Climax species

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lhughesg (talk | contribs) at 18:08, 15 December 2020 (I added two citations. One verified that disturbances allow pioneer species to re-establish, and the other verified that climax species are good competitors, but poor colonizers, while pioneer species are the good colonizers, but more competitors.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Climax species, also called late seral, late-successional, K-selected or equilibrium species, are plant species that can germinate and grow with limited resources, like low-sun exposure or low water availability.[1] They are the species within forest succession that are more adapted to stable and predictable environments, and will remain essentially unchanged in terms of species composition for as long as a site remains undisturbed.[2]

The seedlings of climax species can grow in the shade of the parent trees, ensuring their dominance indefinitely. A disturbance, such as fire, may kill the climax species, allowing pioneer or earlier successional species to re-establish for a time.[3] They are the opposite of pioneer species, also known as ruderal, fugitive, opportunistic or R-selected species, in the sense that climax species are good competitors but poor colonizers, whereas pioneer species are good colonizers but poor competitors.[4]

Climax species dominate the climax community, when the pace of succession slows down, the result of ecological homeostasis, which features maximum permitted biodiversity, given the prevailing ecological conditions. Their reproductive strategies and other adaptive characteristics can be considered more sophisticated than those of opportunistic species.

Through negative feedback, they adapt themselves to specific environmental conditions. Climax species are mostly found in forests. Climax species, closely controlled by carrying capacity, follow K strategies, wherein species produce fewer numbers of potential offspring, but invest more heavily in securing the reproductive success of each one to the micro-environmental conditions of its specific ecological niche. Climax species might be iteroparous, energy consumption efficient and nutrient cycling.[5]

Disputed term

The idea of a climax species has been criticized in recent ecological literature.[6] Any assessment of successional states depends on assumptions about the natural fire regime. But the idea of a dominant species is still widely used in silvicultural programs and California Department of Forestry literature.

Examples

White spruce (Picea glauca) is an example of a climax species in the northern forests of North America.

Other examples:

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Shimano, Koji (2000-02-01). "A power function for forest structure and regeneration pattern of pioneer and climax species in patch mosaic forests". Plant Ecology. 146 (2): 205–218. doi:10.1023/A:1009867302660. ISSN 1573-5052.
  2. ^ Wehenkel, Christian; Bergmann, Fritz; Gregorius, Hans-Rolf (2006-07-01). "Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?". Plant Ecology. 185 (1): 151–161. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2. ISSN 1573-5052.
  3. ^ Wehenkel, Christian; Bergmann, Fritz; Gregorius, Hans-Rolf (2006-07-01). "Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities?". Plant Ecology. 185 (1): 151–161. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9091-2. ISSN 1573-5052.
  4. ^ Brown, S.; Dockery, J.; Pernarowski, M. (2005-03-01). "Traveling wave solutions of a reaction diffusion model for competing pioneer and climax species". Mathematical Biosciences. 194 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2004.10.001. ISSN 0025-5564.
  5. ^ Relationships Among Species Archived June 16, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Results, Analysis of Timberland Owned by San Jose Water Company 2007-04-27

References

  • Selleck, G. W. "The climax concept". The Botanical Review. Volume 26, Number 4 / October, 1960. Springer.
  • Drury, William H.; Nisbet, Ian C.T. 1973. "Succession". Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 54: 331-368.
  • Horn, H S. "The Ecology of Secondary Succession". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. November 1974. Annual Reviews.
  • Swaine, M. D. and T. C. Whitmore. "On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests". Plant Ecology. Volume 75, Numbers 1-2 / May, 1988. Springer.
  • Buchanan, J. Robert. "Turing instability in pioneer/climax species interactions". October 2004. Science Direct.