Talk:Psilocybin mushroom

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AndyFielding in topic "Showed controversy"?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 February 2020 and 11 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexysriley.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emma3690, Justin.Logsdon, Connorhall7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

How reliable is Samorini's article?

edit

I'm talking about notes: [5] & [6] I cannot find him on Scopus [1] and he has a really low score on ResearchGate [2] Digressivo (talk) 00:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I removed the (unreliable) Samorini's article quote from the page for the reasons expressed in Talk:Psilocybin --Digressivo (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hey I had added Samorini 1992 article before I saw this thread. Although the source seems different. I also coulnd't find anything about Lajoux 1964. But it's seems pretty typical for literature of 60 years. Can somebody take a look? Mekatra (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Author search results". Scopus. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
  2. ^ "Giorgio Samorini's RG profile". ResearchGate. Retrieved 11 August 2020.

Orphaned references in Psilocybin mushroom

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Psilocybin mushroom's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "IBT":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 20:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Showed controversy"?

edit
This, and another experiment administering psilocybin to graduate divinity students, showed controversy.

I've never heard of controversy being "shown". Could the writer have meant "caused" or "created"? – AndyFielding (talk) 12:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply