Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Warren Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Very clear consensus that this musician is too WP:TOOSOON to have an article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Warren Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC, and there is no acting credit as main cast for the film, either, so he fails WP:NACTOR. No RS for anything that establishes anything greater than existence, and WP:ENN. I'm also going to add there's a COI, and thus WP:NOTPROMO also applies.MSJapan (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Created as an autobiography, WP:TOOSOON. 2601:188:1:AEA0:30F8:873F:7608:6364 (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't find much coverage, and what we have is two interviews. Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find additional rs for verification. While I did enjoy his guitar playing, his most viewed video on Youtube had only 194 total views. Simply not notable enough for a BLP. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
HitroMilanese, I really don't see the warrant for this edit. This is a clear-cut case for A7. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did nominate the article for A7 initially and after my nomination, user made considerable changes to the article. Considering the editor was new and may not be aware of the guidelines, I left message on his talk page and gave him time to complete the article. The article was in my watchlist, I would have tagged it accordingly later. You may notice, I left message on his talk page stating that "I have removed the speedy deletion tag from the article for now". However, it is a Delete case. Hitro talk 01:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're also the one who nominated it? OK...well, yes, here we are, headed for a SNOW delete. Anyway, thanks for the quick response, Drmies (talk) 02:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails GNG and BAND. --Tagishsimon (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent evidence of significance. Guy (Help!) 23:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.