Content deleted Content added
Mr rnddude (talk | contribs) →Discussion related to above survey: An aspersion is the suggestion that you have been misbehaving when that is not possible to substantiate. To paraphrase a quote of yours, is not akin to casting an aspersion. |
Waleswatcher (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 307:
::::::::: Care to comment on substance, rather than casting aspersions and failing to assume good faith? <small>'''<span style="color:Olive">Waleswatcher</span>''' [[User_talk:Waleswatcher#top|''(<span style="color:green">talk</span>)'']]</small> 23:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::It's not an aspersion; you did, point blank, threaten to engage in disruptive editing if the discussion didn't go your way. Quote: {{tq|By the way, if we cannot reach a consensus in favor of my version (right now its 11-9 against, so doesn't look promising), I intend to simply copy the lead from AR-15 style rifle into this section, as per WP:SYNC}}, and Diff: [[Special:diff/841090940]]. [[User:Mr rnddude|Mr rnddude]] ([[User talk:Mr rnddude|talk]]) 00:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::: There's nothing disruptive about that. It would be standard [[WP:BRD]] - except that I'm announcing what I'm intending to do (and why) in advance so it can be discussed, which makes it more careful (and less bold) than wiki standard. Now, do you care to comment on substance, or are you going to continue to be tendentious? <small>'''<span style="color:Olive">Waleswatcher</span>''' [[User_talk:Waleswatcher#top|''(<span style="color:green">talk</span>)'']]</small> 00:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
| |||