Mirror stage: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m LQ, punct.
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.2)
Line 5:
 
==History of development==
Lacan's concept of the mirror stage was strongly inspired by earlier work by psychologist [[Henri Wallon (psychologist)|Henri Wallon]], who speculated based on observations of animals and humans responding to their reflections in mirrors.<ref name ="Webster">Webster, Richard. (2002) "[http://www.richardwebster.net/thecultoflacan.html The cult of Lacan: Freud, Lacan and the mirror stage.]"</ref> Wallon noted that by the age of about six months, human infants and chimpanzees both ''seem'' to recognize their reflection in a mirror. While chimpanzees rapidly lose interest in the discovery, human infants typically become very interested and devote much time and effort to exploring the connections between their bodies and their images.<ref name="Evans, 2005">[[Dylan Evans|Evans, Dylan]] (2005). "[http://beta.finance-on.net/upload/ver/ver4480020c6d2b2/lacan.pdf From Lacan to Darwin] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502205406/http://beta.finance-on.net/upload/ver/ver4480020c6d2b2/lacan.pdf |date=2014-05-02 }}," in ''The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative'', eds. Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp38-55.</ref> In a 1931 paper, Wallon argued that mirrors helped children develop a sense of self-identity. However, later [[mirror test]] research indicates that while toddlers are usually fascinated by mirrors, they do not actually recognize themselves in mirrors until the age of 15 months at the earliest,<ref>Lewis, Michael, Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, and John Jaskir. "Individual Differences in Visual Self-recognition as a Function of Mother-infant Attachment Relationship." Developmental Psychobiology 21.6 (1985) 1181-87</ref> leading psychoanalytically trained critic Norman N. Holland to declare that "there is no evidence whatsoever for Lacan's notion of a mirror stage".<ref>Holland, Norman N. (1998) [http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/nholland/lacan.htm The Trouble(s) With Lacan]".</ref> Similarly, physician [[Raymond Tallis]]<ref>Tallis, Raymond.
(1988) ''Not Saussure: A Critique of Post-Saussurean Literary Theory'', Macmillan, 1988, p. 153.</ref> notes that a literal interpretation of the Lacanian mirror stage contradicts empirical observations about human identity and personality: "If epistemological maturation and the formation of a world picture were dependent upon catching sight of oneself in a mirror, then the [mirror stage] theory would predict that congenitally blind individuals would lack selfhood and be unable to enter language, society or the world at large. There is no evidence whatsoever that this implausible consequence of the theory is borne out in practice."