67.160.36.12

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.160.36.12 (talk) at 19:37, 2 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 18 years ago by 67.160.36.12

Since Hoary seems understandably annoyed that our spat is tieing up the AfD, I have moved my questions here. So to repeat: , Wwo very specific yes or no questions. 1) Do you have links to where the above forum posts actually occured? 2) Did you or did you not construct the Joshuaz user name on Wikipedia? JoshuaZ 03:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


Seriously man you need to stop trying to be pretentious and pedantic...Do you actually think you are deser-ved of such immoderation. You are just some fundamentalist who took a rabid disliking to the film, attacked its fans and then threatened the deletion of the page on wikipedia. You know the link, YOU HAVE BEEN THERE. IF YOU DON'T THEN this only illustrates that you know nothing about this article. Now you are asking me if I am you? What is YOUR problem man!!! Do you get off on passively agressively attacking people on wikipedia??? Step off, you have already ruined the forum and now you are destroying this encyclopedia entry? Man I will never understand someone who hates information like this....67.160.36.12 08:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you are not aware, but someone made a user name Joshuaz with a lower case and attempted to impersonate me here, engaged in generic vandalism and involved himself on the AfD of the Funkastopheles article. So now I will kindly repeat, did you or did you not construct that user name? As for the forum weblinks, I'll just that that as a presumption that you can't provide them. When you are willing to answer the above question maybe then you might be worth talking to. JoshuaZ 18:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh and while were at it, for your comments to Hoary and just about everyone else on the deletion page:

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. JoshuaZ 18:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The pattern again, you attack then post wiki bannners LOL SHHHHHHHHHH! See JoshuaZ, there you go again. Your passive agressivity cannot find its way off of the tip of your ungenerous toungue. Making comments like "kindly repeat" and "worth talking to" simply illustrate that a pent up aggression still remains within you that on occassion spills over this protective wall the i-net has given you. You seem very paranoid to me. I believe that you prolly did the vandalism yourself, you prolly concocted this whole thing which would delve deeply into your apparent sociopothy. You can make all the presumptions you want, obviously they keep getting smashed in your face. Like the, lol, "evidence" you demanded, how does that taste? You pissed off the admins so much they had no problems sending screenshots ROFL. Trying to put the burden on others lets me know that you are socially isolated and this goes slightly further in explaining why you have such a deep and bitter contempt for works and products, LOL. I mean your digital martyrdom on your user page? ahahahahahaha That is the most telling and pathetic: 10000000000000 vandalisms? ahahahahahahahahaha C'mon girl, seriously. This is important because your pattern has become clear. 1) A fan makes a wikipedia page. 2) You discover it and "pursue" it. On google now less! lol 3) Probabaly following links on the page you stumble on the associated forum for this company. 4) You make a passive agressive nonsense comment about the film, but when your vilification gets subverted and users start to make fun of you, you pathetically add a canadian flag to your signature and a wikipedia link LOL. Which only lets people know there that there is actually a wikipedia page for the film. 5) You attempt to get youtube to delete the trailer, when they won't they only cede that it is adult content. LOL 6) Then you begin a PRIVATE MESSAGE campaign harrassing members, who only then make fun of you. Even the fimmakers chimes in and offeres you a dvd! Because he says "...this is a strange way to obtain a dvd, the requirements to recieve a free one are to submit a vulgar poem or story or critique...your posts do meet this vulgarity" YOU reply "I will take down your wikipedia page" LOL To which most reply "OH NO!!!!!" (this is sarcastic) Tho' I take interest because I believe it illuminates a firm divide in the art world in general. That authenticity is granted via commercial aknowledgement, the last place at least on the surface that you would think this would exist is the ever so socialist Wikipedia! However, it is clear that it is simply a clearinghouse for other stuff with an attached search engine-similiar, but much less honest to DIGG. 7) You lash out and do your wittle deletion thingy. Somebody notices and posts it on a thread. 8) Everytime you make a passive agressive comment someone quotes it and you are made fun of. So you lash out again and threaten to "take down" the forum. You anger and agenda have already become clear with your quotes, but that doesn't stop you LOL!!!! 9) You move to another thread and try and begin your tirade again. Mind you the forum, which was for cast, crew, fans and art show organizers was voted to go public only 1 week before. You appeared like a condomless meeting with a prostitute, pent up iRage and some sort of agenda against the film calling it "...crap" when you hadn't seen it etc. LOL 10) Your retaliation against fans of the film begins!!! ahahahahaha You link to hi resolution images from nasa to slow down and in your words "crash" the forum. They get deleted and after warnings you are banned! 11) You log on with "different" credentials and try the same stuff again. etc etc etc skip to now 12) You begin to vandalize things associatted with this page and then accuse every user who is opposed to you as being up to vandalism and the like LOL 13) Now you accuse me of being YOU! Joshua Zimmerman give it up man, placing pre-made wiki banners and deleting things you don't like won't make them go away in the real world. Developing some sort of social strength to deal with the world will be much more helpful to you than these passive agressive tirades that border on sociopathic behavior. Your desire to hurt and cause disruption is very much not only a sign/symptom but its very scary. But thankfully you have wikipedia LOL. I do think with a little education on your part, a realization that the rules of wikipedia have grey areas and an applied tuition to your obvious cognitive malady and passive agression you may find that you no longer need martyrdom! LOL The forum is where you know it is shall I ask for more screenshots of your IP? and your connections? Obviously you follwed the links on the films page to get there. A new mantra has emerged: Joshua Zimmerman digital martyr. Fundamentalist contrarian passive agressive. The real world too tough, from Wikipedia I strike back....LOL anyone can check the times that you PRODDED for deletion and the times you were on the forum to get a good idea. Also, when you got banned...You just continously log out and vandalize then login and comment on it ROFL.

ROFL indeed. The "passive agression" you're referring to is a template which was inserted on the page. So infact, why don't you tell the template that it's passive agression cannot find its way off the tip of its tongue? I'm sure it'd appreciate your comments. You know what they say about constructive criticism. --Darth Revert (AKA Deskana) (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

AHAHAHAHAHA Read the whole comment before trying to chime in. There is no needed discussion for templates. This is the JoshuaZ pattern incite then banner. Understand? Good ? Got it? Good! ROFL http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/7844/atopicarealist7bs.png http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/7497/banneduser032906ban4kt.png http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/1530/banneduser032906scomm3ra.png http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3267/banneduser03290610013ue.png http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/4495/banneduser03290610077hh.png http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/8844/banneduser03290610149fz.png http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6935/banneduser03290610180pj.png67.160.36.12 19:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply