Anti-revisionism (Marxism-Leninism) is a position within Marxism–Leninism which emerged in the mid-1950s in opposition to the reforms of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. When Khrushchev pursued an interpretation that differed from his predecessor, Joseph Stalin, anti-revisionists within the international communist movement remained dedicated to Stalin's ideological legacy and criticized the Soviet Union under Khrushchev and his successors as state capitalist and social imperialist. During the Sino-Soviet split, the Communist Party of China, led by Mao Zedong; the Party of Labour of Albania, led by Enver Hoxha;[1] and some other communist parties and organizations around the world denounced the Khrushchev line as revisionist.
.jpg)
Mao Zedong first denounced the Soviet Union as revisionist at a meeting in January 1962.[2] In early 1963, Mao returned to Beijing after a prolonged visit to Wuhan and Hangzhou, and issued a call to combat domestic revisionism in China.[3] A 'central anti-revisionist drafting group' was formally constituted, led by Kang Sheng, which drafted anti-revisionist polemics, which were later personally reviewed by Mao before publication.[3] The 'Nine Articles' emerged as the centre-piece of anti-Soviet polemics.[4] Anti-revisionism would emerge as a key theme in Chinese foreign and domestic policies, reaching a peak during the 1966 Cultural Revolution.[2] China friendship associations turned into anti-revisionist organizations, and Western Europe anti-revisionist splinter groups began to emerge (such as the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party of France, the Grippa group in Belgium, and the Lenin Centre in Switzerland).[5] In Beijing, the street where the Soviet embassy was located was symbolically renamed as 'Anti-Revisionism Street'.[4] In the wake of the 1964 split in the Communist Party of India, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) would reject Soviet positions as revisionist, but the party did not fully adopt a pro-Chinese line.[6]
During Deng Xiaoping's reign in the late 1970s, anti-revisionist themes began to be downplayed in official Chinese discourse.[2] The Chinese Academy of Sciences stated that the 'Nine Articles' had been wrong in focusing on the revisionism of the Soviet Union, rather than the threats of Soviet hegemonism and expansionism.[4]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Elbaum, Max (April 10, 2018). Revolution in the Air: Sixties Radicals Turn to Lenin, Mao and Che. Verso Books. ISBN 9781786634597 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b c Robinson, Thomas W.; Shambaugh, David L. (1995). Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. Clarendon Press. pp. 249–254. ISBN 978-0-19-829016-2 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Lüthi, Lorenz M. (December 16, 2010). The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton University Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-1400837625 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b c Levine, Steven I. (1980). "The Unending Sino-Soviet Conflict". Current History. 79 (459): 70–104. doi:10.1525/curh.1980.79.459.70. JSTOR 45314865.
- ^ Schaufelbuehl, Janick Marina; Wyss, Marco; Zanier, Valeria, eds. (2018). Europe and China in the Cold War: Exchanges Beyond the Bloc Logic and the Sino-Soviet Split. New Perspectives on the Cold War. Vol. 6. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-38812-3 – via Google Books.
- ^ M. R. (1972). "CPI (M) between Moscow and Peking". Economic and Political Weekly. 7 (19): 918–919. JSTOR 4361331.
External links
edit- Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line by the Marxists Internet Archive
- Lies Concerning the History of the Soviet Union by the Stalin Society
- List of Anti-Revisionist Parties/Groups by the International Organizations and Conferences of Leftist Parties
- Stand for Socialism Against Modern Revisionism by the Philippine Revolution