Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) at 16:33, 9 September 2020 (Amendment to arbitration procedures: prohibition of multiple roles: enact motion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Motions

Amendment to arbitration procedures: prohibition of multiple roles

Based on the outcome of the community discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RFC: Multiple roles for active arbitrators, the Arbitration Committee procedures are amended by adding a new Section 1.6, providing:

To avoid any potential conflicts of interest, current arbitrators may not serve as members of either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee while serving as arbitrators.

For this motion there are 14 active arbitrators. With 0 arbitrators abstaining, 8 support or oppose votes are a majority.

Enacted - Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. This amendment would implement the outcome of the recent RfC, in which there was a community consensus that arbitrators should not concurrently hold these additional roles. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. per RfC WormTT(talk) 17:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Per the RfC. Katietalk 18:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. bradv🍁 19:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. xenotalk 19:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Maxim(talk) 20:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 23:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. per RfC Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. – Joe (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Arbitrator discussion and comments

Community discussion and comments