Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

• G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions - see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Todd_Cochrane

• Todd_Cochrane · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This individual has been one of the key individuals responsible for growth in the podcasting space, and is notable in that way as well in being a online celebrity" button below -70.0.250.158 (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Veetrag/enparadigm

• User:Veetrag/enparadigm · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Veetrag, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Veetrag 03:53, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Round_Midnight_Creative_Arts&action=edit&redlink=1

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Clairenstu (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Round Midnight Creative Arts Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

COVERINGSETC

• COVERINGSETC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to put my article in Draft mode so I can continue editing it and adding in the signifigant refrerences and citations. -Minnianda (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Too much of the content was copied from other web sites. There is no benefit to Wikipedia in restoring copyrighted content. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SyndicateRoom

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SyndicateRoom · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Protonk (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC) <- inserted for an IP editor.

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Dyad System · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Alnstern, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alnstern (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• I restored this before, and you did nothing to improve the page. What do you propose to do? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Digital Fluid Power

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Fluid Power · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Digitalfluidpower (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. That said, what would you personally do in order to make sure the article got accepted? We do not undelete G13s more than once. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Bb-miler/sandbox

• User:Bb-miler/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bb-miler, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bb-miler (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done G13 delete was out of process. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Dr Lisa Marie Portugal

• User:Dr Lisa Marie Portugal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -72.208.10.96 (talk) 02:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done The userpage has been deleted (again) because userpages are not supposed to be used that way. If you wish to create an article about yourself, please follow the instructions here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Fresco (windowing system)

• Fresco (windowing system) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Fresco was deleted by User:GiantSnowman as an expired product. The page says "deleted page Fresco (windowing system) (Expired PROD, concern was: No notability, no references, no activity, no impact)". The Fresco window system is important historically, even if it's an "expired product". It was the first attempt at a general OpenGL-based window system, and in many ways an inspiration for Wayland. Please revert the deletion. -Resuna (talk) 02:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done Done. Proposed deletions can be reversed on request. If possible, please add sources for the bits about Fresco's novelty and connection to Wayland. Protonk (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
• Yep, I have a policy of pretty much restoring all PRODS upon request - @Resuna: you should have just approached me directly. GiantSnowman 06:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • If that's your preference that's fine, but PRODs are pretty easy for us to handle at REFUND so it's perfectly ok to bring them here. Protonk (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Vladimir Rizov

• Vladimir Rizov · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This person is deleted my page because its A7 for speedy deletion. Please, restore this page. -Vladimirrizov2 (talk) 06:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. the panda ₯’ 10:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh ABDUL ROUF DALAL

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh ABDUL ROUF DALAL · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 14.98.241.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 14.98.241.82 (talk) 08:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shubi Husain

• Shubi Husain · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Much more information including awards won and recognitions acknowledged by the public and media is available and needs to be added for a genuine consideration for inclusion -Ubsingh (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Actually there needs to be less puffery such as awards and recognition, but independent sources are welcome. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shubi Husain Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Eddy Francois

• Eddy Francois · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Is the subject of this article the same subject of Aidi (footballer, born 1990)? If so, can revisions be undeleted? I've created the same page as a redirect. -George Ho (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• There's very, very little there. Basically an infobox and one sentence sourced to this site. If you want I can restore it, but it's probably not worth the effort Protonk (talk) 18:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Ruan_Life_Sciences

• Ruan_Life_Sciences · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

please, let me know what documents you want me to submit, or how I can make notable the page. then click the "Save page" button below -Animesh1975 (talk) 18:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: It hasn't been deleted yet, but mere existence is not sufficient. You cannot make the "page" notable - the company has to be notable to begin with, and that one is not the panda ₯’ 18:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

EZ AD TV

• EZ AD TV · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted as a copyright violation, but I've received permission through OTRS (verify) to use the text under the standard dual license (CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL unversioned). Even so, the text of the website is probably too promotional anyway, so I'm not sure if adminstrators will entertain this request or userfy the content. -Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 19:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The style is promotional, but it could be edited, however there is no claim of importance either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Bollywood Khazana

• Bollywood khazana · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

As its a famous magzine of Bollywood INDIA so how can you delete it as its also ranks good in India and popular also and then click the "Save page" button below -Btownkhazana (talk) 16:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done There is no indication that this magazine meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. The article was promotional and cited no reliable sources. I have protected the article against creation since we had to delete it no less than four times in the last few days. Huon (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

did you get both Bollywood khazana and Bollywood Khazana?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Both are create protected... and Btownkhazana is indef blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Galina Vale

• Galina Vale · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Novaguitarra (talk) 19:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Page for musical artist Galina Vale was created 5 years ago, and all these time nobody tried to delete it. Why suddenly someone decided to delete it that is the question.

According to the logs, it was deleted because it was deemed to be 'Unambiguous advertising or promotion' Stuartyeates (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

The article was quite short and was only giving some facts of biography and achievements of the artist. It was here for 5 years, "no" major changes was made to it.

If someone could just improve it it would be much more helpful rather then just speedy delete it .

I request to review deletion please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novaguitarra (talk • contribs) 20:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Then the first thing you must do is contact the blocking administrator Jimfbleak. If Jimflbleak won't restore, it, then you can make your case at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

However, I'd say don't waste your time. The most recent deletion was due not just to promotion, but because the article contained copyright infringing material. Copyright infringements are deleted on sight, regardless of the duration on Wikipedia, and cannot be restored. Your best bet is to have the deleting administrator email you a copy, which you should not repost. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this issue. Yes, I have contacted jim, but has no answer. I think that the page was deleted because someone wanted to attack it, same time as the page was destroyed, also artist youtube channel was attacked. There was no copyright infringement on this page, page was standing here for 5 years, surely was checked by moderators many times over the years. No major changes was made, except it was only shortened. How to appeal against attack here in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novaguitarra (talk • contribs) 19:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Calling deletion an attack is pure rubbish. We have 30million+ pages and <700 active admins. We don't have time to patrol every article. Literally, nobody knows who Galina Vale is, so how could it be an "attack"? the panda ɛˢˡ” 10:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Pinoyexchange

• Pinoyexchange · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Redirect page is existing and valid and then click the "Save page" button below -Maracerella (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The redirect target PinoyExchange does not exist. It was deleted as the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PinoyExchange (2nd nomination). ~Amatulić (talk) 16:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Years & Years

• Years & Years · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jamellis (talk) 09:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Please undelete so that I can remove the copyright infringing sentences and resubmit for approval. I'd like to get this up as soon as possible and would appreciate any help! Thanks

 Not done, nothing to do. The page already exists as a redirect to Olly Alexander, which has never been deleted either. The redirect page Years & Years has never been deleted and has no deleted contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: This is about Draft:Years & Years, and every single sentence was copy-pasted. That's unsalvageable. Huon (talk) 17:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks for clarifying. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Windows 9

• Windows 9 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

The Windows 9 page was deleted because it was serving as a redirect that many thought confusing to many people. However, not only has there been a plethora of news articles and such concerning this topic, but Windows 9 is also set to be demoed tomorrow by Microsoft as a Technical preview. As such, this page could validly serve the Wikimedia community, not as a redirect, but as a full-fledged article detailing the deluge of information and news that will be coming over the next several weeks. Plus, it's bound to be confusing to type Windows 9 as an article search in to Wikipedia and not find it, considering that this has been kind of a hot topic on the Internet for several weeks now. -173.21.51.97 (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The redirect was deleted as a consequence of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 11#Windows 9. We don't restore pages by request if they were deleted as a result of discussions.

However, feel free to write an article about Windows 9. The entire deleted contribution history of that page was never more than a few hundred bytes long, when it was a disambiguation page 2 years ago.

It's high time Wikipedia had a full-fledged article on this subject. Go for it. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Great. Thanks for the info; I don't have time right now to create a new article from scratch, but maybe if I make a stub, people will see the topic is open again, and it can start anew. Also, since the article was recreated once and deleted again as it had been proposed for deletion, maybe there should be a note of some kind that says there is permission from an admin to start the article again? So it doesn't get nominated for speedy deletion? Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.21.51.97 (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

You can always flesh out a draft article (just create Draft:Windows 9, or if you don't have an account, use Wikipedia:Articles for creation) and it won't be deleted. It's the main space articles that get closer scrutiny. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

And take a look at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 30#Windows 9 for a current discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

David Bourgeois

• David Bourgeois · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'm a working film writer who's been published in hundreds of publications. No one single user gets to determine what is and isn't relevant for Wikipedia. Especially people who aren't in the same discipline. -Obdurate (talk) 15:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user WilyD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.

Also, no one single user made the decision to delete. Someone proposed it, and an administrator agreed. The fact is, that being published is not a factor for notability, as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Notability in Wikipedia's context is defined as having significant coverage by multiple, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for a general overview of what is expected. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Nouman Hashmi

• Nouman Hashmi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Remaindersend (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not done because the article isn't deleted. This isn't the place to contest proposed deletions, either. Please go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nouman Hashmi to participate in the discussion. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yahya Armajani

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yahya Armajani · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Penthrift, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Penthrift (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emma Handy

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emma Handy · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

RokafellaB (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• @RokafellaB: On a side note, you should refer to the article subject by her last name within the article as per editing/writing standards. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Highstein

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Highstein · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Racquelpalmese, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Racquelpalmese (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• @Racquelpalmese: I'm doing some minor editing to the page- the biggie I want to mention is that rather than listing the publishers as sources, you should be linking to stuff like the AllMusic reviews and newspaper articles. I'll see what I can do to help this along. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Air Pegasus

• Air Pegasus · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was deleted via CSD-A7 before i could respond to the tag. -Trinidade (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• I'm a little concerned that the article is for a company that has yet to actually start operating. However, if @FreeRangeFrog: is OK with it, I have no problem transferring it to your userspace. The problem here is that if this company never gets off the ground (drum riff) and never opens, then all we have are a handful of news stories about a company that never launched (sorry with the puns, can't help it) and that wouldn't really be enough to pass WP:CORP. It's just a little WP:TOOSOON for a mainspace entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79: I understand your concerns that the company might never take-off. ;) I've already written @FreeRangeFrog: asking to transfer it draftspace for now. Trinidade (talk) 10:26, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Trinidade: Done Userified to User:Trinidade/Air Pegasus. Keep in mind that as Tokyogirl says, the company must meet WP:CORP to exist in article space. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

europlus sialkot pvt ltd

• Europlus sialkot pvt ltd · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Qaseen (talk) 07:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC) sir i work in this company my boss said me to make the wikipedia page for our comapny so i create the page in wikipedia but why u are deleting this page sir please if ther is any problem with page please correct it but donot delete it

• The problem is that the page was fairly promotional in tone and the entire initial paragraph would have to be re-written in order to fit our neutrality guidelines. I'd say that a better way to phrase it would be "Euro Plus Sialkot (PVT) LTD is a manufacturer and exporter of military and sports equipment and clothing." That sums up everything in a nutshell and removes all of the promotional ad-speak, which again, isn't allowed on Wikipedia. You can elaborate somewhat from there, but avoid any WP:PEACOCK terms like "leading" and phrases like "would like to develop its presence on the world wide web to cater the business & business requirement of today's e-media world.Euro Plus, being a manufacturer and exporter wants to deliver quality products on global basis through skilled manpower, Best service & competitive prices." That's pretty much the biggest reason why the page was deleted as WP:G11. However that said, there are also some issues with coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS). Even if it is restored or re-created, you will need to show where the company has received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspapers and the like. I do note that your company is not located in the United States and because of that, coverage may not necessarily be in English. As long as the coverage is in a place that would pass muster at WP:RS/N, it can be used to help show notability regardless of what language it is written in. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Enviorment

• Enviorment · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This could be a piece of information about earth's enviorment and how much greenhouse gases we are causing. -Wikipedian 2 (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

• Not done This is actually a misspelling of the word environment. We already have a fairly substantial article on the topic at Environment (biophysical) and you're welcome to help contribute to that article. I do want to caution you about using Wikipedia as a WP:SOAPBOX for environmental causes, as we need to make sure that we're neutral about this sort of thing- regardless of how good and just we think that the cause is. I'm not overly worried about this, but I feel that I have to say it since you did say something about writing about the amount of greenhouse gases that are being created. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Windows 10

• Windows 10 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Windows 10 was just announced to be the next version of Microsoft Windows -Parkerreno (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes. So? It isn't being deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc.

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mjones1015, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mjones1015 (talk) 20:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

@Mjones1015: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Mercedes Barcella

• Mercedes Barcella · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I already fixed the problem they were having that it looked too commercial. Thanks for the heads up! --Gladys1555 (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC) -Gladys1555 (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

• Not done Gladys1555 The page hasn't been deleted yet and since this is a speedy deletion, the best place to argue against this would be on the article's talk page. There are some other issues with the page- it's also tagged with an WP:A7, meaning that there is a concern over Barcella's notability. You can address this by providing coverage in reliable sources such as links to news stories about her and so on. I notice that you have said that she has been on various shows, but we need to see proof of this to show what type of appearances these are and how in-depth they were. Was she only briefly shown in a 1 second flicker over her artwork? Was she shown in-depth? I also note that the article is still written in a fairly casual tone, as if it was a fan page or was taken from her personal website. I don't know that it's still overly promotional in the "buy her stuff now, she's awesome" way, but the overly casual tone can negatively impact a page and still come across as a little promotional. Not only that, but if this was taken from a press release or personal website, you need to be careful to avoid WP:COPYVIO. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Fragger

• Fragger · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Fragger is a notable iOS game. See the Metacritic page which links to numerous critic reviews here. -Coin945 (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done because we don't restore articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 by request on this page. @Coin945: If the game is notable (and I agree the Metacritic reviews constitute a decent argument for notability) then you have a good case to present to the deleting administrator RHaworth. The deleting admin should always be your first step. If he declines your request to restore, your next step is to take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

It was deleted for being an "Article about an eligible subject, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". I know nothing about this as I did not create that article back in 2013. So that indicates the topic is notable, but just had a shoddy article.--Coin945 (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

jay sharda construction

• Jay Sharda Construction · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It's an private organization and what's wrong in that i haven't written anything out of the bound.it's an company which gives employment to the person who are unemployed.

if any thing is wrong in this post then tell me i will surely change that thing and if am violating your rule then you can delete it from your end.

i will be giving all the registered details of the company and if doesn't follows your policy then it's up to you.

i am sure it will be beneficial for others. one day this page will have to be created because it's worth it. -Vivekk983 (talk) 12:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment: It hasn't been deleted, yet ... but see our requirements for notability for businesses for info as to why it will the panda ɛˢˡ” 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Years & Years

• Draft:Years & Years · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted for copyright infringement, when I in fact wrote the description on last.fm (it made sense to use the bio i'd written for Wikipedia). I think the problem therefore is that last.fm went live before the article was reviewed on Wikipedia. I am the author of the last.fm bio, meaning there is no copyright infringement. This being the case, is there any way that this can be undeleted? -Jamellis (talk) 13:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done @Jamellis: This was requested before, above, and the request was declined. There is no way copyrighted material can be restored unless the Wikimedia Foundation knows that the content is released under an acceptable free license. Yes, it was a copyright violation because it duplicated content from another website, and we can't rely on the word of some random user account claiming they own the copyright and therefore need no permission to reproduce the content here.

If you wrote it originally, you can write it again in different words.

Or, you can post a notice on the last.fm page that the content is public domain, or releasable under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Beeline VMS

• Beeline VMS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a current work in progress, we are adding information each day. Please do not delete the current page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.65.172 (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Too late. Who is "we"? Also, Wikipedia should not be used for publicity or promotion, ever. Talk to the deleting administrator if you want it restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Walters

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danny Walters · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, LukeOcana, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LukeOcana (talk) 23:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Ajecr (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Ajecr: Change your username first, as has been requested of you on your talk page, a request that you have ignored. Organizations cannot have Wikipedia accounts. An account must represent only one person as an individual. You can specify "yourname at AJECR" for a new username if you wish to retain the connection with your organization. Go to WP:CHU/Simple to request the change. Then we can entertain your request to restore an article draft that has been repeatedly rejected already. Show us you're serious. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Timothy Eldred

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timothy Eldred · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Timothyeldred (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done, because it was empty, with no content to restore except for invisible comments. Feel free to re-create it from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Kids Golf

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Kids Golf · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 69.199.15.66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 69.199.15.66 (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

NTH Ring

• NTH Ring · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted because of "Not of any relevance.". Strongly object to that reason. Here is a description from Civil engineer "A Scandinavian "civilingenjör" will in international contexts commonly call herself "Master of Science in Engineering" and will occasionally wear an engineering class ring. At the Norwegian Institute of Technology (now the Norwegian University of Science and Technology), the tradition with an NTH Ring goes back to 1914, before the Canadian iron ring." -Nsaa (talk) 19:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

@Nsaa: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Kind regards, Nsaa (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SearchSpring

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SearchSpring · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, SearchSpring, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SearchSpring (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Show us you're serious about being a valued contributor by complying with Wikipedia:Username policy for one thing, and change your username at WP:CHU/Simple. Then we can entertain requests to restore a draft article that has been previously tagged as spam and declined at WP:AFC. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

List of scouting troops and service units

• List of scouting troops and service units · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Referred to here from wp:AN. Would an administrator please userify to me a copy of recently deleted article List of scouting troops and service units, including its edit history? I contacted the closer of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scouting troops and service units for this, but they are involved in a lot elsewhere i think and i am not sure they are an administrator or not anyhow. Could someone else simply provide it? I may choose to develop it more or may choose to ask for deletion review. TIA, --doncram 21:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC) -doncram 21:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done. @Doncram: I restored the article and its talk page to User:Doncram/List of scouting troops and service units. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kcweiss713, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kcweiss713 (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pit Trading 101 (film) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kcweiss713, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kcweiss713 (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Please reinstate my page. I did not receive the emails requesting the edits.

Regards, Kathryn Weiss

My userpage User:DuncanHill

Could a kindly admin please undelete my userpage? Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

(Moved from ANI) NE Ent 00:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

==

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Eatthelions (talk) 03:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jenny Hope

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jenny Hope · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was never email that I needed to edit the page and then click the "Save page" button below -Eatthelions (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Logo of University Athletic Association of the Philippines.svg

• File:Logo of University Athletic Association of the Philippines.svg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is a logo of a significant organisation. I did not notice until today that the file was orphaned and completely deleted. An editor of the University Athletic Association of the Philippines article might have probably removed the significant logo without any valid reason. -—  McVahl  Talk  07:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Freefall (webcomic)

• Freefall (webcomic) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

One of the longest-running webcomics on the Internet, Freefall, has been deleted from Wikipedia twice over the years due to lack of notability. I'm placing this back into contention for undeletion one more time, using this as my justification:

"If you are not a fan of Freefall you ought to be. Alas, it really will involve some time because it is a serial story, and the current panels are shocking — that is, they have a total surprise that I do not think many readers saw coming...The story is well developed and very logically constructed. I’d like to see it win a Hugo. It’s really good." -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle, March 2, 2014, http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/forced-sale-of-crimea-learning-math-prince-igor-and-the-hearing-log-continues/

The original AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freefall (webcomic) -Modemac (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)