Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gumerperu
Gumerperu
- Gumerperu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gumerperu/Archive.
– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.
19 February 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Angelaquency (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
It seems a slightly bit more elaborated SPA, but the pattern is similar as in the previous (multiple) sockppuppets. Could it be possible to block the IP or an IP range? It's the 6th investigation and I think more than 10 accounts have been blocked already... Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 15:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- To me, this looks much like this, this, this or this: overlinking. But well, I might be wrong...--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 23:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Additional information needed - This case is woefully lacking in any sort of evidence, so I'm putting it on hold until we get something more concrete. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Administrator note It seems possible, but not obviously ducky. I see behavior similar to the previous sockpuppets, i.e., a penchant for overlinking, "signing" their own talk page after throwing seemingly arbitrary userboxes on their user page, and just happening to stumble upon a discussion about this article. A CU might be justifiable. --Kinu t/c 20:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- There needs to be considerable hard evidence before a clerk will endorse this case, and definitely before a CU gets run. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 22:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Administrator note It seems possible, but not obviously ducky. I see behavior similar to the previous sockpuppets, i.e., a penchant for overlinking, "signing" their own talk page after throwing seemingly arbitrary userboxes on their user page, and just happening to stumble upon a discussion about this article. A CU might be justifiable. --Kinu t/c 20:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)