Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
→‎Formal proposal: Closing discussion (DiscussionCloser v.1.7.2)
Line 328:
 
===Formal proposal===
{{atop
| status =
| result = There is consensus to enact this revised editing restriction. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 01:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
}}
 
 
Based on how this discussion has progressed I propose the following:
 
Line 371 ⟶ 377:
::: [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 19:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I've noticed this as well. Rich manages to ''sound'' very reasonable when excusing his unreasonable actions. This includes his current argument that I should've spoken to him on his talk page before bringing this here. That sounds very reasonable, and in many if not most cases I would agree, but I knew from previous experience that he would do just what he is doing here, making excuses and pretending not actually know what the problem is, and other delaying tactics, and it would not curtail the problematic editing. It's not worth going into the details but I've had other encounters with him where by the end it was clear he'd not been entirely honest, despite his actual language being painfully polite. To my mind this is actually more impolite that just being blunt and honest in your language. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 19:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
{{abot}}
 
== [[User:ThosLop]] ==