Talk:2010 Carfax 400/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Airplaneman in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Airplaneman 04:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)—To save space, I will not sign my comments. I will also copyedit the article while reviewing; please review all of my revisions.Reply

Wow, you really getting picky! Only few web pages have sources and some of this can't be done, because I wouldn't know. --Nascar1996 Contributions / Guestbook 14:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Note that they aren't required for GA, but are good for article improvement. Maybe I'll ask someone else to take a look as well.

(deindent) Airplaneman asked me to look for any more improvements. I like how you expanded the lead paragraphs to about the right length. The background is great - I really like the history of the track layout. A newsperson did the national anthem? Wow! "due to accidents" - "due to" is one of the weak grammar phrases [1] so I bet a stronger alternative can be found. There are multiple cases of the phrase. "Kahne's vacated third position" - did he voluntarily give up the race like vacate implies [2]? "Debutant" - learned a new word that's in the dictionary - good job with the useful word - it's good day when you learn something new! "Said made a good restart, but because of his older tires, Ambrose passed him." - needs a reference that the older tires allowed him to get passed because lots of times older tires don't hurt that much. "Ambrose made a good restart on lap 70 to keep Johnson behind him." - "good" restart - it that WP:NPOV or can you use a more neutral term (several cases)? "because Keselowski had fluid coming out of his race car after being spun around by Gilliland." - anytime someone spins out someone then there needs to be reliable source because of WP:BLP. Overall - the quality of grammar is light years ahead of where you were at even 1 month ago. You now see how grammar and editing is supposed to be done - neutral tone, varied prose, great grammar. I'd love it if the WikiProject NASCAR crew would return the favor for me and peer review Alan Kulwicki to see if we can get our first Featured Article. Royalbroil 01:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I accidentally reviewed the wrong article: 2010 Toyota/Save Mart 350. My comments could be used to improve that article. The "due to" comment is universal and the same with the "good" comment . Royalbroil 02:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  One of you comments helped, "Kahne's vacated third position" - did he voluntarily give up the race like vacate implies" Nascar1996 Contributions / Guestbook 02:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Closing notes
Congrats, Nascar1996, for a job well done! Your timely response and hard work greatly contributed to the successful outcome of this GAN. Thanks also to NSD and RoyalBroil for their help. I feel that this article now easily meets the GA criteria, so I'm happy to pass it. Airplaneman 20:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit

Background

edit

Practice and qualifying

edit

Race summary

edit
  • Any international television coverage?
  • " Conditions were partly cloudy with a high of 80 °F (27 °C), making the track potentially slippery." – the reference does not support the part in bold.  Done Nascar1996 Contributions / Guestbook 14:36, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Big giant copyedit here. Please take a moment to look at my edit and the edit summary.
  • The two sentences below could be combined, assuming McDowell, Jones, and Nemecheck are all part of start and park teams. Try, On lap 23, Michael McDowell and P.J. Jones drove to the garage, followed by Joe Nemecheck two laps later, as the three drivers' teams were using the "start and park" tactic to save costs. Note that the race summary reference does not mention start and park, so you'll have to find another reference for that (do you remember the TV broadcast? Maybe it was mentioned there. Or try the race rewind).
    • Afterward, Michael McDowell and P. J. Jones drove to the garage. - when and why? "Afterward" is too vague for an event like this; in this case, it would be OK to say the lap number.
    • Then, Joe Nemechek drove to the garage because of being a start and park team. - could be worded better
  • Five laps later, light rain falling in turn three prompted the second caution. - define turn three with a link or a note in parentheses, or even a more detailed note in the reference section (see here for an example). I would mention the location of turn three ("the turn at the end of the backstretch" or something).  Done Nascar1996 Contributions / Guestbook 19:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Post-race

edit

Other

edit
Qualifying
  • The "Car" header is a bit vague. Maybe "Car number"?
  • The "Speed" header needs to specify what value speed (in this case, miles per hour, or MPH) – sample header: Speed (in MPH)
  • The "Time" header needs to say what value of time – sample header: Time (in seconds)
  • Comment - I added "Failed to qualify" in the space between the drivers who race and the drivers who failed to qualify so the readers know what happened to those drivers. Hopefully there aren't any issues with that edit. Just being bold. ~NSD () 15:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    • Looks good!
Race results
Standings after the race
Miscellany
  • It is getting harder for me to make suggestions every review, as you're already implementing suggestions from me and others from past reviews. Overall, this article could beef up on prose. I'm going to be extra-picky, then :)!
  • The references need a consistent format. For instance, I see four different ways of citing NASCAR.com sources:
    • NASCAR (ref #1)
    • nascar.com (ref #'s 5, 14, and 22)
    • www.nascar.com (ref #'s 9, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20)
    • NASCAR.com (ref #'s 10, 18, 21, 26, and 28)
  • I would suggest just plain NASCAR, as that is what you're doing with the rest of the news sources. Refs like "www.speedway-guide.com" should be just plain "speedway-guide.com" as that is what is in big bold letters at the top of any page on the site. To stick to that format, you need to change refs like "www.mispeedway.com" to "Michigan International Speedway". "racingreference.com." and "www.racing-reference.info" are therefore renamed "racing-reference.info".
  • Also, the date format needs to be consistent. Currently, there is Month-Date-Year (MDY) as well as Date-Month-Year (DMY). Since MDY is more common, I have formatted the rest accordingly. If you're interested, here is the script, although I'm not sure if it works in Internet Explorer.  Done and you missed one of my mistakes. The first ref doesn't show the information. Nascar1996 Contributions / Guestbook 19:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • For news article references, please use {{cite news}} so the author and publication date can be shown.