Talk:Illicium anisatum
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
See the following
edithttp://www.henriettesherbal.com/eclectic/journals/ajp1881/08-illicium.html --222.67.205.85 (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Also, I'm not sure if the following article is a valid one, as it can not be retrieved from the webiste indicated by Economic Botany
http://www.jstor.org/pss/4255854 --222.67.205.85 (talk) 09:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 6 December 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that Illicium anisatum be renamed and moved to Japanese star anise. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Illicium anisatum → Japanese star anise – WP:COMMONNAME. Ngrams. See Talk:Illicium verum#Requested move 18 November 2024. Theparties (talk) 04:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:COMMONNAME is not the issue; a case must be made based on WP:NCFLORA. I see no reason to move this article based on NCFLORA. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC)