Talk:Harjit Sajjan
Latest comment: 3 years ago by WildComet in topic Former Military titles with "the honourable"
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harjit Sajjan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month. |
Military Service
editUseful article for info http://www.nationalobserver.com/2015/11/04/opinion/you-have-no-idea-how-badass-trudeaus-defence-minister-really Legacypac (talk) 07:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
RfC regarding the capitalization style for "False Claims Regarding Military Role"
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Shouldn't the section be titled "False claims regarding military role" instead, as per my previous edit and the MOS entry on section headings? 99.228.147.27 (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, obviously - we don't need an rfc to settle this as the MOS makes it clear that only the first letter is capitalized. Isn't that section title a bit POV though? Fyddlestix (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm not very familiar with Wikipedia editing, and didn't want to step on anyone's shoes. I'm not quite sure what you mean by POV- point of view as in a bit biased? If so, I can see where you're coming with that. Perhaps rephrasing to use controversy (along with another word or two) would make it less verbose and succinct. 99.228.147.27 (talk) 08:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- The MoS uses sentence case in headings. –Sb2001 01:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
im really confused with wikipedia if someone could help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Havy143 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Dead link
editRef no. 4 of the present version contains dead link, which I am unable to find at Internet Archive. But I guess this link can be used to replace the dead link. As I am not fully sure regarding the similarity of these two links, I am leaving it to others. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Former Military titles with "the honourable"
editThe issue of whether former military titles should be included in the top of the infobox is being discussed at Talk:Erin O'Toole#"Captain the Honourable" in infobox. That may also affect this page.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ranks should not be included as honorifics for retired members. It is improper as they are not entitled to display the full rank without indicating they are retired per QR&O, Article 15.09 (available here). Rank is also displayed in the military service section of the infobox with appropriate dates of service, and does not need to be duplicated. Thanks, WildComet (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)