Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Gardens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Gardens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be independently notable, either as a building or as a failed(?) construction project. Only references I could find are non-RS forums. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 22:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete May have been notable if it was completed, but as is, there is nothing notable about the failed project. Superman7515 (talk) 22:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have not been able to find any RSes on this failed/on-hold construction project. Does not appear to be notable. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This 59 story building appears to have been what was ultimately built on the site. Clearly notable. ~~Keep~~ and update article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Better yet, merge to Dubai Marriott Harbour Hotel & Suites, about the building at the site. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

skyscraperpage, like skyscrapercity and all sites with user generated content, is not a reliable source. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 05:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I see no reliably sourced information to support the notability of this article. I'd also oppose merge to any other article given the complete lack of any sourcing to indicate the relationship between what was intended to be be built versus whatever happened to end up getting built on the site. -- Whpq (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.