StockportRedPen
July 2024
edit
Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Argus (Brighton), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you - I'll find a citation. StockportRedPen (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reach plc, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Birmingham Post
- added a link pointing to Peter Saunders
- Coventry Telegraph
- added a link pointing to Keith Perry
- The Yorkshire Post
- added a link pointing to A Woman of Substance
- Yorkshire Evening Post
- added a link pointing to A Woman of Substance
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Craddock (July 26)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Craddock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, StockportRedPen!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Jasper Rees has a new comment
edit
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasper Rees (July 29)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasper Rees and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Birmingham Post
- added a link pointing to Peter Saunders
- Coventry Telegraph
- added a link pointing to Keith Perry
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Jasper Rees for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper Rees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Jeremy Craddock moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Jeremy Craddock 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Not notable. Now part of SPI investigation. Moving to draft space as Draft:Jeremy Craddock already exists. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.