Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.G.S. colony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Antop Hill. History is thereunder for a merge, if desired. Star Mississippi 03:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

C.G.S. colony

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

C.G.S. colony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two sources were added after de-prodding, but editors are still uncertain if this meets WP:GNG Ben Azura (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect or, merge and redirect to Antop Hill the larger neighbourhood in which this central govt. residential enclave is located, as an AtD in the absence of sufficient sourcing to establish notability under the GNG. It could do with a separate heading within that article — at present CGS colony is noted therein. Thought this may be notable and a keep based on it being an early example, if not the earliest, and largest 1950s India central govt. housing complexes but haven't as yet found sourcing to determine this. Rupples (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

  Support redirect. Ben Azura (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

• Merge to Antop Hill, agreeing with Rupples. sourcing online is not good enough to be its own article.

Password ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.