Revision as of 11:26, 17 January 2022 edit Hemantha (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,746 edits →‎NPOV: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:50, 17 January 2022 edit undo Kautilya3 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 85,546 edits →‎NPOV: Reply Next edit →
Line 166: :: The first sentence of [[WP:YESPOV]]: ''Achieving what the Wikipedia community understands as neutrality means carefully and critically analyzing a variety of reliable sources and then attempting to convey to the reader the information contained in them fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without editorial bias.'' -- [[User:Kautilya3\|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3\|talk]]) 11:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC) :::@[[User:Kautilya3\|Kautilya3]] Okay, but every single editor I've responded to there is less than 6 month old accounts with may be 100 edits at max (except Yogesh who added the tag per these new accounts' claim). [[User:Hemantha\|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha\|brief]]) 11:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC) :::: Ok, then I suppose they are fast learners, or bring some background from their lives outside Wikipedia. The fact remains that they are stating the NPOV requirements correctly. ''The Wire'' did an investigation and reported the findings. So it is a [[WP:PRIMARY]] source for us. Unless these issues are widely accepted and reported as fact, we cannot report them as fact. This has nothing to do with ''The Wire'' being an [[WP:RS]] or not. -- [[User:Kautilya3\|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3\|talk]]) 11:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Hemantha