Cesc44

oh hello mr. dont mention his full name more than once. we only mention last name to refer to subjects of pages. also get me newspaper source which states his profession is an Agriculturalist. and also no need to mention 2001 to 2005 and 2005 - 2010 as his mayor tenure . it is already mentioned in the article so keep the template simple. just mention 2001 to 2010. if you dont know the manual of style for wikipedia pages. just leave and dont bother editing page about your close relative...

by the way. i have added some more interesting info to this page. the more you edit this page to hide stuff. the more information you will see being added to page which will never be deleted because everything is properly sourced and verified through newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.116.51 (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

LOL having life issues? No girlfriend? its okay. the new things that you have added to your page do not belong to TARIQ BASHIR CHEEMA. read it and fix your baseless information. LOL. you funny man.

And take a hint from this persons page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makhdoom_Ahmed_Mehmood. No implications here. I know how to perform my updates. There were gaps in 2005 before the next elections happened. That is why you keep it seperate. Also regarding the 55Rs tax. read the article it is not tariq cheema. difference in tahir and tariq. Get your facts right. Stop adding false news. And about him being an agricultrist. ASK ANYONE. why the hell would a news paper talked about him being an agriculturist. go to the NA page and read. And regarding the disqualification. AGAIN GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT. its not him. how can you stay a damn chairman of a committe while being disqualified. He was part of the 6 member opposition bench for panama committee. https://www.geo.tv/latest/106477-Panama-Papers-Govt-finalises-names-for-Parliamentary-committee I am just trying to add right information and dont have time for this. If you want to undo and redo then so be it or else lets meet in the middle. I am not adding anything wrong but you surely are.

April 2017

Your recent editing history at Tariq Bashir Cheema shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TheDragonFire. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. TheDragonFire (talk) 15:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tariq Bashir Cheema. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Saqib (talk) 07:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Saqib, What was wrong with the last edit. Just added name in Urdu and formatted in a better way. Did not delete or add anything? Just answer.

Now I just added the name in urdu under the actual name in English. Will this ruin your sleep tonight? Jeez man. Do you have nothing better to do? I mean its a NAME.

We usually do not add names of the subject in Urdu language inside the infoboxes. --Saqib (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Does it say anywhere you can't? Plus I deleted nationality as Pakistani and just added a flag instead of it. I am within the rules Saqib. If you are doing this on purpose, when clearly there is no need for it ; I can't help you. I am not adding nor deleting anything. JUST UPDATING. so please co-operate. Other than that all I did was I moved the paragraphs together, especially for the information that belongs in the same paragraph. If I do anything wrong, feel free to point it out and if it is wrong I wont do it. But please be reasonable.

Now I just added (). I hope this wont cause you any issue or this doesnt break wikipedia rules. Come on just do not waste my time and I do not want to waste your time. If I do anything wrong, just point it out by messaging and wont do it. But if I add anything new I will let you know since you are paying attention to this page.

Why don't you take a moment to scrutinize my contributions that I made to Wikipedia? You will see that I focus on BLP's related to Pakistani lawmakers therefore it is your misunderstanding that I am giving this page some special attention or I have got some kind of personal vendetta against you or this Chaudhry. you reinserting the material that I am objecting to which clearly shows that you're here to force your rules and not follow the style we follow. For the instance, you need to look at the bio of Muhammad Ali Jinnah which is one of the best articles Wikipedia has. Do you see the name in Urdu script inside the box? If not, then we need to follow the same for every other bio page. Similarly, you cannot add flag inside nationality filed. You need to follow the MoS, and if you don't then you breaching the guidelines. Lets no engage in edit wars, because it won't help at any case. I hope this clear things. Also I insist you to improve your attitude towards me or otherwise you risk being blocked. Try to be civil and you will see my co-operating with you otherwise I am not bound to reply you. --Saqib (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Question is does the MOS say that you cannot add flag instead of name? Is adding name in the bio side wrong? NO. I just read the MOS and there is no such statement that validates your response. then you say im reinserting the material that you are objecting to which means im here to force rules. But I just told you I did not add anything. Just small parenthesis and maybe a flag. It is following the rules. You are the one imposing your rules. Now in the bio info section you have deleted District mayor timeline. I feel bad for myself wasting time on you. Just add the bio for district mayor. Now dont come back and say oh Mr Jinnah does not have such bio so does not need to be added. My attitude towards you is getting worse now because of your acting like a child. God knows where you're from, but how do you expect someone to be civil with you when you're the one imposing your rules.

Why don't you provide me few examples of fine articles where infoboxes incorporates both Urdu script and flags. Concerning the District mayor mention, we don't need to mention in the infobox each and every public office Choudhry has held during his career. Only the major ones should be listed in my opinion to refrain the infobox from getting long. As for your question where I come from, I am from Pakistan and lives in Russia , however I think you need to stop personal attacks. You should comment on the content, not on me because it is not going to help you. --Saqib (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Alright man. If you see anything that should not be done, just let me know. Also if I add anything i'll let you know.

Sure. by the way, are you in anyway connected to Tariq Bashir Cheema? --Saqib (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

I am from his region and know him politically. Familiar with Bahawalpur Politics. Bahawalpur is again the district where Cheema is from. I just moved the elections points one cap space backband moved the elections details in one paragraph. Also added a line from the source to the Dawn news section for more clarification for the reader.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cesc44, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Saqib (talk) 07:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sockpuppetry, edit-warring, and incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GAB^gab 22:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)