Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

• G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

File:Goldfinger by Shirley Bassey UK vinyl.jpg

• File:Goldfinger by Shirley Bassey UK vinyl.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Re-looking at the label, the international logo of Columbia Records, consisting of the label name within the music note symbol, doesn't look copyrightable in the US. However, the logo is probably meant for international distribution. I found one from 1957, possibly the earliest. If the logo is not copyrightable in the US, then the previous versions should be undeleted. Should change from "fair use" to "PD-ineligible-USonly" as the information is too factual for copyright. -George Ho (talk) 07:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@George Ho: I see only one deleted version, which is a somewhat larger version of the image already there, and the current image seems already sufficiently large. What exactly do you want done here? Restore the larger version in the history? ~Anachronist (talk) 08:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Not yet. First, can you determine whether the label is copyrightable in the US? George Ho (talk) 08:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

@George Ho: I am not a lawyer, but I would think it's copyrightable. Although the logo consists of a circle, musical notes, and typefaces, the construction of those elements, with the words conforming to the shape of the eighth-note flag, is novel. It looks like a very similar construction as the Car Credit City logo described in the sidebar of the threshold of originality article, in which the CCC decoration by itself was deemed too simple to be protected, but a more complicated version, using an arrangement strikingly similar to that Columbia logo, was accepted for registration. One can probably argue either way, but in this case it would be best to play it safe and consider it copyrightable. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

 Not done keep as fair use only. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Foreigner-I-Want-To-Know-Wh-297484.jpg

• File:Foreigner-I-Want-To-Know-Wh-297484.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I nominated File:Foreigner - I Want to Know What Love Is.jpg for deletion at Commons because it is apparently non-free. The local copy must be undeleted and then reused in I Want to Know What Love Is. -George Ho (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Coats of arms of U.S. Cavalry Regiments

• Coats of arms of U.S. cavalry regiments · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article deleted because it should be a gallery on Commons (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Coats_of_arms_of_U.S._Cavalry_Regiments). Request userification so that can be accomplished. -Hammon27 (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

• Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Hammon27/Coats of arms of U.S. Cavalry Regiments. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

User:AnnieL/sandbox

• User:AnnieL/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

You should not be deleting a user page/sandbox. It was something I was still working on--a work in progress. I did NOT request it to be published. Please retrieve immediately so I can continue to work on it! -AnnieL (talk) 23:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

It was advertising and exactly what it was when I tagged it, it was so blatant, there were no conceivable improvements to suggest it was anything else but advertising. Pleas see WP:What Wikipedia is not, as these materials are never restored regardless of "improvements". Also, you'll note that in this NOT policy, any pages of advertising can and will be removed, regardless if they were your own userpages. SwisterTwister talk 01:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Sanjay Mehta Cricketer

• Sanjay Mehta Cricketer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kumari Sabita (talk) 02:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• Not done Someone recreated it, but I deleted it again. See WP:NATHLETE Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Loena Hendrickx

I proposed this article for deletion a year ago and it was deleted uncontroversially ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Loena_Hendrickx ). Since that time, I believe she has met the criteria for inclusion, winning two senior international medals (silver at the International Cup of Nice and NRW Trophy) and senior gold at the Belgian Championships. Hergilei (talk) 04:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done see Draft:Loena Hendrickx awaiting your improvements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Lukas Plawecki

• Lukas Plawecki · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This fighter gain WKN World Title on 3rd of December, so now his profile matches to Wikipedia sportmen policy. I will edit those info and add all his latest fights to the profile before posting -Łukasz Czarnowski (talk) 09:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

The deleted version already said he won the WAKO World Cup, so either you can ask user talk:Malcolmxl5 about it, whether WKN is more significant than WAKO, or I could restore to a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Łukasz Czarnowski: are you happy to have this restored as a draft? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gene of uncertain significance

• Draft:Gene of uncertain significance · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Dpaulbick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dpaulbick (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Dpaulbick: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wells Cathedral Oratorio Society

• Draft:Wells Cathedral Oratorio Society · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The cathedral library which holds important supporting information was closed due to an attack of mould and I could not get extra information needed. I now hope to edit the article to be acceptable -Somerset Ben (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Somerset Ben: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2601:602:9202:3280:B087:B4B3:E636:3F8B (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

You have to tell us the name of the page you want undeleted. JohnCD (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Sophistication by Harry Watrous, 1908.jpg Comment

• File:Sophistication by Harry Watrous, 1908.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was given a notice stating that a few days would be allowed before this would be deleted and that was less than four days ago. I was away at the weekend and now I come to attend to this, it's gone. Please restore so that I may follow up. -Andrew D. (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Andrew Davidson: it isn't gone, it's just been moved to to Commons. The link still works the same, but the file location is no longer on the English Wikipedia, so that it would be usable by other Wikis. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Anachronist: I'd like the original back on Wikipedia please. I usually put {{keep local}} on such uploads for this reason. Andrew D. (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Andrew Davidson: I confess I don't understand the problem in keeping a public domain file on Commons. Would you explain?

I have no objection to Commons having a copy too. But I prefer to work with files on Wikipedia per {{keep local}}. Please restore the deleted file. Andrew D. (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@Fastily: It seems this file was moved to Commons prematurely, before the uploader tagged it. Would you consider moving it back please? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Andrew Davidson:  Done, file restored and tagged with {{keep local}}. At first I wasn't sure if the same name in two places would cause problems, but it appears that it will be OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rice University Department of Bioengineering

• Draft:Rice University Department of Bioengineering · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Dsazer25, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dsazer25 (talk) 21:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I will note that university departments are quite rarely notable by themselves, regardless of major university name, so this would not be independently notable, especially if there's simply the basic information. SwisterTwister talk 22:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:UTS ePRESS

• Draft:UTS ePRESS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, KarmaTZangpo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KarmaTZangpo (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

• Draft:UTS ePRESS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I wish to have the article undeleted so I can continue to edit it. The notification of intention to delete was received today but when I went in to work on the text to ensure compliance with Wikipedia rules (especially external references to UTS ePRESS), I found the page already deleted! -KarmaTZangpo (talk) 23:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

LongHill

• LonHill · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hadn't edited it for years due to job and other pressures, I'm going to work on it in the next few days "Save page" button below -Lucalove2 (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• LongHill · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hadn't edited it for years due to job and other pressures, I'm going to work on it in the next few days. I don't see why it should be deleted. A lot of work goes into these and periods of dormancy should be expected "Save page" button below -Lucalove2 (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see User:Lucalove2/sandbox Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer

• Draft:Warp speed Data Transfer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Laurent Demailly, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Laurent Demailly (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Anna Stewart

• Draft:Anna Stewart · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Miranda.Salt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Updated information available as well as rewrite -Miranda.Salt (talk) 08:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

@Miranda.Salt: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Juan Pablo Hernández

• Juan Pablo Hernández · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Userfy to User:Ahnoneemoos/sandbox. I'm not sure if this article is about a politician that was running for the 26th Senate of Puerto Rico. I need to check the content first before requesting a full undeletion. The basis for this is that a politician under this name is currently in a legal review that might have an impact regarding the Constitution of Puerto Rico (see [1]). -—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ahnoneemoos:  Done to User:Ahnoneemoos/Juan Pablo Hernández. It is the same guy: he was a candidate in the elections on Nov 8, don't know whether he was elected. The page was deleted by PROD after sitting untranslated for two weeks at WP:PNT. JohnCD (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

CapoRumba

• Draft:CapoRumba · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The reason i hadn't edited the article is because nothing had changed. My partner and I had a baby and the caporumba activities were put on hold. Now they start again with a monthly party starting in January 29th 2017. it's my belief that after this date we will get reviews and possibly TV interest and the article can then be edited and re apply for inclusion. The reason it wasn't included was the supporting media, reports or reviews. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below}}

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Prevention Research Institute

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International Prevention Research Institute · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, MaRuKuSu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MaRuKuSu (talk) 09:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

MotoCMS

Please undelete MotoCMS page MotoCMS because it was just a proposed deletion, and the content that was published on this page was not promotional. It was useful for readers.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.9.50.71 (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user SwisterTwister (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Simply Gluten Free Magazine

• Draft:Simply Gluten Free Magazine · ( talk | logs | links | watch | mfd ) · [revisions]

I, M.Renae, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. M.Renae (talk) 14:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

New Mobility Agenda

• New Mobility Agenda · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

New information and references available -ericbritton 18:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC) ericbritton 18:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick W. Hitchon

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick W. Hitchon · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FedderSL, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FedderSL (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Marcos Kurtycz

• Draft:Marcos Kurtycz · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mimulus88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mimulus88 (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 19:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:UrbanToronto.ca

• Draft:UrbanToronto.ca · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 69.196.140.109, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.196.140.109 (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre

• Draft:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Copenhagen Plant Science Centre (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

In short I originally removed this assuming it wasn't ever going to be accepted however an admin believed my message on the users TP as well as the removal could've been taken as me being an admin - This wasn't ever the intention and it certainly wasn't my intention to perhaps decieve or mislead if that makes sense, In hindsight I should've left a better edit summary as well as a better talkpage message, In short my edits were in Good Faith and I was simply trying to help, Ofcourse infuture I shan't remove anything from this page again and infuture talkpage messages I shall be clearer, I apologise for the unintentional disruption caused, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

In this case a COI editor was doing the right thing in using WP:AFC. The draft was not written in a promotional style and so could be retrieved. But first wait for the user to get a new username. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I went ahead and restored this anyway because the blocked user is attempting to get unblocked to change the username, and when that happens there's no reason to keep the article deleted. If the user remains blocked, the draft will simply expire again anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Arrow waveguide

• Arrow waveguide · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I need to retrieve the suggestions and comments made by my classmates for the page. They were in the talk page. -Rpc91 (talk) 00:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Ben Newman

• Ben Newman · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I disagree with the prod reason, "Ben Newman has requested complete removal of his page from Wikipedia for personal reasons", and so would like this article to be restored. Do not restore revisions deleted in 2006, but only those deleted on New Year's Eve 2015. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 06:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, the text is unambiguously promotional and the cited sources don't do much to establish notability. Those would be valid reasons to keep it deleted. What I'll do is restore it and propose it for deletion at AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.

And now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Newman. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage

• Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 23.31.127.201, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.31.127.201 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Page was deleted because the draft hadn't been worked on in six months. I would like to try again to get the draft approved and published. -23.31.127.201 (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Old Bridge Township Raceway Park

• Old Bridge Township Raceway Park · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I challenge this PROD -Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC) --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Xiaolian Peng

• Draft:Xiaolian Peng · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Draft contains useful information that can be used in the article Peng Xiaolian -Zanhe (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done Please use the content and then redirect the draft to the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:National Security Analysis Center

• Draft:National Security Analysis Center · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Subs99 (talk) 20:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

National Security Analysis Center

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Milan (cultural festival)

• Milan (cultural festival) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page exists as an information guide regarding the Cultural Fest conducted by SRM University, India, every year. Please restore the page or send us a copy of the page that existed to make the necessary changes to the references and to update the content on the page. -Vault.dsa (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Abhijeet Gholap.jpg

• File:Abhijeet Gholap.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Permission confirmed by OTRS ticket 2016092610001805 --- Rrburke (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Rrburke:  Done, file restored. Please check my tagging and make any corrections needed. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Tim Atkins (poet)

• Tim Atkins · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi -- my first time with this process, hope I'm doing it right. I hadn't logged in for a while, and my article about this poet was proposed and then deleted before I noticed. I am fairly sure I can gather enough sources for the basic WP:BIO criteria, especially if I dive behind a few paywalls, and probably for the additional criteria as well. There doesn't seem to have been any discussion, but I'm happy to try Wikipedia:Deletion review if you think that's more appropriate. Thanks! Franciscrot (talk) 14:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Franciscrot: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa

• Draft:Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ppemau, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ppemau (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Coiled Coil Domain Containing 142

• Draft:Coiled Coil Domain Containing 142 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Chitt017, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chitt017 (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

DJTJ

• DJTJ · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'm not trying to get this page recreated. I just am trying to find out the date when it was most recently re-created. Just checking to ensure that a topic ban wasn't violated. (Figured this would be the best place to ask since administrators whom assist with this page specialize in such requests to locate deleted diffs.) -Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Steel1943: it was created as an article 28 Feb 2009 and deleted A7 the same day, then created as a redirect 21 July 2016 and deleted 22 Nov 2016 as a result of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 14#DJTJ. JohnCD (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Thank you for that information. Seems that no bans were violated, and I'll mark this  Not done for the bot. Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

List of Family Feud (2016 Philippine game show) episodes

• List of Family Feud (2016 Philippine game show) episodes · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I accidentally delete the contents of the page and put the speedy deletion template. I want to retrieve the article so I can move the data from other article. Please grant my request. I just need the data here. Thank you. -Leo kingston (talk) 11:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

@Leo kingston:  Done JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

David Beurle

• David Beurle · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Page was marked as Proposed Deletion but I hadn't had an opportunity to review or improve the page -Mrassel (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Yago Roche

• Yago Roche · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hello, a few weeks ago I made the page of an artist called Yago Roche Spanish who has sounded on MTVLA, has been nominated for several prizes in Spain and with many news on the network and the user Yintan ordered to "eliminate quickly" without being able to argue Nothing and I consider that the page should be activated again, please consider restoring it. Page was marked as Proposed Deletion but I hadn't had an opportunity to review or improve the page - --ShayminCat (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

If I remember correctly I tagged it for an A7 speedy deletion. I've also tried to explain the reasons for this in a discussion with ShayminCat on my Talk page. Yintan  21:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

In this case you should ask user talk:Bbb23 as it was both nominated and deleted under speedy delete criterion A7. If there is prize information then perhaps this could be added to a draft. But a nomination for a prize does not mean that much unless independent writers covered it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Afterburner (Transformers)

• Afterburner (Transformers) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Requesting this be userfied to User:Davidgoodheart/Afterburner (Transformers) per request on my talk page for assistance with undeletion. The editor would like to see the prior draft prior to working on a new version. --- Dane ^talk 21:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• I'll ping Joyous!. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Ingrid Stabb

• Ingrid Stabb · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to have this article userfied to User:FiendYT/Ingrid Stabb, as I believe I can further improve it and make it eligible to be on the main space via sources etc. -FiendYT ★ 01:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

List of Langit Lupa episodes

• List of Langit Lupa episodes · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I need request Langit Lupa is added episode information last week it was adding Afd nomination happened. because they aired making a episode title using twitter. I believe to put back the list of episodes. Oripaypaykim (talk) 03:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• I'll ping Jo-Jo Eumerus, as he was the deleting admin at that AfD. Something to be cautious of is that it might not yet really merit a spinoff page, as the article for the show is not that long and there aren't that many released episodes yet. I'm not making a judgement call here, just saying that I've seen it argued in many places that a show doesn't automatically merit a list page for episodes just because they aired, not if there's enough room on the article and there aren't a lot of episodes that have yet aired. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

  Um, @Oripaypaykim: can you rewrite your request to be a bit more grammatical? I have some difficulty reading it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

ajaysanchaniya

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2405:204:820F:CA1B:CC3C:FCDF:6EC5:3B39 (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• See the following response. In Wikipedia titles, spacing and captitalization are important. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Ajay sanchaniya

• Ajay sanchaniya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I have original and accurate information about this article -2405:204:820F:CA1B:CC3C:FCDF:6EC5:3B39 (talk) 12:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Not done If you are referring to Ajay Sanchaniya, then this is a not done as there was no claim of importance, and no independent references. You may start a draft, but if this is yourself, then please read WP:Autobiography and consider leaving the job to someone you do not know. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bronx Times

• The Bronx Times · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Milosheff (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC) The person who deleted my article is on some sort of a personal vendetta against me for unknown reasons. The article simply stated what The Bronx Times is and what it does as an independent online newspaper, covering the Borough of Bronx, NY. This person did not offer any constructive criticism, did not offer help, guidance or advice. If he thinks he is some kind of a cowboy, he does not belong here and should be removed. Deleting my article eliminates people's ability to inform themselves what The Bronx Times is. I am frankly in complete disbelief with this person's actions and ask that whoever monitors his actions here look into them more carefully. This totalitarian censorship approach is what we had during communism and fascism in Europe and should not be allowed here. Deplorable! I want my article restored and if needs changing then edited. PeterMilosheff (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Bronx Times: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Whpq (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.

You have the wrong idea about Wikipedia: it is not a place for people to tell the world about their own websites. As the websites owner, you should read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

Please also read WP:AGF. The deletion of your article has nothing to do with a vendetta and everything to do with Wikipedia's inclusion test, called Wikipedia:Notability, which asks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The references in the article at present are the website itself and a deadlink, which looks as though it was a list entry rather than "significant coverage". JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Fyuse

• Fyuse · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please restore this article to draft-space. I'll check if it's notable enough already later. -Fixuture (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Ajay sanchaniya

• Ajay sanchaniya icreate new page and after i solve this issue · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

No reasoning given. -Kishor gohel (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@Kishor gohel: Not done and will not be done. You may use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft, but unless Ajay Sanchaniya is notable in Wikipedia's sense, you will be wasting your time. Read WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (summary). This is not a social-networking site.

Warning: placing multiple requests here is disruptive, and if you persist you may be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)