Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incabulos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Greyhawk through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge into List of Greyhawk deities. BOZ (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge and redirect into List of Greyhawk deities. The topic is verifiable in multiple authoritative sources and is a reasonable search term. --Mark viking (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

transwiki to some fansite that would love this trivia. as for Wikipedia, the subject fails WP:GNG all of the sources are by the creating company, the company that bought out the creating company or by the company officially licensed by the owners of the IP to create commercial content - subject has received no coverage by independent reliable sources, leaving the options of merge redirect or delete. Given there is only primary source material and the suggested merge target is already also bloated with only primary sourced material, a merge would seem to be merely shoveling the shit from one corner of the stall to another, which leaves redirect or delete. I am uncertain there is any evidence of a potential search term to necessitate a redirect rather than delete, but given the history of redirects being reinstated without any sources to address the failures of WP:GNG if redirect is the option, it needs to be locked down. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - impossible to verify notability through independent sources. Simone 17:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]