Content deleted Content added
→An unblock without asking for assurances but with some advice: Replying to Doc James (using reply-link) |
|||
Line 849:
::Hey All. Lets just drop this. I am sure Starship understands things. I have an email indicating that they do. {{u|Geni}} the unblock was not cool but everyone lets just move forwards. We do not need this. I have requested [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram#Update_from_Doc_James here] for more time. I have requested that people also cool it just a bit. Starship.paint you may resume editing but please be more careful. As a general rule do NOT link to any outside accounts regardless of if you see others doing the same. Reach out to admins personally if you are thinking of doing so and have questions regarding what is appropriate. [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 20:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:::I am really sick of being told I need to move on every time a sysop breaks policy because they're outraged about what's happening here. I am outraged. But those policies are in place to protect people like me who are not unblockable. Who are not sysops or crats and cannot press buttons themselves. I think I'm a pretty good faith editor and I hope that I amm civil with everyone I interact with on Wikipedia because that matters to me. But every time someone in a trust position goes rogue like this and the response is "let's move on" my concern that someone will go rogue on me increases. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 20:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||