Spworld2
Welcome!
| Welcome, Spworld2! | |
|---|---|
|
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanur Assembly constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajeev Chandrasekhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber police.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Nava Kerala Sadas has a new comment
Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
List of most-viewed Instagram reels moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to List of most-viewed Instagram reels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is unclear if any source establishes these as the absolute Top 5, one of the sources just discussed "some of the most-viewed" [1] rather than absolute Top 5. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MarioGom (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- noted , This list includes name and video of most viewed Instagram Reels with its reference along with its direct video link. This reduces the possibility of changing it to draft and wants to change it in the main space Like YouTube Video Lists and Instagram Post Likes and Followers List currently Article Available category includes this, which is going to move to main space Spworld2 10:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of most-viewed Instagram reels for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed Instagram reels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Politics of Kerala
After deletion of the "meme trolls in Kerala" thing, there appears to be at least two-editor support Freiland and me) for adding a section called something like "Social media" at Politics of Kerala that uses the better-quality ones of the sources you provided at AfD, to concisely and narrowly focus on use of social media (including but not overly dwelling on memes and trolling) by politicians and their supporters in Kerala. If you try to WP:COATRACK it into a "memes in Kerala are magically special" or "there's a unique trolling community in Kerala" story, you can expect it to be reverted. But if it sticks to just reporting the salient facts without elaboration and original research that paints and exaggeratory picture, then it would probably be useful. Some stuff to focus on: Kerala being somewhat behind-the-times until recently in this department, then over a fairly short span becoming very social-media active, especially in regards to citizen activism, and politicians themselves and their boosters using the Internet for campaigning, in lieu of street-corner rallies and paper leaflets. Plus two instances of governmental crack-down on socio-political trollers. That sort of stuff. Keep it on-topic and it will work well. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see article creation as a warning sound, I think Wikipedia can be a source for the world to know the truth about social media special in Kerala. I would like to include a part Kerala Social Media Politics in "Politics in Kerala" which has a clear source in this world, Hope more wikipedia professors like you to follow and post mortem on the slightest doubt, thank you for your great well wish. --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Lotus Lake Wetland Thirunavaya Malappuram. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
"Majlis Al-Noor" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Majlis Al-Noor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Majlis Al-Noor until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ayisha Abdul Basith
Hello Spworld2,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayisha Abdul Basith for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nomination of The Real Kerala Story for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Kerala Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.— Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 05:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Spworld2, thank you for your work on 2024 United Arab Emirates floods. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Controversy sections
Regarding your recent edits on the articles on E. P. Jayarajan and Arya Rajendran. Please note that your edits were reverted not for lacking reliable sources but because it violates several other policies. Please see and familiarise yourself with the following guidelines:
- WP:CRITS, which states that sections within articles dedicated to controversies must not be used unless there is a compelling reason to include them. Using terms like "controversies" as section headings should be avoided. Instead if the information is relevant it can be included in other sections.
- WP:CRYSTALBALL: Your content includes speculation, rumours or presumptions, which are not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia articles. For example, your edits on E. P. Jayarajan includes a speculation that the meeting was about Jayarajan joining the BJP. The sources only verify the occurence of a meeting not on what it was about.
- WP:UNDUE: The content should represent all significant viewpoints fairly. Your edits regarding Arya Rajendran's alleged abuse of a driver misrepresent the situation. The cited sources only mention an altercation between the mayor and a driver, with a police investigation currently underway. You must also note that the police case is against the driver for abusing the mayor. It seems you are trying to push your POV on the article. Also, using a strong term like "abuse" is misleading and not supported by the cited sources.
- WP:EVENT: Above all, Wikipedia is not a newspaper, it is an encyclopaedia. Random events should not be included unless they are of significant relevance to the subject matter.
Wikipedia is not a platform for personal agendas or political biases. Your edits must align with Wikipedia's policies, and WP:RELIABILITY is just one of them. I am removing the content added by you until you can clarify why they should be included. If you still want the content to be published, please discuss before you blindly revert, I will then take it cup for dispute resolution. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Thank you for your response and sorry for the delay in replying to the message. I cannot see anything in your reply that justifies your previous edits or any addressal of my concerns regarding the violation of Wikipedia policies such as WP:CRITS, WP:CRYSTALBALL or WP:NOTNEWS. Instead of addressing these issues, you have chosen to accuse me of WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO without providing any evidence or explanation. Let me clarify a few points: I made only a single previous edit on E. P. Jayarajan which was as part of my effort to revert all edits made by another user. There is no basis for accusing me of WP:COI when I have no previous history of edits on the article. Before making accusations, I suggest you familiarise yourself with what WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO actually mean. Accusing someone of serious misconduct such as WP:COI without evidence is against Wikipedia's guidelines. If you can provide satisfactory answers to my concerns about your edits, I am willing to discuss further. However, if you continue to insist on your WP:COI accusation, please escalate it at WP:COICOIN.Malayala Sahityam (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Najma Thabsheera moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Najma Thabsheera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
"Shihab Chottur (walker)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Shihab Chottur (walker) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 15 § Shihab Chottur (walker) until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris talk! 08:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Noted Spworld2 (talk) 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Tahsin Mohammed Jamshid. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Real Kerala Story (June 17)
|
Hello, Spworld2!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 00:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Keren Jadhav moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Keren Jadhav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Moreover, If you're connected with the subject, please disclose the COI 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 15:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Coordinates of 2024 Uttar Pradesh stampede
In these edits you removed the correct coordinates for the crowd crush, and replaced them with coordinates that pointed 10 kilometres away from the site of the tragedy. I am always curious as to the genesis of such errors, how did you come to insert these incorrect coordinates into the article? Abductive (reasoning) 08:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- The village coordinates where the incident took place is recorded on the basis of news reference, if there is any mistake in this, it can be corrected Spworld2 (talk) 08:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Going forward please refrain from placing incorrect information in Wikipedia articles. If you don't know how to do a particular type of edit, don't do that kind of edit, or ask for assistance. Abductive (reasoning) 09:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Dalit League. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on 100th Anniversary of Samastha Kerala. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for your work. IMO this should be condensed and merged into the Samastha artticle. It does not have the sourcing to meet wp:notability and the content of the article reflects that consisting of self-sourced material and duplication of material be should be in the Samastha article. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 Wayanad landslides
On 31 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Wayanad landslides, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 12:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Hamda Taryam Al Shamsi. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Your contributed article, 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Kolkata doctor rape and murder case. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2024 Kolkata rape and murder incident. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ZimZalaBim talk 16:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Chelari Airport for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelari Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Edit warring: August 2024
Hi Spworld2! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Neutralhappy (talk) 11:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Disruptive editing: August 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Neutralhappy (talk) 11:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)