Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Pandey (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Pandey (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable actor Aloolkaparatha (talk) 11:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I'm not quite seeing notability here, at least not yet. Pandey's appearances have all been in secondary/supporting roles, so invoking WP:NACTOR's "significant roles in multiple notable films" criterion would probably be a stretch. I don't think the awards mentioned move the needle too much either. Of the sources cited, the only one that discusses Pandey in depth (not just a passing mention) is this one. While it seems to be from a reliable outlet, the story seems to be mostly sourced to an interview with Pandey himself, raising independence questions. Moreover, a single source is not enough to meet the GNG, and my attempts to search for coverage in English and Nepali have come up empty-handed. While Pandey may become notable in the future, I don't think he's crossed that threshold yet, although I'm glad to reconsider if there are additional Nepali-language sources that I've missed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think redirect to this would be a better option than delete. If he is unable to pass these criteria. Is award is enough to pass the notability criteria except of GNG. Fade258 (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Lists like that one generally only include notable people, so if Pandey isn't notable he should be removed from the list (and thus there'd be no point to a redirect). The awards probably aren't enough on its own: neither qualifies as the sort of "well-known and significant award or honor" that contributes to notability. I'd be fine with draftifying the article as an alternative to deletion, if you'd like, since there's a chance that he'll become notable in future. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    But he played a significant role in notable tele-films/setial of Nepal in Tito Satya and Jire Khursani. Fade258 (talk) 05:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.