Details for log entry 21,149,550

16:51, 14 May 2018: Jerome Kohl (talk | contribs) triggered filter 550, performing the action "edit" on Octet (Stravinsky). Actions taken: Tag; Filter description: nowiki tags inserted into an article (examine | diff)

Changes made in edit

According to Stravinsky, he composed the Octet fairly rapidly in 1922. After completing the first [[Movement (music)|movement]], he composed the [[Waltz (music)|waltz]] that would become the fourth variation of the middle movement. Only after composing this waltz did the idea come to him that it might be a good [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a variation movement. The seventh variation, a [[fugato]], especially pleased Stravinsky, and the following third movement grew out of this final variation (Stravinsky and Craft 1963, 71). One biographer concludes that Stravinsky began composing the Octet after returning from Germany to [[Biarritz]] late in the autumn of 1922, and completed the score on 20 May 1923 {{harv|White|1979|loc=308–309}}.
According to Stravinsky, he composed the Octet fairly rapidly in 1922. After completing the first [[Movement (music)|movement]], he composed the [[Waltz (music)|waltz]] that would become the fourth variation of the middle movement. Only after composing this waltz did the idea come to him that it might be a good [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a variation movement. The seventh variation, a [[fugato]], especially pleased Stravinsky, and the following third movement grew out of this final variation (Stravinsky and Craft 1963, 71). One biographer concludes that Stravinsky began composing the Octet after returning from Germany to [[Biarritz]] late in the autumn of 1922, and completed the score on 20 May 1923 {{harv|White|1979|loc=308–309}}.


However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–462}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952.
However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–62}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952.


The published score does not carry a dedication, though Stravinsky said it was dedicated to [[Vera de Bosset]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=85, 308}}.
The published score does not carry a dedication, though Stravinsky said it was dedicated to [[Vera de Bosset]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=85, 308}}.
==Form==
==Form==
The Octet is in three movements:
The Octet is in three movements:
* [[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato)
{{ordered list|list-style-type=upper-roman
* Tema con variazioni (Andantino)
|[[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato)
* Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)
|Tema con variazioni (Andantino)
|Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)}}
The thematic and rhythmic materials of the three movements are interrelated {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=274}}, and the second movement connects to the third without a break.
The thematic and rhythmic materials of the three movements are interrelated {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=274}}, and the second movement connects to the third without a break.


===First movement===
===First movement===
The opening Sinfonia is a comparatively rare example (despite his label of "neoclassic composer") of Stravinsky's use of [[sonata form]] {{harv|Haimo and Johnson|1987|loc=x}}. His employment of this form, along with the other style elements consciously borrowed from the past, is not out of a reverent desire to perpetuate them, but rather constitutes a defiant and satirical act of mockery {{harv|Straus|1987|loc=161}}. The opening Lento section functions like a classical introduction, presenting the background tonal structure that will also govern the main Allegro section ({{harvnb|Haimo|1987|loc=45}}; {{harvnb|Straus|1987|loc=159}}).
The opening Sinfonia is a comparatively rare example (despite his label of "neoclassic composer") of Stravinsky's use of [[sonata form]] {{harv|Haimo and Johnson|1987|loc=x}}. His employment of this form, along with the other style elements consciously borrowed from the past, is not out of a reverent desire to perpetuate them, but rather constitutes a defiant and satirical act of mockery {{harv|Straus|1987|loc=161}}. The opening Lento section functions like a classical introduction, presenting the background tonal structure that will also govern the main Allegro section ({{harvnb|Haimo|1987|loc=45}}; {{harvnb|Straus|1987|loc=159}}).
:<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score>
<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score>


In the Allegro, Stravinsky exploits the apparent contradiction of two formal balances: one created through the parallel restatement of themes, the other through the symmetrical arrangement of themes and events on different structural layers of the composition {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=464}}.
In the Allegro, Stravinsky exploits the apparent contradiction of two formal balances: one created through the parallel restatement of themes, the other through the symmetrical arrangement of themes and events on different structural layers of the composition {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=464}}.


===Second movement===
===Second movement===
:<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score>
<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score>
In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–472}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|{{music|time|5|8}} time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}.
In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–72}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|5/8 time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}.


===Third movement===
===Third movement===
:<score vorbis="1"> \relative c'' { \clef bass \time 2/4 \tempo "Sempre" 4 = 116 g4. e8 | g c, e fis,~ | fis4. } </score>
:<score vorbis="1"> \relative c'' { \clef bass \time 2/4 \tempo "Sempre" 4 = 116 g4. e8 | g c, e fis,~ | fis4. } </score>
The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A′-C-A″-D-D′, where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–269, 272–273}}.
The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A'-C-A<nowiki>''</nowiki>-D-D', where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–69, 272–73}}.


==Reception==
==Reception==
==References==
==References==
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Anon.|1924}}|reference=Anon. 1924. "The Salzburg Festival: Stravinsky's Octet; The Work of English Composers". ''The Times'' (18 August): 8.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Anon.|1924}}|reference=Anon. 1924. "The Salzburg Festival: Stravinsky's Octet; The Work of English Composers". ''The Times'' (18 August): 8.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–191. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–91. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Copland|1968}}|reference=[[Aaron Copland|Copland, Aaron]]. 1968. ''The New Music 1900–1960'', revised and enlarged edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Copland|1968}}|reference=[[Aaron Copland|Copland, Aaron]]. 1968. ''The New Music 1900–1960'', revised and enlarged edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–463.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–63.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan. 1987. "Problems of Hierarchy in Stravinsky's Octet". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 36–54. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan. 1987. "Problems of Hierarchy in Stravinsky's Octet". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 36–54. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo and Johnson|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan, and Paul Johnson. 1987. "Editors' Preface". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, vii–xi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo and Johnson|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan, and Paul Johnson. 1987. "Editors' Preface". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, vii–xi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–480.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–80.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–339.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–39.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Simms|1986}}|reference=Simms, Bryan R. 1986. ''Music of the Twentieth Century: Style and Structure''. New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. {{ISBN|0-02-872580-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Simms|1986}}|reference=Simms, Bryan R. 1986. ''Music of the Twentieth Century: Style and Structure''. New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. {{ISBN|0-02-872580-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–161. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–61. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky and Craft|1963}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor, and Robert Craft. 1963. ''Dialogues and a Diary''. New York: Doubleday.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky and Craft|1963}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor, and Robert Craft. 1963. ''Dialogues and a Diary''. New York: Doubleday.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–274. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–74. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Walsh|2001}}|reference=Walsh, Stephen. 2001. "Stravinsky, Igor (Fyodorovich)". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians'', second edition, edited by [[Stanley Sadie]] and [[John Tyrrell (professor of music)|John Tyrrell]]. London: Macmillan Publishers.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Walsh|2001}}|reference=Walsh, Stephen. 2001. "Stravinsky, Igor (Fyodorovich)". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians'', second edition, edited by [[Stanley Sadie]] and [[John Tyrrell (professor of music)|John Tyrrell]]. London: Macmillan Publishers.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|White|1979}}|reference=White, Eric Walter. 1979. ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|White|1979}}|reference=White, Eric Walter. 1979. ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Aguilar|2006}}|reference=Aguilar, Victor Reyes. 2006. "Igor Stravinsky's "Octet for Wind Instruments" (1923): An Analysis and Discussion of Conducting Performance Practices". DMA diss. Los Angeles: UCLA.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Aguilar|2006}}|reference=Aguilar, Victor Reyes. 2006. "Igor Stravinsky's "Octet for Wind Instruments" (1923): An Analysis and Discussion of Conducting Performance Practices". DMA diss. Los Angeles: UCLA.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cross|2003}}|reference=Cross, Jonathan (ed.). 2003. ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky''. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cross|2003}}|reference=Cross, Jonathan (ed.). 2003. ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky''. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–235.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–35.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|2003}}|reference=Hyde, Martha M. 2003. "Stravinsky's Neoclassicism". In ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 98–136. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|2003}}|reference=Hyde, Martha M. 2003. "Stravinsky's Neoclassicism". In ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 98–136. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1981}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne Catherine. 1981. "Pitch-class Function, Centricity, and Symmetry as Transposition Relations in Two Works of Stravinsky". PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1981}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne Catherine. 1981. "Pitch-class Function, Centricity, and Symmetry as Transposition Relations in Two Works of Stravinsky". PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Lubaroff|2004}}|reference=Lubaroff, Scott. 2004. ''An Examination of the Neo-classical Wind Works of Igor Stravinsky: The Octet for Winds and Concerto for Piano and Winds''. Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music 102. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7734-6472-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Lubaroff|2004}}|reference=Lubaroff, Scott. 2004. ''An Examination of the Neo-classical Wind Works of Igor Stravinsky: The Octet for Winds and Concerto for Piano and Winds''. Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music 102. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7734-6472-8}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–577. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–77. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Van den Toorn|1983}}|reference=Van den Toorn, Pieter C. 1983. ''The Music of Igor Stravinsky''. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02693-5}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Van den Toorn|1983}}|reference=Van den Toorn, Pieter C. 1983. ''The Music of Igor Stravinsky''. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02693-5}}.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Wood|2007}}|reference=Wood, James R. 2007. "A Historical and Analytical Examination of the Stravinsky ''Octet for Wind Instruments'', with a Guide to Performance Preparation of the Two Trumpet Parts". DMA diss. Denton: University of North Texas.}}
* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Wood|2007}}|reference=Wood, James R. 2007. "A Historical and Analytical Examination of the Stravinsky ''Octet for Wind Instruments'', with a Guide to Performance Preparation of the Two Trumpet Parts". DMA diss. Denton: University of North Texas.}}

Action parameters

VariableValue
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
88822
Name of the user account (user_name)
'Jerome Kohl'
Age of the user account (user_age)
371760301
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => 'autoreviewer', 1 => 'extendedconfirmed', 2 => 'reviewer', 3 => 'rollbacker', 4 => '*', 5 => 'user', 6 => 'autoconfirmed' ]
Rights that the user has (user_rights)
[ 0 => 'autopatrol', 1 => 'extendedconfirmed', 2 => 'review', 3 => 'autoreview', 4 => 'autoconfirmed', 5 => 'editsemiprotected', 6 => 'rollback', 7 => 'createaccount', 8 => 'read', 9 => 'edit', 10 => 'createtalk', 11 => 'writeapi', 12 => 'viewmywatchlist', 13 => 'editmywatchlist', 14 => 'viewmyprivateinfo', 15 => 'editmyprivateinfo', 16 => 'editmyoptions', 17 => 'abusefilter-view', 18 => 'abusefilter-log', 19 => 'abusefilter-log-detail', 20 => 'centralauth-merge', 21 => 'vipsscaler-test', 22 => 'ep-bereviewer', 23 => 'collectionsaveasuserpage', 24 => 'reupload-own', 25 => 'move-rootuserpages', 26 => 'move-categorypages', 27 => 'createpage', 28 => 'minoredit', 29 => 'editmyusercss', 30 => 'editmyuserjson', 31 => 'editmyuserjs', 32 => 'purge', 33 => 'sendemail', 34 => 'applychangetags', 35 => 'spamblacklistlog', 36 => 'ep-enroll', 37 => 'mwoauthmanagemygrants', 38 => 'reupload', 39 => 'upload', 40 => 'move', 41 => 'collectionsaveascommunitypage', 42 => 'movestable', 43 => 'transcode-reset', 44 => 'skipcaptcha' ]
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
user_wpzero
false
Page ID (page_id)
30979646
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Octet (Stravinsky)'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Octet (Stravinsky)'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'restored continued page numbers to established "+2" format'
Old content model (old_content_model)
'wikitext'
New content model (new_content_model)
'wikitext'
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'[[File:Igor Stravinsky Essays.jpg|thumb|150px|Stravinsky in 1921]] The '''Octet''' for wind instruments is a [[Chamber music|chamber-music]] composition by [[Igor Stravinsky]], completed in 1923. Stravinsky’s Octet is scored for an unusual combination of [[Woodwind instrument|woodwind]] and [[brass instrument]]s: [[Western concert flute|flute]], [[clarinet]] in B{{Music|flat}} and A, two [[bassoon]]s, [[trumpet]] in C, trumpet in A, tenor [[trombone]], and bass trombone. Because of its dry [[Wind instrument|wind]] sonorities, [[divertimento]] character, and open and self-conscious adoption of "classical" [[Form (music)|forms]] of the [[Music of Germany|German tradition]] ([[sonata]], [[Variation form|variation]], [[fugue]]), as well as the fact that the composer published an article asserting his [[Formalism (music)|formalist]] ideas about it shortly after the Octet's first performance, it has been generally regarded as the beginning of [[Neoclassicism (music)|neoclassicism]] in Stravinsky's music, even though his [[opera]] ''[[Mavra]]'' (1921–22) already displayed most of the traits associated with [[Igor Stravinsky#Neoclassical period (c. 1920–1954)|this phase of his career]] {{harv|Walsh|2001|loc=§5}}. ==History== [[File:Scène de l'opéra Garnier.jpg|thumb|Stage of the [[Paris Opera]], where Stravinsky conducted the premiere of the Octet in 1923]] According to Stravinsky, he composed the Octet fairly rapidly in 1922. After completing the first [[Movement (music)|movement]], he composed the [[Waltz (music)|waltz]] that would become the fourth variation of the middle movement. Only after composing this waltz did the idea come to him that it might be a good [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a variation movement. The seventh variation, a [[fugato]], especially pleased Stravinsky, and the following third movement grew out of this final variation (Stravinsky and Craft 1963, 71). One biographer concludes that Stravinsky began composing the Octet after returning from Germany to [[Biarritz]] late in the autumn of 1922, and completed the score on 20 May 1923 {{harv|White|1979|loc=308–309}}. However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–462}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952. The published score does not carry a dedication, though Stravinsky said it was dedicated to [[Vera de Bosset]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=85, 308}}. Stravinsky himself conducted the premiere of the Octet on one of [[Serge Koussevitzky]]'s concerts at the Paris Opera House on 18 October 1923. This was the first time he had conducted a premiere of a new piece, though not the first time he had conducted his music in public {{harv|Walsh|2001|loc=§5}}. The cavernous space cannot have been ideal for presenting such a chamber-music work, but Stravinsky later expressed satisfaction with the balance of the sound at that performance {{harv|White|1979|loc=313}}. The very first recording that Stravinsky made was of the Octet: a private recording, probably made for his own study purposes, which is now lost {{harv|Cook|2003|loc=177}}. ==Form== The Octet is in three movements: {{ordered list|list-style-type=upper-roman |[[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato) |Tema con variazioni (Andantino) |Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)}} The thematic and rhythmic materials of the three movements are interrelated {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=274}}, and the second movement connects to the third without a break. ===First movement=== The opening Sinfonia is a comparatively rare example (despite his label of "neoclassic composer") of Stravinsky's use of [[sonata form]] {{harv|Haimo and Johnson|1987|loc=x}}. His employment of this form, along with the other style elements consciously borrowed from the past, is not out of a reverent desire to perpetuate them, but rather constitutes a defiant and satirical act of mockery {{harv|Straus|1987|loc=161}}. The opening Lento section functions like a classical introduction, presenting the background tonal structure that will also govern the main Allegro section ({{harvnb|Haimo|1987|loc=45}}; {{harvnb|Straus|1987|loc=159}}). :<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score> In the Allegro, Stravinsky exploits the apparent contradiction of two formal balances: one created through the parallel restatement of themes, the other through the symmetrical arrangement of themes and events on different structural layers of the composition {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=464}}. ===Second movement=== :<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score> In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–472}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|{{music|time|5|8}} time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}. ===Third movement=== :<score vorbis="1"> \relative c'' { \clef bass \time 2/4 \tempo "Sempre" 4 = 116 g4. e8 | g c, e fis,~ | fis4. } </score> The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A′-C-A″-D-D′, where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–269, 272–273}}. ==Reception== [[Aaron Copland]] witnessed the world premiere in Paris, and reported the general dismay at the abrupt, inexplicable turn away from Stravinsky's well-established neo-[[Primitivism|primitivist]] Russian style, to what appeared to everyone as "a mess of 18th-century mannerisms". The press, too, was unanimous in condemning what seemed like a bad joke. From a perspective of several decades later, of course, it had become clear that Stravinsky was embarking on a new and important stylistic phase that was destined to influence composers everywhere by bringing out a latent [[Objectivity (philosophy)|objectivist]] tendency in the music of the period, by openly reverting to the ideals, forms, and textures of the pre-[[Romanticism (music)|Romantic]] era {{harv|Copland|1968|loc=72}}. Not all of the early reviewers took a negative view, however. When the Octet was performed at the [[Salzburg Festival]] in 1924, by instrumentalists from Frankfurt conducted by [[Hermann Scherchen]], an anonymous reviewer in the ''[[The Times|Times]]'' declared that, "without claiming for it, after the manner of the composer's more violent admirers, that it is a seventh [[Brandenburg concertos|Brandenburg Concerto]]", it displayed "a complete mastery of the medium", as well as a sure sense of form and "an ingenuity in counterpoint" with its own laws. Though finding moments of unaccustomed discords preventing acceptance of the music as "beautiful", this critic concluded that "there is so much to admire in the work that it cannot be dismissed as a piece of buffoonery" {{harv|Anon.|1924}}. ==References== * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Anon.|1924}}|reference=Anon. 1924. "The Salzburg Festival: Stravinsky's Octet; The Work of English Composers". ''The Times'' (18 August): 8.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–191. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Copland|1968}}|reference=[[Aaron Copland|Copland, Aaron]]. 1968. ''The New Music 1900–1960'', revised and enlarged edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–463.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan. 1987. "Problems of Hierarchy in Stravinsky's Octet". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 36–54. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo and Johnson|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan, and Paul Johnson. 1987. "Editors' Preface". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, vii–xi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–480.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–339.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Simms|1986}}|reference=Simms, Bryan R. 1986. ''Music of the Twentieth Century: Style and Structure''. New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. {{ISBN|0-02-872580-8}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–161. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky and Craft|1963}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor, and Robert Craft. 1963. ''Dialogues and a Diary''. New York: Doubleday.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–274. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Walsh|2001}}|reference=Walsh, Stephen. 2001. "Stravinsky, Igor (Fyodorovich)". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians'', second edition, edited by [[Stanley Sadie]] and [[John Tyrrell (professor of music)|John Tyrrell]]. London: Macmillan Publishers.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|White|1979}}|reference=White, Eric Walter. 1979. ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}}.}} ==Further reading== * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Aguilar|2006}}|reference=Aguilar, Victor Reyes. 2006. "Igor Stravinsky's "Octet for Wind Instruments" (1923): An Analysis and Discussion of Conducting Performance Practices". DMA diss. Los Angeles: UCLA.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cross|2003}}|reference=Cross, Jonathan (ed.). 2003. ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky''. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–235.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|2003}}|reference=Hyde, Martha M. 2003. "Stravinsky's Neoclassicism". In ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 98–136. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1981}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne Catherine. 1981. "Pitch-class Function, Centricity, and Symmetry as Transposition Relations in Two Works of Stravinsky". PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Lubaroff|2004}}|reference=Lubaroff, Scott. 2004. ''An Examination of the Neo-classical Wind Works of Igor Stravinsky: The Octet for Winds and Concerto for Piano and Winds''. Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music 102. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7734-6472-8}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–577. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Van den Toorn|1983}}|reference=Van den Toorn, Pieter C. 1983. ''The Music of Igor Stravinsky''. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02693-5}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Wood|2007}}|reference=Wood, James R. 2007. "A Historical and Analytical Examination of the Stravinsky ''Octet for Wind Instruments'', with a Guide to Performance Preparation of the Two Trumpet Parts". DMA diss. Denton: University of North Texas.}} ==External links== *"[http://www.boosey.com/cr/music/Igor-Stravinsky-Octet-for-Wind-Instruments/826 Stravinsky, Igor: Octet for Wind Instruments (1922–23, rev.1952)]", programme note by [[Joseph Horowitz]] at the publisher's ([[Boosey & Hawkes]]) website. {{Igor Stravinsky}} {{Neoclassicism (music)|state=autocollapse}} [[Category:Compositions by Igor Stravinsky]] [[Category:1923 compositions]] [[Category:Compositions for octet]] [[Category:Compositions for flute]] [[Category:Compositions for clarinet]] [[Category:Compositions for bassoon]] [[Category:Compositions for trumpet]] [[Category:Compositions for trombone]] [[Category:Neoclassicism (music)]]'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'[[File:Igor Stravinsky Essays.jpg|thumb|150px|Stravinsky in 1921]] The '''Octet''' for wind instruments is a [[Chamber music|chamber-music]] composition by [[Igor Stravinsky]], completed in 1923. Stravinsky’s Octet is scored for an unusual combination of [[Woodwind instrument|woodwind]] and [[brass instrument]]s: [[Western concert flute|flute]], [[clarinet]] in B{{Music|flat}} and A, two [[bassoon]]s, [[trumpet]] in C, trumpet in A, tenor [[trombone]], and bass trombone. Because of its dry [[Wind instrument|wind]] sonorities, [[divertimento]] character, and open and self-conscious adoption of "classical" [[Form (music)|forms]] of the [[Music of Germany|German tradition]] ([[sonata]], [[Variation form|variation]], [[fugue]]), as well as the fact that the composer published an article asserting his [[Formalism (music)|formalist]] ideas about it shortly after the Octet's first performance, it has been generally regarded as the beginning of [[Neoclassicism (music)|neoclassicism]] in Stravinsky's music, even though his [[opera]] ''[[Mavra]]'' (1921–22) already displayed most of the traits associated with [[Igor Stravinsky#Neoclassical period (c. 1920–1954)|this phase of his career]] {{harv|Walsh|2001|loc=§5}}. ==History== [[File:Scène de l'opéra Garnier.jpg|thumb|Stage of the [[Paris Opera]], where Stravinsky conducted the premiere of the Octet in 1923]] According to Stravinsky, he composed the Octet fairly rapidly in 1922. After completing the first [[Movement (music)|movement]], he composed the [[Waltz (music)|waltz]] that would become the fourth variation of the middle movement. Only after composing this waltz did the idea come to him that it might be a good [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a variation movement. The seventh variation, a [[fugato]], especially pleased Stravinsky, and the following third movement grew out of this final variation (Stravinsky and Craft 1963, 71). One biographer concludes that Stravinsky began composing the Octet after returning from Germany to [[Biarritz]] late in the autumn of 1922, and completed the score on 20 May 1923 {{harv|White|1979|loc=308–309}}. However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–62}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952. The published score does not carry a dedication, though Stravinsky said it was dedicated to [[Vera de Bosset]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=85, 308}}. Stravinsky himself conducted the premiere of the Octet on one of [[Serge Koussevitzky]]'s concerts at the Paris Opera House on 18 October 1923. This was the first time he had conducted a premiere of a new piece, though not the first time he had conducted his music in public {{harv|Walsh|2001|loc=§5}}. The cavernous space cannot have been ideal for presenting such a chamber-music work, but Stravinsky later expressed satisfaction with the balance of the sound at that performance {{harv|White|1979|loc=313}}. The very first recording that Stravinsky made was of the Octet: a private recording, probably made for his own study purposes, which is now lost {{harv|Cook|2003|loc=177}}. ==Form== The Octet is in three movements: * [[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato) * Tema con variazioni (Andantino) * Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto) The thematic and rhythmic materials of the three movements are interrelated {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=274}}, and the second movement connects to the third without a break. ===First movement=== The opening Sinfonia is a comparatively rare example (despite his label of "neoclassic composer") of Stravinsky's use of [[sonata form]] {{harv|Haimo and Johnson|1987|loc=x}}. His employment of this form, along with the other style elements consciously borrowed from the past, is not out of a reverent desire to perpetuate them, but rather constitutes a defiant and satirical act of mockery {{harv|Straus|1987|loc=161}}. The opening Lento section functions like a classical introduction, presenting the background tonal structure that will also govern the main Allegro section ({{harvnb|Haimo|1987|loc=45}}; {{harvnb|Straus|1987|loc=159}}). <score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score> In the Allegro, Stravinsky exploits the apparent contradiction of two formal balances: one created through the parallel restatement of themes, the other through the symmetrical arrangement of themes and events on different structural layers of the composition {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=464}}. ===Second movement=== <score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score> In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–72}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|5/8 time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}. ===Third movement=== :<score vorbis="1"> \relative c'' { \clef bass \time 2/4 \tempo "Sempre" 4 = 116 g4. e8 | g c, e fis,~ | fis4. } </score> The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A'-C-A<nowiki>''</nowiki>-D-D', where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–69, 272–73}}. ==Reception== [[Aaron Copland]] witnessed the world premiere in Paris, and reported the general dismay at the abrupt, inexplicable turn away from Stravinsky's well-established neo-[[Primitivism|primitivist]] Russian style, to what appeared to everyone as "a mess of 18th-century mannerisms". The press, too, was unanimous in condemning what seemed like a bad joke. From a perspective of several decades later, of course, it had become clear that Stravinsky was embarking on a new and important stylistic phase that was destined to influence composers everywhere by bringing out a latent [[Objectivity (philosophy)|objectivist]] tendency in the music of the period, by openly reverting to the ideals, forms, and textures of the pre-[[Romanticism (music)|Romantic]] era {{harv|Copland|1968|loc=72}}. Not all of the early reviewers took a negative view, however. When the Octet was performed at the [[Salzburg Festival]] in 1924, by instrumentalists from Frankfurt conducted by [[Hermann Scherchen]], an anonymous reviewer in the ''[[The Times|Times]]'' declared that, "without claiming for it, after the manner of the composer's more violent admirers, that it is a seventh [[Brandenburg concertos|Brandenburg Concerto]]", it displayed "a complete mastery of the medium", as well as a sure sense of form and "an ingenuity in counterpoint" with its own laws. Though finding moments of unaccustomed discords preventing acceptance of the music as "beautiful", this critic concluded that "there is so much to admire in the work that it cannot be dismissed as a piece of buffoonery" {{harv|Anon.|1924}}. ==References== * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Anon.|1924}}|reference=Anon. 1924. "The Salzburg Festival: Stravinsky's Octet; The Work of English Composers". ''The Times'' (18 August): 8.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–91. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Copland|1968}}|reference=[[Aaron Copland|Copland, Aaron]]. 1968. ''The New Music 1900–1960'', revised and enlarged edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–63.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan. 1987. "Problems of Hierarchy in Stravinsky's Octet". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 36–54. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo and Johnson|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan, and Paul Johnson. 1987. "Editors' Preface". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, vii–xi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–80.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–39.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Simms|1986}}|reference=Simms, Bryan R. 1986. ''Music of the Twentieth Century: Style and Structure''. New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. {{ISBN|0-02-872580-8}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–61. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky and Craft|1963}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor, and Robert Craft. 1963. ''Dialogues and a Diary''. New York: Doubleday.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–74. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Walsh|2001}}|reference=Walsh, Stephen. 2001. "Stravinsky, Igor (Fyodorovich)". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians'', second edition, edited by [[Stanley Sadie]] and [[John Tyrrell (professor of music)|John Tyrrell]]. London: Macmillan Publishers.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|White|1979}}|reference=White, Eric Walter. 1979. ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}}.}} ==Further reading== * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Aguilar|2006}}|reference=Aguilar, Victor Reyes. 2006. "Igor Stravinsky's "Octet for Wind Instruments" (1923): An Analysis and Discussion of Conducting Performance Practices". DMA diss. Los Angeles: UCLA.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cross|2003}}|reference=Cross, Jonathan (ed.). 2003. ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky''. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–35.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|2003}}|reference=Hyde, Martha M. 2003. "Stravinsky's Neoclassicism". In ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 98–136. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1981}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne Catherine. 1981. "Pitch-class Function, Centricity, and Symmetry as Transposition Relations in Two Works of Stravinsky". PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Lubaroff|2004}}|reference=Lubaroff, Scott. 2004. ''An Examination of the Neo-classical Wind Works of Igor Stravinsky: The Octet for Winds and Concerto for Piano and Winds''. Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music 102. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7734-6472-8}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–77. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Van den Toorn|1983}}|reference=Van den Toorn, Pieter C. 1983. ''The Music of Igor Stravinsky''. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02693-5}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Wood|2007}}|reference=Wood, James R. 2007. "A Historical and Analytical Examination of the Stravinsky ''Octet for Wind Instruments'', with a Guide to Performance Preparation of the Two Trumpet Parts". DMA diss. Denton: University of North Texas.}} ==External links== *"[http://www.boosey.com/cr/music/Igor-Stravinsky-Octet-for-Wind-Instruments/826 Stravinsky, Igor: Octet for Wind Instruments (1922–23, rev.1952)]", programme note by [[Joseph Horowitz]] at the publisher's ([[Boosey & Hawkes]]) website. {{Igor Stravinsky}} {{Neoclassicism (music)|state=autocollapse}} [[Category:Compositions by Igor Stravinsky]] [[Category:1923 compositions]] [[Category:Compositions for octet]] [[Category:Compositions for flute]] [[Category:Compositions for clarinet]] [[Category:Compositions for bassoon]] [[Category:Compositions for trumpet]] [[Category:Compositions for trombone]] [[Category:Neoclassicism (music)]]'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ According to Stravinsky, he composed the Octet fairly rapidly in 1922. After completing the first [[Movement (music)|movement]], he composed the [[Waltz (music)|waltz]] that would become the fourth variation of the middle movement. Only after composing this waltz did the idea come to him that it might be a good [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a variation movement. The seventh variation, a [[fugato]], especially pleased Stravinsky, and the following third movement grew out of this final variation (Stravinsky and Craft 1963, 71). One biographer concludes that Stravinsky began composing the Octet after returning from Germany to [[Biarritz]] late in the autumn of 1922, and completed the score on 20 May 1923 {{harv|White|1979|loc=308–309}}. -However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–462}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952. +However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–62}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952. The published score does not carry a dedication, though Stravinsky said it was dedicated to [[Vera de Bosset]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=85, 308}}. @@ -18,23 +18,22 @@ ==Form== The Octet is in three movements: -{{ordered list|list-style-type=upper-roman -|[[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato) -|Tema con variazioni (Andantino) -|Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)}} +* [[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato) +* Tema con variazioni (Andantino) +* Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto) The thematic and rhythmic materials of the three movements are interrelated {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=274}}, and the second movement connects to the third without a break. ===First movement=== The opening Sinfonia is a comparatively rare example (despite his label of "neoclassic composer") of Stravinsky's use of [[sonata form]] {{harv|Haimo and Johnson|1987|loc=x}}. His employment of this form, along with the other style elements consciously borrowed from the past, is not out of a reverent desire to perpetuate them, but rather constitutes a defiant and satirical act of mockery {{harv|Straus|1987|loc=161}}. The opening Lento section functions like a classical introduction, presenting the background tonal structure that will also govern the main Allegro section ({{harvnb|Haimo|1987|loc=45}}; {{harvnb|Straus|1987|loc=159}}). -:<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score> +<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score> In the Allegro, Stravinsky exploits the apparent contradiction of two formal balances: one created through the parallel restatement of themes, the other through the symmetrical arrangement of themes and events on different structural layers of the composition {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=464}}. ===Second movement=== -:<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score> -In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–472}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|{{music|time|5|8}} time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}. +<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score> +In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–72}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|5/8 time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}. ===Third movement=== :<score vorbis="1"> \relative c'' { \clef bass \time 2/4 \tempo "Sempre" 4 = 116 g4. e8 | g c, e fis,~ | fis4. } </score> -The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A′-C-A″-D-D′, where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–269, 272–273}}. +The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A'-C-A<nowiki>''</nowiki>-D-D', where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–69, 272–73}}. ==Reception== @@ -45,15 +44,15 @@ ==References== * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Anon.|1924}}|reference=Anon. 1924. "The Salzburg Festival: Stravinsky's Octet; The Work of English Composers". ''The Times'' (18 August): 8.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–191. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–91. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Copland|1968}}|reference=[[Aaron Copland|Copland, Aaron]]. 1968. ''The New Music 1900–1960'', revised and enlarged edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–463.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–63.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan. 1987. "Problems of Hierarchy in Stravinsky's Octet". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 36–54. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Haimo and Johnson|1987}}|reference=Haimo, Ethan, and Paul Johnson. 1987. "Editors' Preface". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, vii–xi. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–480.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–339.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–80.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–39.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Simms|1986}}|reference=Simms, Bryan R. 1986. ''Music of the Twentieth Century: Style and Structure''. New York: Schirmer Books; London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. {{ISBN|0-02-872580-8}}.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–161. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–61. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky and Craft|1963}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor, and Robert Craft. 1963. ''Dialogues and a Diary''. New York: Doubleday.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–274. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–74. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Walsh|2001}}|reference=Walsh, Stephen. 2001. "Stravinsky, Igor (Fyodorovich)". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians'', second edition, edited by [[Stanley Sadie]] and [[John Tyrrell (professor of music)|John Tyrrell]]. London: Macmillan Publishers.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|White|1979}}|reference=White, Eric Walter. 1979. ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}}.}} @@ -62,9 +61,9 @@ * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Aguilar|2006}}|reference=Aguilar, Victor Reyes. 2006. "Igor Stravinsky's "Octet for Wind Instruments" (1923): An Analysis and Discussion of Conducting Performance Practices". DMA diss. Los Angeles: UCLA.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cross|2003}}|reference=Cross, Jonathan (ed.). 2003. ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky''. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–235.}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–35.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|2003}}|reference=Hyde, Martha M. 2003. "Stravinsky's Neoclassicism". In ''The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 98–136. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1981}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne Catherine. 1981. "Pitch-class Function, Centricity, and Symmetry as Transposition Relations in Two Works of Stravinsky". PhD diss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Lubaroff|2004}}|reference=Lubaroff, Scott. 2004. ''An Examination of the Neo-classical Wind Works of Igor Stravinsky: The Octet for Winds and Concerto for Piano and Winds''. Studies in the History and Interpretation of Music 102. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press. {{ISBN|978-0-7734-6472-8}}.}} -* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–577. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}} +* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–77. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Van den Toorn|1983}}|reference=Van den Toorn, Pieter C. 1983. ''The Music of Igor Stravinsky''. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. {{ISBN|0-300-02693-5}}.}} * {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Wood|2007}}|reference=Wood, James R. 2007. "A Historical and Analytical Examination of the Stravinsky ''Octet for Wind Instruments'', with a Guide to Performance Preparation of the Two Trumpet Parts". DMA diss. Denton: University of North Texas.}} '
New page size (new_size)
17717
Old page size (old_size)
17776
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
-59
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–62}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952.', 1 => '* [[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato)', 2 => '* Tema con variazioni (Andantino)', 3 => '* Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)', 4 => '<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score>', 5 => '<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score>', 6 => 'In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–72}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|5/8 time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}.', 7 => 'The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A'-C-A<nowiki>''</nowiki>-D-D', where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–69, 272–73}}.', 8 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–91. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}', 9 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–63.}}', 10 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–80.}}', 11 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–39.}}', 12 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–61. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}', 13 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–74. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}}', 14 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–35.}}', 15 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–77. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}}' ]
Lines removed in edit (removed_lines)
[ 0 => 'However, the sketch materials reveal a more complex chronology. Twelve measures of what would become the waltz variation were composed in 1919, and the fugato variation was the first complete section to be composed, in January 1921. There is an early five-page [[Draft document|draft]] of uncertain date for the beginning of the Allegro section in the first movement, at that time planned for [[piano]] and [[Concert band|wind orchestra]]. The main segments of the first movement were drafted in sketches dated between 12 July and 8 August, and the [[Sheet_music#Types|full score]] of the movement was completed on 16 August 1922. Two days later, Stravinsky began work on the second movement by adding the previously composed fugato, and then the waltz fragment, slightly expanded. The waltz coincidentally contains the same [[Interval (music)|intervals]] as the opening of the fugato, and on August 23, 1922, he created the [[Theme (music)|theme]] and titled the movement "Thème avec variations monométriques". Variation D was begun next, but work was interrupted and Stravinsky finished it only on 18 November, followed by the "ribbons of [[Scale (music)|scales]]" variation A on 1 December, variation B on 6 December, and variation C on 9 December. The Finale was completed in Paris on 20 May 1923 {{harv|Craft|1983–84|loc=458–462}}. The score was revised by the composer in 1952.', 1 => '{{ordered list|list-style-type=upper-roman', 2 => '|[[Sinfonia]] (Lento—Allegro moderato)', 3 => '|Tema con variazioni (Andantino)', 4 => '|Finale (Sempre {{Music|quarternote}} = 116, Tempo giusto)}}', 5 => ':<score vorbis="1"> { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 \tempo "Lento" 8 = 76 bes2-.\sfp~ bes16 <aes d,>-. <d f,>-. <ees aes,>-. | <aes d,>4-- << { g~ g16 } \\ { c,4\trill( b16) } >> } \new Staff \relative c'' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 3/4 r4 <aes f>\sfp\trill( <g ees>16) <bes bes,>-. <aes d,>-. <g f>-. | <g ees>4-- <f d>~ <f d>8 } >> } </score>', 6 => ':<score vorbis="1"> \relative c''' { \clef treble \time 3/4 \tempo "Andantino" 8 = 92 cis4( a cis | bes8 c!32 bes a bes c2) | \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4( bes cis c | \time 3/4 a2.) | cis4( c a | cis2) a4( | bes e g | fis,2.) } </score>', 7 => 'In 1922, when Stravinsky was composing the second, theme-and-variations movement, he confided in a letter to [[Ernest Ansermet]] that [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]] was for him what [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]] was to [[Pablo Picasso|Picasso]]. The hybrid of rondo and variation form resembles the slow movement of Mozart's [[Piano Concerto No. 22 (Mozart)|E{{Music|flat}} major Piano Concerto]], K. 482, to which it has been compared {{harv|Kielian-Gilbert|1991|loc=471–472}}. Variations 1, 3, and 6 are practically identical (all are labeled "variation A" in the score), and serve as introductions to the following variations 2, 4, and 7 {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=329}}. Stravinsky referred to this recurring introduction as the "ribbons of scales" variation {{harv|Stravinsky and Craft|1963|loc=71}}. The second, fourth, fifth, and seventh variations assume the characters of a [[March (music)|march]], a [[Waltz (music)|waltz]], a [[Can-can|cancan]], and a solemn fugue, respectively {{harv|Simms|1986|loc=279}}. The fugato is almost uniformly written in [[Quintuple meter|{{music|time|5|8}} time]] {{harv|White|1979|loc=311}}. This seventh, final variation is particularly surprising. The theme here is scarcely recognizable, and does not seem promising as the [[Subject (music)|subject]] for a fugue; the sound character of the variation, with its emphasis on slow-moving harmonic masses, is unearthly, and its plan is unconventional, with the subject occurring only four times {{harv|Nelson|1962|loc=337}}.', 8 => 'The finale's material is based on a rhythm identified by Stravinsky in earlier works (such as ''[[The Firebird]]'' and ''[[The Rite of Spring]]'') with the Russian circle-dance called a ''[[khorovod]]''. This repeating, three-note syncopated rhythm with proportions 3:3:2 (&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Dotted quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;&nbsp;[[File:Quarter note with upwards stem.svg|10px]]&nbsp;) is especially evident in the accompanying chords at the end, but all the preceding material in the movement is built on it or contains it. The overall formal design may be represented as A-B-A′-C-A″-D-D′, where the refrain material in the A sections occurs one time fewer in each successive repetition: three times, then two times, and finally just once. In this process, the ''khorovod''-like element becomes progressively less evident in the refrain, whereas in the intervening couplets it increases in clarity, from a disguised augmentation in the solo trumpet in section B, to a flute solo built on the original rhythmic shape in C, to the chordal accompaniment in D. The conception of a round dance is transformed here into an instrumental [[rondo]], with a main theme resembling a baroque fugue subject {{harv|Waeltner|1971|loc=267–269, 272–273}}.', 9 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Cook|2003}}|reference=[[Nicholas Cook|Cook, Nicholas]]. 2003. "Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky". In ''[[Cambridge Companions to Music|The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky]]'', edited by Jonathan Cross, 176–191. Cambridge Companions to Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-66377-9}}.}}', 10 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Craft|1983–84}}|reference=[[Robert Craft|Craft, Robert]]. 1983–84. "A. On the ''Symphonies of Wind Instruments''. B. Toward Corrected Editions of the Sonata, Serenade, and Concerto for Two Pianos. C. The Chronology of the Octet". ''Perspectives of New Music'' 22, nos. 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter/Spring-Summer): 448–463.}}', 11 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Kielian-Gilbert|1991}}|reference=Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1991. "Stravinsky's Contrasts: Contradiction and Discontinuity in His Neoclassic Music". ''The Journal of Musicology'' 9, no. 4 (Autumn): 448–480.}}', 12 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Nelson|1962}}|reference=Nelson, Robert U. 1962. "Stravinsky's Concept of Variations". ''The Musical Quarterly'' 48, no. 3, Special Issue for Igor Stravinsky on His 80th Anniversary (July), pp. 327–339.}}', 13 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Straus|1987}}|reference=Straus, Joseph N. 1987. "Sonata Form in Stravinsky". In ''Stravinsky Retrospectives'', edited by Ethan Haimo and Paul Johnson, 141–161. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.}}', 14 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Waeltner|1971}}|reference=Waeltner, Ernst Ludwig. 1971. "Aspekte zum Neoklassizismus Strawinskys: Schlußrhythmus, Thema und Grundriß im Finale des Bläser-Oktetts 1923". In ''Bericht über den Internationalen Musikwissenschaftlichen Kongress Bonn 1970'', edited by [[Carl Dahlhaus]], Hans Joachim Marx, Magda Marx-Weber, and Günther Massenkeil, with ''Bericht über das Symposium "Reflexionen über Musikwissenschaft heute"'', edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 265–274. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter-Verlag. {{ISBN|3-7618-0146-7}}.}}', 15 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hyde|1996}}|reference=Hyde, Martha Maclean. 1996. "Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music". ''Music Theory Spectrum'' 18, no. 2 (Fall): 200–235.}}', 16 => '* {{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Stravinsky|1924}}|reference=Stravinsky, Igor. 1924. "Some Ideas about My Octuor", translated from the French. ''The Arts'' 6, no. 1 (January): 4–6. Reprinted in Eric Walter White, ''Stravinsky: The Composer and His Works'', second edition, 574–577. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979. {{ISBN|0-520-03985-8}} (pbk).}}' ]
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1526316697