Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peterson Appiah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peterson Appiah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD as contested by an IP for promotional reasons. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly fails GNG and NFOOTY. Wikipedia is not a promotional space either so I totally disagree with the reason given for removal of PROD Spiderone 08:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 14:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sign of notability --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.