contributor issues aside (I did not focus on that when reviewing), I do see this very nice spot of coverage in The Tribune (the The Tribune (Chandigarh)?), so I think a speedy delete might be somewhat preemptive in this case. However, I can't find any other significant sources at the time in nice newspapers, and this trade mag coverage doesn't convince me, so unless more is found I agree Delete. Note there is some reputable coverage of her marriage: [1], [2] (tabloid this one?), [3], but I'm on the fence in this case if they should be considered features on her or her famous hubby - leaning towards latter per WP:Notability is not inherited. I also wonder if any of her companies are individually notable - I did not check. Yvarta (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me on not looking at photos/the top of page - I see there are two. On a side note, found this source [4] in The Hindu that focuses partly on Sharma. Yvarta (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While researching on her I found pretty convincing interview referring to her in detail in yourstory.Jalsut (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG standard. Sources listed in the article are either unreliable or self-published. Anup [Talk] 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.