Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dronebogus (talk | contribs) |
→Proposed TBAN for Epiphyllumlover from Abortion space: close; consensus to tban |
||
Line 229:
=== Proposed TBAN for Epiphyllumlover from Abortion space ===
{{atop|result={{U|Epiphyllumlover}} is indefinitely [[WP:TBAN|topic-banned]] from pages and discussions related to [[abortion]], broadly construed. This includes any ongoing or future sockpuppet investigations. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">— [[User:Wugapodes|Wug·]][[User talk:Wugapodes|a·po·des]]</span> 21:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)}}
I am proposing a TBAN for user Epiphyllumlover for reasons that can be seen discussed in the above sections[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Where_should_the_counting_begin_for_Wikipedia:Silence_and_consensus_?] (initially started by Epiphyllumlover in response to this edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roe_v._Wade&type=revision&diff=1088743214&oldid=1088627319] of mine) and summarized here:
Line 284 ⟶ 285:
::[[wp:Bludgeoning]] is a policy ''supplement'', and a very widely accepted one. [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|talk]]) 20:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I located a third head to the sock, which means I need to fill out another SPI form. I see the individual who has been socking as mostly gratified for personal reasons rather than by dedication to a particular topic. The topic ban may be implemented before I finish compiling things for a new SPI submission; this could take some time. Will that preclude me starting and following-up on an SPI which includes abortion-related socking over the last month?--[[User:Epiphyllumlover|Epiphyllumlover]] ([[User talk:Epiphyllumlover|talk]]) 16:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
{{abot}}
== Hulged (Wahhid) unban request ==
| |||