Edit count of the user (user_editcount ) | null |
Name of the user account (user_name ) | '174.21.172.115' |
Age of the user account (user_age ) | 0 |
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups ) | [
0 => '*'
] |
Rights that the user has (user_rights ) | [
0 => 'createaccount',
1 => 'read',
2 => 'edit',
3 => 'createtalk',
4 => 'writeapi',
5 => 'viewmywatchlist',
6 => 'editmywatchlist',
7 => 'viewmyprivateinfo',
8 => 'editmyprivateinfo',
9 => 'editmyoptions',
10 => 'abusefilter-log-detail',
11 => 'urlshortener-create-url',
12 => 'centralauth-merge',
13 => 'abusefilter-view',
14 => 'abusefilter-log',
15 => 'vipsscaler-test'
] |
Whether the user is editing from mobile app (user_app ) | true |
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile ) | true |
Page ID (page_id ) | 40489816 |
Page namespace (page_namespace ) | 0 |
Page title without namespace (page_title ) | 'Rate-of-living theory' |
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle ) | 'Rate-of-living theory' |
Edit protection level of the page (page_restrictions_edit ) | [] |
Last ten users to contribute to the page (page_recent_contributors ) | [
0 => 'OAbot',
1 => 'JJMC89 bot III',
2 => 'Msimm007',
3 => 'Random from the burgh',
4 => 'Rjwilmsi',
5 => 'InternetArchiveBot',
6 => 'Onel5969',
7 => '80.192.71.238',
8 => 'Citation bot',
9 => 'Oshwah'
] |
Page age in seconds (page_age ) | 217060357 |
Action (action ) | 'edit' |
Edit summary/reason (summary ) | 'Fixed grammar' |
Old content model (old_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
New content model (new_content_model ) | 'wikitext' |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext ) | '[[File:Rate of living img.png|thumb|As metabolic rate increases the lifespan of an organism is expected to decrease as well. The rate at which this occurs is not fixed and thus the -45° slope in this graph is just an example and not a constant.]]
The '''rate of living theory''' postulates that the faster an organism’s [[metabolism]], the shorter its [[Longevity|lifespan]]. The theory was originally created by [[Max Rubner]] in 1908 after his observation that larger animals outlived smaller ones, and that the larger animals had slower metabolisms.<ref>Rubner, M. (1908). Das Problem det Lebensdaur und seiner beziehunger zum Wachstum und Ernarnhung. Munich: Oldenberg.</ref> After its inception by Rubner, it was further expanded upon through the work of [[Raymond Pearl]]. Outlined in his book, ''The Rate of Living'' published in 1928, Pearl conducted a series of experiments in drosophila and cantaloupe seeds that corroborated Rubner’s initial observation that a slowing of metabolism increased lifespan.<ref>Raymond Pearl. The Rate of Living. 1928</ref>
Further strength was given to these observations by the discovery of [[Max Kleiber’s law]] in 1932. Colloquially called the “mouse-to-elephant” curve, Kleiber’s conclusion was that [[basal metabolic rate]] could accurately be predicted by taking 3/4 the power of body weight. This conclusion was especially noteworthy because the inversion of its scaling exponent, between 0.2 and 0.33, was the scaling for lifespan and metabolic rate.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Speakman J. R. | year = 2005 | title = Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan | url = | journal = J Exp Biol | volume = 208 | issue = 9| pages = 1717–1730 | doi = 10.1242/jeb.01556 | pmid = 15855403 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
==Mechanism==
Mechanistic evidence was provided by [[Denham Harman]]'s [[free radical theory of aging]], created in the 1950s. This theory stated that organisms age over time due to the accumulation of damage from free radicals in the body.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal | author = Harman D | year = 1956 | title = Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry | url = | journal = Journal of Gerontology | volume = 11 | issue = 3| pages = 298–300 | doi = 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.663.3809 | pmid = 13332224 }}</ref> It also showed that metabolic processes, specifically the [[mitochondria]], are prominent producers of free radicals.<ref name=":0" /> This provided a mechanistic link between Rubner's initial observations of decreased lifespan in conjunction with increased metabolism.
==Current state of theory==
Support for this theory has been bolstered by studies linking a lower [[basal metabolic rate]] (evident with a lowered heartbeat) to increased life expectancy.<ref>http://physrev.physiology.org/content/87/4/1175.full</ref><ref>http://www.discoverymedicine.com/S-J-Olshansky/2009/07/25/what-determines-longevity-metabolic-rate-or-stability</ref><ref>http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/19/20/2399.full</ref> This has been proposed by some to be the key to why animals like the [[Giant tortoise|Giant Tortoise]] can live over 150 years.<ref>http://www.immortalhumans.com/the-longevity-secret-for-tortoises-is-held-in-their-low-metabolism-rate/</ref>
However, the ratio of resting metabolic rate to total daily [[energy]] expenditure can vary between 1.6 and 8.0 between species of [[mammal]]s. Animals also vary in the degree of [[Chemiosmosis|coupling between oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production]], the amount of [[saturated fat]] in mitochondrial [[Outer mitochondrial membrane|membrane]]s, the amount of [[DNA repair]], and many other factors that affect maximum life span.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Speakman JR, Selman C, McLaren JS, Harper EJ | title=Living fast, dying when? The link between aging and energetics | journal=The Journal of Nutrition | volume=132 | issue=6, Supplement 2 | year=2002 | pages=1583S–1597S | url=http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/6/1583S | pmid=12042467 | doi=10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S | doi-access=free }}</ref> Furthermore, a number of species with high metabolic rate, like bats and birds, are long-lived.<ref>{{cite book|last=Austad|first=Steven|title=Why We Age: What Science Is Discovering about the Body's Journey through Life|url=https://archive.org/details/whyweagewhatscie00aust|url-access=registration|year=1997|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|location=New York}}</ref> In a 2007 analysis it was shown that, when modern statistical methods for correcting for the effects of body size and phylogeny are employed, metabolic rate does not correlate with longevity in mammals or birds.<ref>{{Cite journal|vauthors=de Magalhães JP, Costa J, Church GM |title=An Analysis of the Relationship Between Metabolism, Developmental Schedules, and Longevity Using Phylogenetic Independent Contrasts |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=149–60 |date=1 February 2007 |pmid=17339640 |pmc=2288695 |url=http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17339640 |doi=10.1093/gerona/62.2.149 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><br />
== Disproving the Rate-of-Living theory ==
A recent article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />
In another article, Anne Bronikowski and David Vleck also explain how the Rate-of-living theory didn't quite follow their research either. By using the garter snake as the subject, they studied two different groups. One group had a shorter life span and fast growth which resulted in early reproduction, and the other group consisted of snakes with a longer lifespan, later reproductive rate, and later maturation.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Bronikowski|first=Anne|last2=Vleck|first2=David|date=2010-11-01|title=Metabolism, Body Size and Life Span: A Case Study in Evolutionarily Divergent Populations of the Garter Snake (Thamnophis elegans)|url=https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/50/5/880/646116|journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology|language=en|volume=50|issue=5|pages=880–887|doi=10.1093/icb/icq132|issn=1540-7063|doi-access=free}}</ref> They wanted to determine if metabolism in fully grown and mature animals were different from the two different groups they were examining.<ref name=":2" /> It was discovered that the Rate-of-living theory initially, did agree with their metabolic results which demonstrated that the faster group would reach a larger mass, and had a higher metabolic rate compared to the longer lived group.<ref name=":2" /> The correlation between metabolism and lifespan the Rate-of-living theory created did prove true in this part of the experiment. However, Bronikowski and Vleck discovered the relationship between the Rate-of-living theory and their experiment isn't that straightforward. Between both groups, their isn't a large difference of their metabolic rates at birth.<ref name=":2" /> Resulting in the Rate-of-living theory inconsistent. It was also found that their wasn't a difference in either groups resting metabolic rate.<ref name=":2" /> Bronikowski and Vleck came to the conclusion that the reason for their results was because of increased oxygen consumption from the shorter lived group could have caused oxidative stress in the snakes resulting in a shorter lifespan.<ref name=":2" />
==See also==
• [[DNA damage theory of aging]]
== References ==
{{reflist}}
*Rubner, M. (1908). Das Problem der Lebensdauer und seiner beziehungen zum Wachstum und Ernährung. Munich: Oldenberg.
*Raymond Pearl. The Rate of Living. 1928
*{{cite journal | author = Speakman J. R. | year = 2005 | title = Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan | url = | journal = The Journal of Experimental Biology | volume = 208 | issue = Pt 9| pages = 1717–1730 | doi = 10.1242/jeb.01556 | pmid = 15855403 | doi-access = free }}
*{{cite journal | author = Harman D | year = 1956 | title = Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry | url = | journal = Journal of Gerontology | volume = 11 | issue = 3| pages = 298–300 | doi = 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.663.3809 | pmid = 13332224 }}
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Speakman JR, Selman C, McLaren JS, Harper EJ | date = June 2002 | title = Living fast, dying when? The link between aging and energetics | url = | journal = Journal of Nutrition | volume = 132 | issue = 6| pages = 1583S–97S | doi = 10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S | pmid = 12042467 | doi-access = free }}
*{{cite journal |author1=Holloszy J. O. |author2=Smith E. K. | year = 1986 | title = Longevity of cold-exposed rats: A reevaluation of the "rate-of-living theory | url = | journal = Journal of Applied Physiology | volume = 61 | issue = Suppl 2 | pages = 1656–1660 |doi=10.1152/jappl.1986.61.5.1656 |pmid=3781978 }}
[[Category:Theories of biological ageing]]
[[Category:Metabolism]]
{{portal bar|Metabolism}}' |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext ) | '[[File:Rate of living img.png|thumb|As metabolic rate increases the lifespan of an organism is expected to decrease as well. The rate at which this occurs is not fixed and thus the -45° slope in this graph is just an example and not a constant.]]
The '''rate of living theory''' postulates that the faster an organism’s [[metabolism]], the shorter its [[Longevity|lifespan]]. The theory was originally created by [[Max Rubner]] in 1908 after his observation that larger animals outlived smaller ones, and that the larger animals had slower metabolisms.<ref>Rubner, M. (1908). Das Problem det Lebensdaur und seiner beziehunger zum Wachstum und Ernarnhung. Munich: Oldenberg.</ref> After its inception by Rubner, it was further expanded upon through the work of [[Raymond Pearl]]. Outlined in his book, ''The Rate of Living'' published in 1928, Pearl conducted a series of experiments in drosophila and cantaloupe seeds that corroborated Rubner’s initial observation that a slowing of metabolism increased lifespan.<ref>Raymond Pearl. The Rate of Living. 1928</ref>
Further strength was given to these observations by the discovery of [[Max Kleiber’s law]] in 1932. Colloquially called the “mouse-to-elephant” curve, Kleiber’s conclusion was that [[basal metabolic rate]] could accurately be predicted by taking 3/4 the power of body weight. This conclusion was especially noteworthy because the inversion of its scaling exponent, between 0.2 and 0.33, was the scaling for lifespan and metabolic rate.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Speakman J. R. | year = 2005 | title = Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan | url = | journal = J Exp Biol | volume = 208 | issue = 9| pages = 1717–1730 | doi = 10.1242/jeb.01556 | pmid = 15855403 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
==Mechanism==
Mechanistic evidence was provided by [[Denham Harman]]'s [[free radical theory of aging]], created in the 1950s. This theory stated that organisms age over time due to the accumulation of damage from free radicals in the body.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal | author = Harman D | year = 1956 | title = Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry | url = | journal = Journal of Gerontology | volume = 11 | issue = 3| pages = 298–300 | doi = 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.663.3809 | pmid = 13332224 }}</ref> It also showed that metabolic processes, specifically the [[mitochondria]], are prominent producers of free radicals.<ref name=":0" /> This provided a mechanistic link between Rubner's initial observations of decreased lifespan in conjunction with increased metabolism.
==Current state of theory==
Support for this theory has been bolstered by studies linking a lower [[basal metabolic rate]] (evident with a lowered heartbeat) to increased life expectancy.<ref>http://physrev.physiology.org/content/87/4/1175.full</ref><ref>http://www.discoverymedicine.com/S-J-Olshansky/2009/07/25/what-determines-longevity-metabolic-rate-or-stability</ref><ref>http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/19/20/2399.full</ref> This has been proposed by some to be the key to why animals like the [[Giant tortoise|Giant Tortoise]] can live over 150 years.<ref>http://www.immortalhumans.com/the-longevity-secret-for-tortoises-is-held-in-their-low-metabolism-rate/</ref>
However, the ratio of resting metabolic rate to total daily [[energy]] expenditure can vary between 1.6 and 8.0 between species of [[mammal]]s. Animals also vary in the degree of [[Chemiosmosis|coupling between oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production]], the amount of [[saturated fat]] in mitochondrial [[Outer mitochondrial membrane|membrane]]s, the amount of [[DNA repair]], and many other factors that affect maximum life span.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Speakman JR, Selman C, McLaren JS, Harper EJ | title=Living fast, dying when? The link between aging and energetics | journal=The Journal of Nutrition | volume=132 | issue=6, Supplement 2 | year=2002 | pages=1583S–1597S | url=http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/6/1583S | pmid=12042467 | doi=10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S | doi-access=free }}</ref> Furthermore, a number of species with high metabolic rate, like bats and birds, are long-lived.<ref>{{cite book|last=Austad|first=Steven|title=Why We Age: What Science Is Discovering about the Body's Journey through Life|url=https://archive.org/details/whyweagewhatscie00aust|url-access=registration|year=1997|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|location=New York}}</ref> In a 2007 analysis it was shown that, when modern statistical methods for correcting for the effects of body size and phylogeny are employed, metabolic rate does not correlate with longevity in mammals or birds.<ref>{{Cite journal|vauthors=de Magalhães JP, Costa J, Church GM |title=An Analysis of the Relationship Between Metabolism, Developmental Schedules, and Longevity Using Phylogenetic Independent Contrasts |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=149–60 |date=1 February 2007 |pmid=17339640 |pmc=2288695 |url=http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17339640 |doi=10.1093/gerona/62.2.149 }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><br />
== Disproving the Rate-of-Living theory ==
An article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />
In another article, Anne Bronikowski and David Vleck also explain how the Rate-of-living theory didn't quite follow their research either. By using the garter snake as the subject, they studied two different groups. One group had a shorter life span and fast growth which resulted in early reproduction, and the other group consisted of snakes with a longer lifespan, later reproductive rate, and later maturation.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Bronikowski|first=Anne|last2=Vleck|first2=David|date=2010-11-01|title=Metabolism, Body Size and Life Span: A Case Study in Evolutionarily Divergent Populations of the Garter Snake (Thamnophis elegans)|url=https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/50/5/880/646116|journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology|language=en|volume=50|issue=5|pages=880–887|doi=10.1093/icb/icq132|issn=1540-7063|doi-access=free}}</ref> They wanted to determine if metabolism in fully grown and mature animals were different from the two different groups they were examining.<ref name=":2" /> It was discovered that the Rate-of-living theory initially, did agree with their metabolic results which demonstrated that the faster group would reach a larger mass, and had a higher metabolic rate compared to the longer lived group.<ref name=":2" /> The correlation between metabolism and lifespan the Rate-of-living theory created did prove true in this part of the experiment. However, Bronikowski and Vleck discovered the relationship between the Rate-of-living theory and their experiment isn't that straightforward. Between both groups, their isn't a large difference of their metabolic rates at birth.<ref name=":2" /> Resulting in the Rate-of-living theory inconsistent. It was also found that their wasn't a difference in either groups resting metabolic rate.<ref name=":2" /> Bronikowski and Vleck came to the conclusion that the reason for their results was because of increased oxygen consumption from the shorter lived group could have caused oxidative stress in the snakes resulting in a shorter lifespan.<ref name=":2" />
==See also==
• [[DNA damage theory of aging]]
== References ==
{{reflist}}
*Rubner, M. (1908). Das Problem der Lebensdauer und seiner beziehungen zum Wachstum und Ernährung. Munich: Oldenberg.
*Raymond Pearl. The Rate of Living. 1928
*{{cite journal | author = Speakman J. R. | year = 2005 | title = Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan | url = | journal = The Journal of Experimental Biology | volume = 208 | issue = Pt 9| pages = 1717–1730 | doi = 10.1242/jeb.01556 | pmid = 15855403 | doi-access = free }}
*{{cite journal | author = Harman D | year = 1956 | title = Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry | url = | journal = Journal of Gerontology | volume = 11 | issue = 3| pages = 298–300 | doi = 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.663.3809 | pmid = 13332224 }}
*{{cite journal |vauthors=Speakman JR, Selman C, McLaren JS, Harper EJ | date = June 2002 | title = Living fast, dying when? The link between aging and energetics | url = | journal = Journal of Nutrition | volume = 132 | issue = 6| pages = 1583S–97S | doi = 10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S | pmid = 12042467 | doi-access = free }}
*{{cite journal |author1=Holloszy J. O. |author2=Smith E. K. | year = 1986 | title = Longevity of cold-exposed rats: A reevaluation of the "rate-of-living theory | url = | journal = Journal of Applied Physiology | volume = 61 | issue = Suppl 2 | pages = 1656–1660 |doi=10.1152/jappl.1986.61.5.1656 |pmid=3781978 }}
[[Category:Theories of biological ageing]]
[[Category:Metabolism]]
{{portal bar|Metabolism}}' |
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff ) | '@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@
== Disproving the Rate-of-Living theory ==
-A recent article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />
+An article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />
In another article, Anne Bronikowski and David Vleck also explain how the Rate-of-living theory didn't quite follow their research either. By using the garter snake as the subject, they studied two different groups. One group had a shorter life span and fast growth which resulted in early reproduction, and the other group consisted of snakes with a longer lifespan, later reproductive rate, and later maturation.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Bronikowski|first=Anne|last2=Vleck|first2=David|date=2010-11-01|title=Metabolism, Body Size and Life Span: A Case Study in Evolutionarily Divergent Populations of the Garter Snake (Thamnophis elegans)|url=https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/50/5/880/646116|journal=Integrative and Comparative Biology|language=en|volume=50|issue=5|pages=880–887|doi=10.1093/icb/icq132|issn=1540-7063|doi-access=free}}</ref> They wanted to determine if metabolism in fully grown and mature animals were different from the two different groups they were examining.<ref name=":2" /> It was discovered that the Rate-of-living theory initially, did agree with their metabolic results which demonstrated that the faster group would reach a larger mass, and had a higher metabolic rate compared to the longer lived group.<ref name=":2" /> The correlation between metabolism and lifespan the Rate-of-living theory created did prove true in this part of the experiment. However, Bronikowski and Vleck discovered the relationship between the Rate-of-living theory and their experiment isn't that straightforward. Between both groups, their isn't a large difference of their metabolic rates at birth.<ref name=":2" /> Resulting in the Rate-of-living theory inconsistent. It was also found that their wasn't a difference in either groups resting metabolic rate.<ref name=":2" /> Bronikowski and Vleck came to the conclusion that the reason for their results was because of increased oxygen consumption from the shorter lived group could have caused oxidative stress in the snakes resulting in a shorter lifespan.<ref name=":2" />
' |
New page size (new_size ) | 11070 |
Old page size (old_size ) | 11076 |
Size change in edit (edit_delta ) | -6 |
Lines added in edit (added_lines ) | [
0 => 'An article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />'
] |
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines ) | [
0 => 'A recent article published in January 2020 demonstrates that there is no evidence for the Rate-of-Living theory across the tetrapod tree of life. Written by Gavin Stark, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, and Shai Meiri, the article, explains why the Rate-of-Living theory no longer holds true. By using a data set that showed the lifespan of thousands of vertebrates and using the different ideas that the Rate-of-Living theory supports, they were able to come up with an experiment that was able to test how these ideas, such as metabolic rates relate to the lifespan of different vertebrates.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Stark|first=Gavin|last2=Pincheira‐Donoso|first2=Daniel|last3=Meiri|first3=Shai|date=2020|title=No evidence for the ‘rate-of-living’ theory across the tetrapod tree of life|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069|journal=Global Ecology and Biogeography|language=en|volume=29|issue=5|pages=857–884|doi=10.1111/geb.13069|issn=1466-8238}}</ref> The experiment results showed that the correlation between metabolic rate and the lifespans of animals especially for vertebrates doesn't hold true as originally thought. Other relationships that help to increase longevity such as colder climates for reptiles and amphibians were found.<ref name=":1" /> <ref>{{Cite web|title=(PDF) Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate of the desert chameleon Chamaeleo calyptratus|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus|website=ResearchGate|language=en|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> However, this relationship did not hold true for mammal species. The experiment also pointed out that reptiles and amphibians that are the same size as mammals and birds have relatively close lifespans to each other even though these species have significantly different metabolic rates.<ref name=":1" /> Overall the experiment proves that the rate of living theory doesn't support the lifespan of land vertebrates but instead proposes that lifespan is instead influenced by selection from external elements.<ref name=":1" />'
] |
All external links added in the edit (added_links ) | [
0 => '//doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01556',
1 => '//doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S'
] |
All external links removed in the edit (removed_links ) | [] |
All external links in the new text (all_links ) | [
0 => '//doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01556',
1 => '//doi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.01556',
2 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15855403',
3 => '//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.663.3809',
4 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgeronj%2F11.3.298',
5 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13332224',
6 => 'http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/6/1583S',
7 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fjn%2F132.6.1583S',
8 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12042467',
9 => 'https://archive.org/details/whyweagewhatscie00aust',
10 => 'http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17339640',
11 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgerona%2F62.2.149',
12 => '//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2288695',
13 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17339640',
14 => 'https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069',
15 => '//doi.org/10.1111%2Fgeb.13069',
16 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1466-8238',
17 => 'https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus',
18 => 'https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/50/5/880/646116',
19 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Ficb%2Ficq132',
20 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1540-7063',
21 => 'http://physrev.physiology.org/content/87/4/1175.full',
22 => 'http://www.discoverymedicine.com/S-J-Olshansky/2009/07/25/what-determines-longevity-metabolic-rate-or-stability',
23 => 'http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/19/20/2399.full',
24 => 'http://www.immortalhumans.com/the-longevity-secret-for-tortoises-is-held-in-their-low-metabolism-rate/',
25 => '//doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.6.1583S',
26 => '//doi.org/10.1152%2Fjappl.1986.61.5.1656',
27 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3781978'
] |
Links in the page, before the edit (old_links ) | [
0 => '//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.663.3809',
1 => '//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.663.3809',
2 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgerona%2F62.2.149',
3 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgerona%2F62.2.149',
4 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgeronj%2F11.3.298',
5 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fgeronj%2F11.3.298',
6 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Ficb%2Ficq132',
7 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Ficb%2Ficq132',
8 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fjn%2F132.6.1583S',
9 => '//doi.org/10.1093%2Fjn%2F132.6.1583S',
10 => '//doi.org/10.1111%2Fgeb.13069',
11 => '//doi.org/10.1111%2Fgeb.13069',
12 => '//doi.org/10.1152%2Fjappl.1986.61.5.1656',
13 => '//doi.org/10.1152%2Fjappl.1986.61.5.1656',
14 => '//doi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.01556',
15 => '//doi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.01556',
16 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12042467',
17 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12042467',
18 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13332224',
19 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13332224',
20 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15855403',
21 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15855403',
22 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17339640',
23 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17339640',
24 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3781978',
25 => '//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3781978',
26 => '//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2288695',
27 => '//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2288695',
28 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1466-8238',
29 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1466-8238',
30 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1540-7063',
31 => '//www.worldcat.org/issn/1540-7063',
32 => 'http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17339640',
33 => 'http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/19/20/2399.full',
34 => 'http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/6/1583S',
35 => 'http://physrev.physiology.org/content/87/4/1175.full',
36 => 'http://www.discoverymedicine.com/S-J-Olshansky/2009/07/25/what-determines-longevity-metabolic-rate-or-stability',
37 => 'http://www.immortalhumans.com/the-longevity-secret-for-tortoises-is-held-in-their-low-metabolism-rate/',
38 => 'https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/50/5/880/646116',
39 => 'https://archive.org/details/whyweagewhatscie00aust',
40 => 'https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13069',
41 => 'https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235790054_Effects_of_body_mass_and_temperature_on_standard_metabolic_rate_of_the_desert_chameleon_Chamaeleo_calyptratus'
] |
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node ) | false |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp ) | 1595830837 |